Occupational therapy practice community: process evaluation by the participants and researchers

被引:4
|
作者
Galheigo, Sandra Maria [1 ]
Braga, Claudia Pellegrini [1 ]
Risseto Mieto, Fernanda Stella [1 ]
Parreira, Fernanda Viotti [2 ]
Sarmento, Gabrielle Quintiliano [1 ]
Motta, Margareth [3 ]
Abrahao Silva, Mariane Campopiano [4 ]
Santos, Mirella Ferreira [1 ]
Spinola, Priscilla Feres [5 ]
Lima, Raquel [6 ]
de Araujo Mitre, Rosa Maria [7 ]
Olher Lagoa, Thais dos Reis [8 ]
Oliveira, Thelma Almir [9 ]
Santos, Walkyria de Almeida [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Dept Fisioterapia Fonoaudiol & Terapia Ocupac, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Cent Chile, Escuela Terapia Ocupac, Santiago, Chile
[3] Hosp Aeronaut Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Sao Carlos UFSCar, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[5] Ctr Hosp Sistema Penitenciario Estado Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[6] CAPS Infantil Perus, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[7] Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz Fiocruz, Inst Nacl Saude Crianca Mulher & Adolescente Fern, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[8] Hosp Santa Marcelina, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[9] Ctr Univ Sao Camilo, Hosp Geral Carapicuiba, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[10] Inst Oncol Pediat GRAACC, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
来源
关键词
Occupational Therapy; Knowledge; Professional Practice;
D O I
10.4322/0104-4931.ctoAO0471
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This article presents the results of a participatory action research with occupational therapists in a community of practice which purpose was to discuss the care production provided by occupational therapy to hospitalized children and adolescents. The participants were nine occupational therapists from hospitals of the city of Sao Paulo. Ten face-to-face meetings were conducted and a Web-mediated environment was created for conducting virtual activities. The face meetings were recorded and tapped. This article aims to present the evaluation made by the participants and researchers about the process experienced in the community. Through content analysis, seventeen reporting units were identified and grouped into four main themes: the dialogic process; theoretical and practical implications; reflective process; participatory process and its barriers. The process evaluation showed that dialogue during the meetings contributed to a sense of belonging, integration, and awareness/group cohesion and made possible discussing and reflecting on topics relevant to the practice of occupational therapist. Direct communication proved to be the main form of exchange among the professionals in the group. The participants working conditions, the computers and virtual environments access issues, the surplus work generated by meetings and the displacement in urban centers were complicating factors for the participant's greater adhesion. Evaluation showed that this strategy favored the construction of shared knowledge, and its implementation can foster reflection, research development and knowledge production, as well as contribute to the occupational therapist professional practice improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 474
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A process for developing sustainable evidence-based occupational therapy practice
    Sirkka, Marianne
    Zingmark, Karin
    Larsson-Lund, Maria
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2014, 21 (06) : 429 - 437
  • [32] Retaining Participants in Outpatient and Community-Based Health Studies: Researchers and Participants in Their Own Words
    Odierna, Donna H.
    Bero, Lisa A.
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2014, 4 (04):
  • [33] THE EVALUATION PROCESS IN PSYCHIATRIC OCCUPATIONAL-THERAPY - HEMPHILL,BJ
    BARTLOW, PM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 1982, 36 (11): : 750 - 751
  • [34] CLINICAL REASONING IN PSYCHOSOCIAL OCCUPATIONAL-THERAPY - THE EVALUATION PROCESS
    BARRIS, R
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 1987, 7 (03): : 147 - 162
  • [35] Process evaluation of the ‘Grip on Health’ intervention in general and occupational health practice
    Emma Vossen
    Joost W. J. van der Gulden
    Joost A.G.M. van Genabeek
    Rosanne Schaap
    Johannes R. Anema
    Frederieke G. Schaafsma
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 22
  • [36] Process evaluation of the 'Grip on Health' intervention in general and occupational health practice
    Vossen, Emma
    van der Gulden, Joost W. J.
    van Genabeek, Joost A. G. M.
    Schaap, Rosanne
    Anema, Johannes R.
    Schaafsma, Frederieke G.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [37] Occupational therapy practice: Focusing on occupational performance
    Baum, CM
    Law, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 1997, 51 (04): : 277 - 288
  • [38] Community of practice in occupational therapy for mental health on primary care: expectations and impacts
    Marcolino, Tais Quevedo
    Fantinatti, Eliane Nascimento
    Nogueira Fornereto Gozzi, Alana de Paiva
    Barboza Cid, Maria Fernanda
    [J]. CADERNOS DE TERAPIA OCUPACIONAL DA UFSCAR, 2016, 24 (04): : 733 - 741
  • [39] New Community of Practice Platform for Biomedical Researchers
    不详
    [J]. ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2023, 51 (01): : 5 - 5
  • [40] Investigating the experiences in a school-based occupational therapy program to inform community-based paediatric occupational therapy practice
    Rens, Lezahn
    Joosten, Annette
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL, 2014, 61 (03) : 148 - 158