DOES EARLY ADMINISTRATION OF EPIDURAL ANALGESIA AFFECT OBSTETRIC OUTCOME IN NULLIPAROUS WOMEN WHO ARE IN SPONTANEOUS LABOR

被引:142
|
作者
CHESTNUT, DH
MCGRATH, JM
VINCENT, RD
PENNING, DH
CHOI, WW
BATES, JN
MCFARLANE, C
机构
[1] UNIV IOWA,COLL MED,DEPT ANESTHESIA,IOWA CITY,IA
[2] UNIV IOWA,COLL MED,DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL,IOWA CITY,IA
关键词
ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES; EPIDURAL; ANESTHETICS; LOCAL; BUPIVACAINE; OPIOIDS; NALBUPHINE; PREGNANCY;
D O I
10.1097/00000542-199406000-00006
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Some studies suggest that epidural analgesia prolongs labor and increases the incidence of cesarean section, especially if it is administered before 5 cm cervical dilation. The purpose of the current study was to determine whether early administration of epidural analgesia affects obstetric outcome in nulliparous women who are in spontaneous labor. Methods: Informed consent was obtained from 344 healthy nulliparous women with a singleton fetus in a vertex presentation, who requested epidural analgesia during spontaneous labor at at least 36 weeks' gestation. Each patient was randomized to receive either early or late epidural analgesia. Randomization occurred only after the following conditions were met: (1) the patient requested pain relief at that moment, (2) a lumbar epidural catheter had been placed, and (3) the cervix was at least 3 cm but less than 5 cm dilated. Patients in the early group immediately received epidural bupivacaine analgesia. Patients in the late group received 10 mg nalbuphine intravenously. Late-group patients did not receive epidural analgesia until they achieved a cervical dilation of at least 5 cm or until at least 1 h had elapsed after a second dose of nalbuphine. Ten of the 344 patients were excluded because of a protocol violation or voluntary withdrawal from the study. Results: Early administration of epidural analgesia did not increase the incidence of oxytocin augmentation, prolong the interval between randomization and the diagnosis of complete cervical dilation, or increase the incidence of malposition of the vertex at delivery. Also, early administration of epidural analgesia did not result in an increased incidence of cesarean section or instrumental vaginal delivery. Seventeen (10%) of 172 women in the early group and 13 (8%) of 162 women in the late group underwent cesarean section (relative risk for the early group 1.22; 95% confidence interval 0.62-2.40). Patients in the early group had lower pain scores between 30 and 150 min after randomization. Infants in the late group had lower umbilical arterial and venous blood pH and higher umbilical venous blood carbon dioxide tension measurements at delivery. Conclusions: Early administration of epidural analgesia did not prolong labor, increase the incidence of oxytocin augmentation, or increase the incidence of operative delivery, when compared with intravenous nalbuphine followed by late administration of epidural analgesia, in nulliparous women who were in spontaneous labor at term.
引用
收藏
页码:1201 / 1208
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The effect of epidural analgesia on the occurrence of obstetric lacerations and on the neonatal outcome during spontaneous vaginal delivery
    Bodner-Adler B.
    Bodner K.
    Kimberger O.
    Wagenbichler P.
    Kaider A.
    Husslein P.
    Mayerhofer K.
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2002, 267 (2) : 81 - 84
  • [42] THE EFFECT OF LUMBAR EPIDURAL ANALGESIA ON THE RATE OF CERVICAL DILATATION AND THE OUTCOME OF LABOR OF SPONTANEOUS ONSET
    STUDD, JWW
    CRAWFORD, JS
    DUIGNAN, NM
    ROWBOTHAM, CJF
    HUGHES, AO
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1980, 87 (11): : 1015 - 1021
  • [43] Neuraxial analgesia versus intravenous remifentanil for pain relief in early labor in nulliparous women
    Ismail, Mohamed Taha
    Hassanin, Maher Z.
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2012, 286 (06) : 1375 - 1381
  • [44] Neuraxial analgesia versus intravenous remifentanil for pain relief in early labor in nulliparous women
    Mohamed Taha Ismail
    Maher Z. Hassanin
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2012, 286 : 1375 - 1381
  • [45] Does epidural analgesia influence labor progress in women aged 35 or more?
    Favilli, Alessandro
    Tiburzi, Cinzia
    Gargaglia, Eleonora
    Cerotto, Vittorio
    Bagaphou, Thierry C.
    Checcaglini, Angela
    Bini, Vittorio
    Gori, Fabio
    Torrioli, Donatello
    Gerli, Sandro
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (07): : 1219 - 1223
  • [46] TIMING OF ADMINISTRATION OF EPIDURAL ANALGESIA AND RISK OF OPERATIVE DELIVERY IN NULLIPAROUS WOMEN: A CASE CONTROL RANDOMISED STUDY
    Chattopadhyay, I.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 123 : 244 - 244
  • [47] Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion for Labor Analgesia: The Effects on Maternal Motor Function and Labor Outcome. A Randomized Double-Blind Study in Nulliparous Women
    Capogna, Giorgio
    Camorcia, Michela
    Stirparo, Silvia
    Farcomeni, Alessio
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2011, 113 (04): : 826 - 831
  • [48] Early versus late epidural analgesia and risk of instrumental delivery in nulliparous women: a systematic review
    Wassen, M. M. L. H.
    Zuijlen, J.
    Roumen, F. J. M. E.
    Smits, L. J. M.
    Marcus, M. A.
    Nijhuis, J. G.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (06) : 655 - 661
  • [49] Epidural analgesia in laboring women does not affect fetal heart rate variations
    Storella, RJ
    Shi, Y
    ColonnaRomano, P
    Hoffman, CT
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 : S408 - S408
  • [50] Epidural or combined spinal-epidural labor analgesia does not affect the incidence of cesarean delivery for dystocia or malposition
    Newman, LM
    McCarthy, RJ
    Ivankovich, AD
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 85 (3A) : A857 - A857