CONTROL OF POSTHARVEST BROWN-ROT OF NECTARINES AND PEACHES BY PSEUDOMONAS SPECIES

被引:68
|
作者
SMILANICK, JL
DENISARRUE, R
BOSCH, JR
GONZALEZ, AR
HENSON, D
JANISIEWICZ, WJ
机构
[1] UNIV ARKANSAS, DEPT FOOD SCI, FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72703 USA
[2] USDA ARS, APPALACHIAN FRUIT RES CTR, KEARNEYSVILLE, WV 25430 USA
关键词
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; MONILINIA-FRUCTICOLA; PSEUDOMONAS-CEPACIA; PSEUDOMONAS-CORRUGATA; BACILLUS-SUBTILIS;
D O I
10.1016/0261-2194(93)90092-W
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Microbes were applied to nectarines and peaches to control postharvest brown rot caused by Monilinia fructicola. Two yeasts applied to wounds on fruit before inoculation protected fruit from subsequent infection, but they could not control decay when applied after inoculation. Two antibiotic-producing bacteria, Pseudomonas corrugata and P. cepacia, significantly reduced decay when applied up to 12 h after inoculation. P. corrugata controlled decay with fewer colony-forming units (c.f.u.) than P. cepacia; <10(4) c.f.u. per wound of P. corrugata controlled decay, whereas P. cepacia required greater-than-or-equal-to 10(5) c.f.u. per wound. Both antagonists grew rapidly in wounds but not on the intact surface of fruit. Washed cells controlled decay but filter-sterilized culture fluids did not. Both bacteria controlled the decay of wound-inoculated peaches better than thiabendazole, and P. corrugata was only slightly inferior to triforine. In tests employing very high inoculum densities of M. fructicola, both pseudomonads significantly reduced decay but were inferior to isolate B-3 of Bacillus subtilis. Decay was poorly controlled by the pseudomonads in tests with commercial fruit that was not artificially inoculated. Infections characteristic of commercially grown fruit were not accurately simulated by the artificial inoculation methods used to select antagonists. Revised strategies to control brown rot by microbial antagonists are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:513 / 520
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [43] RHIZOPUS ROT OF PEACHES AS AFFECTED BY POSTHARVEST TEMPERATURE AND MOISTURE
    SMITH, WL
    MCCLURE, TT
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1960, 50 (07) : 558 - 562
  • [44] CONTROL OF BROWN ROT AND RHIZOPUS ROT OF INOCULATED PEACHES WITH HOT WATER OR HOT CHEMICAL SUSPENSIONS
    SMITH, WL
    PLANT DISEASE REPORTER, 1971, 55 (03): : 228 - &
  • [45] Postharvest management of gray mold and brown rot on surfaces of peaches and grapes using electrolyzed oxidizing water
    Guentzel, Jane L.
    Lam, Kang Liang
    Callan, Michael A.
    Emmons, Stuart A.
    Dunham, Valgene L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 143 (1-2) : 54 - 60
  • [46] Mechanism of brown-rot decay: Paradigm or paradox
    Green, F
    Highley, TL
    INTERNATIONAL BIODETERIORATION & BIODEGRADATION, 1997, 39 (2-3) : 113 - 124
  • [47] Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of brown-rot control strategies - Development of a bio-economic model of brown-rot prevalence in the Dutch potato production chain
    Breukers, Annemarie
    Mourits, Monique
    Van der Werf, Wopke
    Kettenis, Dirk L.
    lansink, Alfons OuDe
    NEW APPROACHES TO THE ECONOMICS OF PLANT HEALTH, 2007, 20 : 57 - 70
  • [48] Presence of the European brown-rot fungus in America
    Ezekiel, WN
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1925, 15 (09) : 535 - 542
  • [49] POSTHARVEST MUCOR ROT CONTROL ON APPLES WITH PSEUDOMONAS-CEPACIA
    JANISIEWICZ, WJ
    ROITMAN, J
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1987, 77 (12) : 1776 - 1776
  • [50] Breeding Peaches for Brown Rot Resistance in Embrapa
    Dini, Maximiliano
    Bassols Raseira, Maria do Carmo
    Scariotto, Silvia
    Ueno, Bernardo
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (10):