MATURATION OF THE UTERINE CERVIX BY REPEATED INTRACERVICAL INSTILLATION OF PROSTAGLANDIN-E2

被引:10
|
作者
MILLIEZ, JM
JANNET, D
TOUBOUL, C
ELMEDJADJI, M
PANIEL, BJ
机构
[1] Department of Obstetrics and Gvnecology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Créteil
关键词
PROSTAGLANDIN; MATURATION; CERVIX; PREGNANCY;
D O I
10.1016/0002-9378(91)90278-Y
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
An attempt was made to ripen the uterine cervix in 100 high-risk pregnancy patients (pregnancy between 34 to 41 weeks' gestation), with the use of intracervical instillations of 0.25 mg of prostaglandin E2 mixed with a tylose gel. The maturation process was repeated every 48 hours. Forty-nine patients were delivered of infants after the first maturation and 51 patients required between two and nine instillations. In patients requiring multiple instillations, the mean delay between the first procedure and delivery was 9 +/- 4 days (range, 2.4 to 16 days). Among the 59 nulliparous women, only 23 were delivered of infants after a single maturation and 36 required multiple maturations (p < 0.02). When the group of patients who were delivered of infants after a single maturation process was compared with the group requiring multiple maturations, no difference could be seen with regard to age, term of pregnancy, or Bishop cervical score at the time of inclusion in the study. The myometrial activity and the onset labor induced by prostaglandin E2, were similar in both groups. Fetal heart rate decelerations occurred in 16.3% (8/49) of the patients with single maturations and in 17.6% (9/51) of the patients who required multiple maturations. The outcome of the pregnancy and the rate of cesarean sections (24% and 27%) were similar in both groups. No patients required cesarean sections because of failed induction of labor. Cervical ripening after repeated applications of 0.25 mg of prostaglandin E2 seems to be safe for the fetus, providing that the patient is closely supervised.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 528
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] UTERINE RESPONSE TO PROSTAGLANDIN-E2 UNDER ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVES
    TOPPOZADA, M
    KHOWESSAH, M
    SHAALA, S
    SAID, S
    OSMAN, M
    CONTRACEPTION, 1976, 13 (06) : 749 - 761
  • [42] UTERINE RUPTURE WITH THE USE OF VAGINAL PROSTAGLANDIN-E2 FOR INDUCTION OF LABOR
    CLAMAN, P
    CARPENTER, RJ
    REITER, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1984, 150 (07) : 889 - 890
  • [43] UTERINE SCAR RUPTURE IN LABOR INDUCED WITH VAGINAL PROSTAGLANDIN-E2
    BROMHAM, DR
    ANDERSON, RS
    LANCET, 1980, 2 (8192): : 485 - 486
  • [44] UTERINE RUPTURE ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF VAGINAL PROSTAGLANDIN-E2 SUPPOSITORIES
    KELLER, F
    JOYCE, TH
    CANADIAN ANAESTHETISTS SOCIETY JOURNAL, 1984, 31 (01) : 80 - 82
  • [45] INTERACTION OF AMINOGLYCOSIDE ANTIBIOTICS WITH OXYTOCIN AND PROSTAGLANDIN-E2 ON UTERINE CONTRACTILITY
    PARADELIS, AG
    TRIANTAPHYLLIDIS, C
    TARLATZIS, BC
    TSOURAS, JS
    ELMESSIDI, MM
    PAPALOUCAS, AC
    METHODS AND FINDINGS IN EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1982, 4 (05): : 343 - 345
  • [46] TREATMENT OF POSTPARTUM UTERINE ATONY WITH PROSTAGLANDIN-E2 VAGINAL SUPPOSITORIES
    HERTZ, RH
    SOKOL, RJ
    DIERKER, LJ
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1980, 56 (01): : 129 - 130
  • [47] THE UNRIPE CERVIX - MANAGEMENT WITH VAGINAL OR EXTRA-AMNIOTIC PROSTAGLANDIN-E2
    STEWART, P
    KENNEDY, JH
    HILLAN, E
    CALDER, AA
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1983, 4 (02) : 90 - 93
  • [48] COMPARISON OF ESTRADIOL AND PROSTAGLANDIN-E2 VAGINAL GEL FOR RIPENING THE UNFAVORABLE CERVIX
    GORDON, AJ
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1981, 282 (6273): : 1394 - 1395
  • [49] COMPARISON OF ESTRADIOL AND PROSTAGLANDIN-E2 VAGINAL GEL FOR RIPENING THE UNFAVORABLE CERVIX
    BOND, AP
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1981, 282 (6278): : 1797 - 1798
  • [50] THE EFFICIENCY OF PROSTAGLANDIN-E2 VAGINAL SUPPOSITORIES VERSUS INTRACERVICAL PROSTAGLANDIN GEL FOR INDUCTION OF LABOR IN PATIENTS WITH UNFAVORABLE INDUCIBILITY PROSPECTS
    LEGARTH, J
    GULDBAEK, E
    SCHER, NJ
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1988, 27 (02): : 93 - 98