COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF OXAPROZIN AND NABUMETONE IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE

被引:22
|
作者
WEAVER, A
RUBIN, B
CALDWELL, J
MCMAHON, FG
LEE, D
MAKAROWSKI, W
OFFENBERG, H
SACK, M
SIKES, D
TRAPP, R
RUSH, S
KUSS, M
GANJU, J
BOCANEGRA, TS
机构
[1] Arthritis Center of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
[2] University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX
[3] Gainesville Clinical Research Center, Gainesville, FL
[4] Clinical Research Center, New Orleans, LA
[5] Walker Clinical Evaluations, Inc., Indianapolis, IN
[6] Rheumatology Associates, Erie, PA
[7] Halifax Clinical Research Center, Daytona Beach, FL
[8] Center for Clinical Research, Austin, TX
[9] Florida Medical Clinic, Zephyrhills, FL
[10] Arthritis Center, Springfield, IL
[11] G.D. Searle and Co., Skokie, IL
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0149-2918(95)80050-6
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
This multicenter, 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study compared the efficacy and safety of oxaprozin 1200 mg once daily with that of nabumetone 1000 mg once daily in patients with moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. To be eligible, patients had to experience a flare of OA within 2 weeks of discontinuing their usual OA medication (nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug or analgesic). Eligible patients were assessed at baseline and then randomized to receive oxaprozin (n = 109), nabumetone (n = 110), or placebo (n = 109). Efficacy assessments were performed at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6. Primary efficacy variables included knee pain on weight bearing, knee pain on motion, and patient's and physician's global assessments of OA. Secondary efficacy variables included pain intensity, time to walk 50 feet, and duration of morning stiffness. Safety was evaluated by use of routine laboratory analyses; physical examination at screening, baseline, and week 6 (or study termination); assessment of symptoms at baseline and at each visit; and testing stools for occult blood at screening and between week 4 and the final visit. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. Between-group differences in efficacy variables were evident by week 1. The mean change in improvement from baseline with oxaprozin compared with placebo was statistically significant in favor of oxaprozin at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6 for all primary efficacy variables. The mean change in improvement from baseline with nabumetone compared with placebo, however, was statistically significant only at week 1 for knee pain on motion, patient's global assessment, and physician's global assessment. The mean change in improvement from baseline was statistically significant (P less than or equal to 0.035) in favor of oxaprozin versus nabumetone at weeks 2 and 6 for all four primary efficacy variables and also at week 4 for knee pain on motion. The incidence of adverse clinical events between treatment groups was not statistically significant. However, nine oxaprozin-treated patients had asymptomatic liver enzyme elevations re; ported as adverse events. Four of these patients had reversible elevations of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase greater than three times the upper limit of normal range (P < 0.05); two of these patients were taking other medications known to induce liver enzyme abnormalities. The study showed that oxaprozin 1200 mg once daily was statistically significantly more efficacious than nabumetone 1000 mg once daily for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe OA of the knee. Both drugs were clinically well tolerated.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 745
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacy and safety of eltenac gel in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis
    Ottillinger, B
    Gömör, B
    Michel, BA
    Pavelka, K
    Beck, W
    Elsasser, U
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2001, 9 (03) : 273 - 280
  • [22] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF STRONTIUM RANELATE IN THE TREATMENT OF KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS
    Myasoutova, L.
    Lapshina, S.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2014, 73 : 1067 - 1067
  • [23] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF STRONTIUM RANELATE IN THE TREATMENT OF KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS
    Lapshina, S.
    Myasoutova, L.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 25 : S401 - S401
  • [24] Efficacy and safety of topical nimesulide in the treatment of knee Osteoarthritis
    Erguen, Hakan
    Kuelcue, Duygu
    Kutlay, Sehim
    Bodur, Hatice
    Tulunay, Faik Cankat
    JCR-JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2007, 13 (05) : 251 - 255
  • [25] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF NABUMETONE IN 5421 PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE HIP AND OR KNEE JOINTS - A SUBGROUP EVALUATION OF AN OUTPATIENT STUDY INVOLVING 18 047 PATIENTS
    FEDDER, M
    STROEHMANN, I
    DRUGS, 1990, 40 : 75 - 77
  • [26] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS TREATMENT WITH KETOROLAC TROMETAMINE GEL IN ELDERLY PATIENTS
    Povoroznyuk, V.
    Grygorieva, N.
    Bystrytska, M.
    Kovtun, T.
    Pidlisetskiy, A.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2018, 26 : S307 - S308
  • [27] CLINICAL EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF NABUMETONE IN RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS AND OSTEOARTHRITIS
    FLEISCHMANN, RM
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1992, 19 : 32 - 40
  • [28] Efficacy and safety of rofecoxib 12.5 mg versus nabumetone 1,000 mg in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: A randomized controlled trial
    Kivitz, AJ
    Greenwald, MW
    Cohen, SB
    Polis, AB
    Najarian, DK
    Dixon, ME
    Moidel, RA
    Green, JA
    Baraf, HSB
    Petruschke, RA
    Matsumoto, AK
    Geba, GP
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2004, 52 (05) : 666 - 674
  • [29] Treatment of patients with osteoarthritis with rofecoxib compared with nabumetone
    Weaver, AL
    Messner, RP
    Storms, WW
    Polis, AB
    Najarian, DK
    Petruschke, RA
    Geba, GP
    Tershakovec, AM
    JCR-JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2006, 12 (01) : 17 - 25
  • [30] Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Tanezumab for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee
    Schnitzer, Thomas
    Easton, Richard
    Pang, Shirley
    Levinson, Dennis
    Pixton, Glenn
    Viktrup, Lars
    Davignon, Isabelle
    Brown, Mark
    Verburg, Kenneth
    West, Christine
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2019, 46 (07) : 785 - 786