Ketorolac tromethamine 0.4% to relieve eye pain and inflammation following cataract extraction and keratorefractive surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Sandoval, Helga P. [1 ]
Solomon, Kerry D. [2 ]
机构
[1] MUSC Storm Eye Inst, Magill Res Ctr Vis Correct, 167 Ashley Ave, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] Med Univ South Carolina, Storm Eye Inst, Magill Res Ctr Vis Correct, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
关键词
eye; inflammation; ketorolac; NSAID; ocular; pain;
D O I
10.1586/EOP.09.35
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic solution, a NSAID, demonstrated analgesic activity when administered systemically. The original 0.5% formulation was shown to reduce inflammation and pain, as well as general discomfort after cataract and keratorefractive surgery. A reformulation that contains 20% less active ingredient than the original was approved for the reduction of ocular pain and burning/stinging following corneal refractive surgery. Ketorolac tromethamine 0.4% is as effective as ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% to control inflammation after cataract surgery (including prevention of cystoid macular edema) as shown in different clinical trials. Comparisons to other NSAIDs for pain control after keratorefractive procedures, such as laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy, have also been reported. The purpose of this study was to review the action of ketorolac tromethamine 0.4% in the relief of eye pain and inflammation after cataract extraction and keratorefractive surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 468
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] TREATMENT OF MAJOR INFLAMMATION FOLLOWING CATARACT-SURGERY
    SCHNITZKEWITZ, G
    TAVAKOLIAN, U
    WOLLENSAK, J
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 1987, 190 (03) : 223 - 224
  • [42] Intracameral ketorolac and phenylephrine effect on intraoperative pupil diameter and postoperative pain in cataract surgery
    Donnenfeld, Eric D.
    Whitaker, J. Steven
    Jackson, Mitchell A.
    Wittpenn, John
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 43 (05): : 597 - 605
  • [43] Comparison of prednisolone 1%, rimexolone 1% and ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% after cataract extraction -: A prospective, randomized, double-masked study
    Hirneiss, C
    Neubauer, AS
    Kampik, A
    Schönfeld, CL
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 243 (08) : 768 - 773
  • [44] PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS (PK/PD) OF KETOROLAC TROMETHAMINE(KT) IM AND IV FOLLOWING MAJOR ORTHOPEDIC-SURGERY
    BROWN, CR
    MOODIE, JE
    PHILLIPS, E
    JUNG, D
    MCHUGH, DP
    MROSZCZAK, EJ
    PRATHIKANTI, R
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1993, 53 (02) : 222 - 222
  • [45] KETOROLAC AND DICLOFENAC FOR POSTOPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF FOLLOWING ORAL-SURGERY
    WALTON, GM
    ROOD, JP
    SNOWDON, AT
    RICKWOOD, D
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1993, 31 (03): : 158 - 160
  • [46] Postoperative infection following current cataract extraction surgery
    Kanellopoulos, AJ
    Dreyer, EB
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY CLINICS, 1996, 36 (03) : 97 - 107
  • [47] Tramadol Versus Ketorolac in the Treatment of Postoperative Pain Following Maxillofacial Surgery
    Manjunath Shankariah
    Madan Mishra
    Rajay A. D. Kamath
    Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2012, 11 (3) : 264 - 270
  • [48] Tramadol Versus Ketorolac in the Treatment of Postoperative Pain Following Maxillofacial Surgery
    Shankariah, Manjunath
    Mishra, Madan
    Kamath, Rajay A. D.
    JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2012, 11 (03): : 264 - 270
  • [49] Comparative effects of ketorolac 0.5% or diclofenac 0.1% ophthalmic solutions on inflammation after cataract surgery
    Flach, AJ
    Dolan, BJ
    Donahue, ME
    Faktorovich, EG
    Gonzalez, GA
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 105 (09) : 1775 - 1779
  • [50] Topical Bromfenac 0.09% vs Ketorolac 0.4% for the Control of Pain, Photophobia, and Discomfort Following PRK
    Sher, Neal A.
    Golben, Mikhail P.
    Bond, William
    Trattler, William B.
    Tauber, Shachar
    Voirin, Terry G.
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 25 (02) : 214 - 220