Accuracy of emergency physician performed bedside ultrasound in determining gestational age in first trimester pregnancy

被引:0
|
作者
Saul, Turandot [1 ]
Lewiss, Resa E. [1 ]
Rivera, Marina Del Rios [2 ]
机构
[1] St Lukes Roosevelt Hosp, Emergency Ultrasound Div, Dept Emergency Med, 1000 10th Ave, New York, NY 10019 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Coll Med, Dept Emergency Med, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
Gestational age dating; Bedside ultrasound; First trimester pregnancy;
D O I
10.1186/2036-7902-4-22
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Patient reported menstrual history, physician clinical evaluation, and ultrasonography are used to determine gestational age in the pregnant female. Previous studies have shown that pregnancy dating by last menstrual period (LMP) and physical examination findings can be inaccurate. An ultrasound performed in the radiology department is considered the standard for determining an accurate gestational age. The aim of this study is to determine the accuracy of emergency physician performed bedside ultrasound as an estimation of gestational age (EDUGA) as compared to the radiology department standard. Methods: A prospective convenience sample of ED patients presenting in the first trimester of pregnancy (based upon self-reported LMP) regardless of their presenting complaint were enrolled. EDUGA was compared to gestational age estimated by ultrasound performed in the department of radiology (RGA) as the gold standard. Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlation between EDUGA compared to RGA. Results: Sixty-eight pregnant patients presumed to be in the 1st trimester of pregnancy based upon self-reported LMP consented to enrollment. When excluding the cases with no fetal pole, the median discrepancy of EDUGA versus RGA was 2 days (interquartile range (IQR) 1 to 3.25). The correlation coefficient of EDUGA with RGA was 0.978. When including the six cases without a fetal pole in the data analysis, the median discrepancy of EDUGA compared with RGA was 3 days (IQR 1 to 4). The correlation coefficient of EDUGA with RGA was 0.945. Conclusion: Based on our comparison of EDUGA to RGA in patients presenting to the ED in the first trimester of pregnancy, we conclude that emergency physicians are capable of accurately performing this measurement. Emergency physicians should consider using ultrasound to estimate gestational age as it may be useful for the future care of that pregnant patient.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Influence of maternal body mass index and gestational age on accuracy of first trimester gender assignment
    Behrendt, Nicholas
    Foy, Pamela
    Center, Jennifer
    Durnwald, Celeste P.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2012, 25 (03): : 253 - 256
  • [42] Ultrasound evaluation of first trimester pregnancy complications
    Morin, L
    Van den Hof, MC
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2006, 93 (01) : 77 - 81
  • [43] Particularities of the First Trimester Ultrasound in Twin Pregnancy
    Burnei-Rusu, Anca
    Cotman, Reli
    Zamfirescu, Vlad
    Traistaru, Andrei
    Cristea, Carmen
    Bot, Mihaela
    Vladareanu, Radu
    5TH ROMANIAN CONGRESS OF THE ROMANIAN SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, : 150 - 154
  • [44] Ultrasound Evaluation of First Trimester Pregnancy Complications
    Morin, Lucie
    Van den Hof, Michiel C.
    Bly, Stephen
    Farquharson, Duncan
    Lewthwaite, Barbara
    Gagnon, Robert
    Salem, Shia
    Skoll, Amanda
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2005, 27 (06) : 581 - 585
  • [45] Ultrasound Evaluation of First Trimester Complications of Pregnancy
    Morin, Lucie
    Cargill, Yvonne M.
    Glanc, Phyllis
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2016, 38 (10) : 982 - 988
  • [46] First Trimester - Ultrasound Ectopic Pregnancy Localizations
    Schmidt, M.
    Sina, F.
    Kuhn, U.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GEBURTSHILFE UND NEONATOLOGIE, 2014, 218 (05): : 226 - 227
  • [47] Can Prenatal Testing in the First Trimester be Performed without Ultrasound?
    Merz, E.
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2017, 38 (02): : 126 - 128
  • [48] Comparison of gestational age at birth based on last menstrual period and ultrasound during the first trimester
    Hoffman, Caroline S.
    Messer, Lynne C.
    Mendola, Pauline
    Savitz, David A.
    Herring, Amy H.
    Hartmann, Katherine E.
    PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 22 (06) : 587 - 596
  • [49] Clinical evaluation of a first trimester pregnancy algorithm predicting the risk of small for gestational age neonates
    Graham, Kathryn
    Park, Felicity
    McLennan, Andrew
    Pelosi, Marilena
    Williams, Paul
    Poon, Liona C.
    Hyett, Jon
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 59 (05): : 670 - 676
  • [50] Magnetic resonance imaging of first trimester pregnancy: expected intrauterine contents in relation to gestational age
    Viets, Zachary J.
    Raptis, Constantine A.
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Hildebolt, Charles F.
    Yano, Motoyo
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 42 (09) : 2334 - 2339