AUTOMATION IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL ANALYSIS LABORATORY - A CENTRALIZED DECENTRALIZED APPROACH

被引:1
|
作者
SCYPINSKI, S
NELSON, L
SADLOWSKI, T
机构
[1] Pharmaceutical Analysis Research and Development, Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., Nutley
来源
JOURNAL OF AUTOMATIC CHEMISTRY | 1995年 / 17卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1155/S1463924695000071
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
It has been over 10 years since robots have appeared in the pharmaceutical analysis laboratory. In the early days, it was common for one selected individual to be responsible for the programming, usage and maintenance of the robots(s). However, the increasing use of robotics has prompted the formation of robotics 'laboratories' and/or 'groups'. This is especially true when multiple robotic systems and applications are involved. Over the past several years at ISLAR, many champions of robotics have given presentations on the setup and usage of robotics within their organizations. These managers have described both the 'centralized' and 'decentralized' approaches to the implementation of robotics. In the centralized system, a single group is charged with all aspects of the robotic project, including justification, purchase, validation, use and maintenance. Under such an arrangement, samples are usually given to the robotics group for analysis. In contrast, a totally decentralized approach to robotics would have units interspersed throughout the organization, with each individual group responsible for their respective unit(s), in much the same way as liquid chromatographs are considered. At Hoffmann-La Roche, aspects of both the centralized and decentralized approaches to robotics are used which make our combined system the 'best of both worlds'. This paper describes the Roche philosophy towards robotics and highlights the advantages to the system used.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 49
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Decentralized borrowing and centralized default
    Kim, Yun Jung
    Zhang, Jing
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 88 (01) : 121 - 133
  • [32] COMPARISON OF CENTRALIZED AND DECENTRALIZED ECONOMIES
    MARSCHAK, T
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1969, 59 (02): : 525 - 537
  • [33] Decentralized Mining in Centralized Pools
    Cong, Lin William
    He, Zhiguo
    Li, Jiasun
    REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2021, 34 (03): : 1191 - 1235
  • [34] Reliability Analysis of Microgrids: Evaluation of Centralized and Decentralized Control Approaches
    Garip, Selahattin
    Bilgen, Melih
    Altin, Necmi
    Ozdemir, Saban
    Sefa, Ibrahim
    ELECTRIC POWER COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS, 2023, 51 (19) : 2319 - 2338
  • [35] Centralized vs Decentralized Resource Analysis of Green FiWi Networks
    Kumar, Kinshu
    Gupta, Akshita
    Bohara, Vivek Ashok
    Srivastava, Anand
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED NETWORKS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS (IEEE ANTS), 2021,
  • [36] CENTRALIZED OR DECENTRALIZED CIP SANIFICATION
    DAMEROW, G
    INDUSTRIE ALIMENTARI, 1983, 22 (09): : 669 - 670
  • [37] Centralized or decentralized: Philosophical considerations
    Robinson, EAE
    VOX SANGUINIS, 1998, 74 : 535 - 537
  • [38] CENTRALIZED TRAINING IN A DECENTRALIZED ORGANIZATION
    TOVAR, RT
    ROSSETT, A
    CARTER, N
    TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 1989, 43 (02): : 62 - 65
  • [39] Centralized vs decentralized contests
    Bevia, Carmen
    Corchon, Luis C.
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2015, 137 : 32 - 35
  • [40] Laboratory automation - some perspectives on the challenges in the implementation of the technology in pharmaceutical development
    North, N
    Smith, S
    JOURNAL OF AUTOMATIC CHEMISTRY, 1998, 20 (04): : 111 - 115