DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS - A COMPARISON OF CORTICOTOMY TECHNIQUES

被引:2
|
作者
FRIERSON, M
IBRAHIM, K
BOLES, M
BOTE, H
GANEY, T
机构
[1] LOYOLA UNIV, MED CTR, DEPT ORTHOPAED SURG, MAYWOOD, IL 60153 USA
[2] SHRINERS HOSP CRIPPLED CHILDREN, TAMPA, FL 33612 USA
[3] HINES VET HOSP, RES & DEV UNIT, HINES, IL USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The left hindlimbs of 15 adult mongrel dogs were lengthened using the Ilizarov external fixator. Five dogs were assigned to each of three separate groups: (I) corticotomy; (II) osteotomy with multiple drill holes and an osteotome; (III) osteotomy with an oscillating saw. Distraction began on postoperative day seven and continued at a rate of 0.25 mm every six hours for 26 days. The regenerate segments were evaluated with weekly radiographs and Dual Energy Photon X-ray (DEPX) beginning at day seven. Barium perfusion studies and histologic preparations were also performed after the dogs were killed. Periosteal callus formation was apparent in all groups at two weeks, and endosteal callus appeared in Groups I and II at three to four weeks. Perfusion studies at the end of the distraction period demonstrated vessels bridging across the regenerate gap in Groups I and II. Vessels bridging the gap were diminished in the oscillating-saw Group III specimens. During the distraction period, the appearance and length of the regenerate bone was similar for each group radiographically and by DEPX scanning. No histologic differences were seen in Groups I and II. Three of the four tibias cut with the oscillating: saw did not consolidate at ten weeks. A simple transverse osteotomy yields regenerate bone that is indistinguishable from the technically more difficult corticotomy. Use of the oscillating saw may lead to delayed consolidation.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 24
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis
    Sahoo, Nanda Kishore
    Issar, Yuvraj
    Thakral, Ankur
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 30 (08) : E743 - E746
  • [32] Alveolar distraction osteogenesis
    Chang, Hong-Po
    Chou, Tsau-Mau
    Tseng, Yu-Chuan
    Hsu, Han-Jen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2016, 11 (02) : 212 - 213
  • [33] Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis
    Hollier, LH
    Gosain, A
    Stelnecki, E
    Longaker, M
    McCarthy, JG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 1999, 10 (03) : 268 - 282
  • [34] Distraction osteogenesis in craniosynostosis
    Sandhaus, Henya
    Johnson, Matthew D.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2021, 29 (04): : 304 - 313
  • [35] Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis
    Winters, Ryan
    Tatum, Sherard A.
    [J]. FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 22 (04) : 653 - +
  • [36] Distraction osteogenesis in plagiocephaly
    Rodríguez, JC
    Dogliotti, P
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CRANIAL AND FACIAL BONE DISTRACTION PROCESSES: 2001 DISTRACTION ODYSSEY, 2001, : 501 - 505
  • [37] Distraction Osteogenesis in Dentistry
    Fernandes, Flavio Henrique Carrico N.
    Orsi, Iara Augusta
    Bezzon, Osvaldo Luiz
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY, 2010, 28 (03): : 743 - 748
  • [38] Distraction osteogenesis - the future?
    Reyneke, JP
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 39 (03): : 180 - 181
  • [39] Intraoral distraction osteogenesis
    Guerrero, CA
    Bell, WH
    Barros-St Pasteur, J
    Meza, LS
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CRANIAL AND FACIAL BONE DISTRACTION PROCESSES, 1997, : 183 - 199
  • [40] Distraction osteogenesis in the hand
    Pensler, JM
    Carroll, NC
    Cheng, LF
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 102 (01) : 92 - 95