AGE AS PROGNOSTIC FACTOR IN PREMENOPAUSAL BREAST-CARCINOMA

被引:360
|
作者
DELAROCHEFORDIERE, A
ASSELAIN, B
CAMPANA, F
SCHOLL, SM
FENTON, J
VILCOQ, JR
DURAND, JC
POUILLART, P
MAGDELENAT, H
FOURQUET, A
机构
[1] INST CURIE,DEPT BIOSTAT,F-75231 PARIS 05,FRANCE
[2] INST CURIE,DEPT MED ONCOL,F-75231 PARIS 05,FRANCE
[3] INST CURIE,DEPT SURG,F-75231 PARIS 05,FRANCE
[4] INST CURIE,DEPT PATHOL,F-75231 PARIS 05,FRANCE
来源
LANCET | 1993年 / 341卷 / 8852期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0140-6736(93)92407-K
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Whether or not young age at diagnosis is an adverse prognostic factor in breast cancer has long been controversial, in part because much previous work has not taken due account of menopausal status and confounding factors. We have analysed the influence of age on prognosis in a consecutive series of 1703 patients with stage I-III breast cancer. All were premenopausal and all were treated in one centre (Institut Curie, Paris) between 1981 and 1985. Mean age was 44 years (range 23-55) and median follow-up was 82 months. Younger patients had significantly lower survival rates and higher local and distant relapse rates than older patients. The hazard rate of relapse decreased over time in the youngest age group (less-than-or-equal-to 33) to reach that of older patients after 5 years. The relation between the hazard of recurrence and age was a continuous one, best fitted by a log-linear function and indicating a 4% decrease in recurrence for every year of age. Multivariate analysis of both survival and disease-free interval demonstrated that the worse prognosis of young age was independent of other factors such as clinical tumour size, clinical node status, histological grade, hormone receptor status, locoregional treatment procedure, and adjuvant systemic therapy. This difference in outlook has yet to be explained biologically but it does suggest the need for a closer look at the natural history of breast cancer in young women.
引用
收藏
页码:1039 / 1043
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] INCIDENCE AND ANALYSIS OF PROGNOSTIC CRITERIA IN BICLONAL BREAST-CARCINOMA
    SYMMANS, WF
    LIU, J
    SIMONE, P
    ESTABROOK, A
    KNOWLES, DM
    INGHIRAMI, G
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1992, 66 (01) : A18 - A18
  • [32] MALE BREAST-CARCINOMA - PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN 30 CASES
    RAJU, U
    GAFFEY, MJ
    ZARBO, RJ
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1995, 72 (01) : A23 - A23
  • [33] PREMENOPAUSAL OOPHORECTOMY VERSUS CMF CHEMOTHERAPY IN STAGE-II BREAST-CARCINOMA
    GELBER, RD
    GOLDHIRSCH, A
    CASTIGLIONE, M
    RUDENSTRAM, CM
    COLLINS, J
    SENN, HJ
    LANCET, 1993, 342 (8866): : 305 - 305
  • [34] GNRH-AGONISTS (ZOLADEX) THERAPY IN PREMENOPAUSAL WOMEN WITH METASTASIZING BREAST-CARCINOMA
    KAUFMANN, M
    SCHMID, H
    KIESEL, L
    KLINGA, K
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 1988, 48 (07) : 528 - 532
  • [35] TUMOR HORMONE RECEPTOR STATUS AND RECURRENCES IN PREMENOPAUSAL NODE NEGATIVE BREAST-CARCINOMA
    MOOT, SK
    PETERS, GN
    CHEEK, JH
    CANCER, 1987, 60 (03) : 382 - 385
  • [36] A MULTIPARAMETRIC STUDY ON THE PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF EPIDERMAL GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR IN OPERABLE BREAST-CARCINOMA
    GASPARINI, G
    BORACCHI, P
    BEVILACQUA, P
    MEZZETTI, M
    POZZA, F
    WEIDNER, N
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1994, 29 (01) : 59 - 71
  • [37] IMMUNOCYTOCHEMICAL DETECTION OF TUMOR-CELLS IN BONE-MARROW AS A PROGNOSTIC FACTOR IN BREAST-CARCINOMA
    MERKLE, E
    BAHR, J
    HENKE, A
    BUHNER, M
    MARTUS, P
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 1994, 54 (12) : 662 - 669
  • [38] BREAST-CARCINOMA IN WOMEN 35 YEARS OF AGE OR YOUNGER
    ROSEN, PP
    KINNE, DW
    LESSER, ML
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1984, 81 (06) : 804 - 805
  • [39] BREAST-CARCINOMA IN WOMEN 35 YEARS OF AGE OR YOUNGER
    ROSEN, PP
    LESSER, ML
    KINNE, DW
    BEATTIE, EJ
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1984, 199 (02) : 133 - 142
  • [40] RADIOGRAPHIC PATTERNS OF INTRATHORACIC DISEASE IN BREAST-CARCINOMA - PROGNOSTIC IMPLICATIONS
    GAWNECAIN, ML
    MALTHOUSE, SR
    REIDY, JF
    RUBENS, RD
    SMITH, P
    GREGORY, W
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1993, 48 (04) : 253 - 257