Assessment of acute pain in children: development of evidence-based guidelines

被引:27
|
作者
Stapelkamp, Ceilidh [1 ]
Carter, Bernie [2 ,3 ]
Gordon, Jenny [4 ]
Watts, Chris [4 ]
机构
[1] Bazian, London, England
[2] Univ Cent Lancashire, Preston, Lancs, England
[3] Alder Hey Childrens NHS Fdn Trust, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[4] Royal Coll Nursing, Evidence Practice, Oxford, England
关键词
children's health; evidence-based practice; infant health; pain management; systematic review;
D O I
10.1111/j.1744-1609.2010.00199.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim Detecting children's pain in a healthcare setting can be improved by facilitating pain expression in ways that are appropriate to the child's cognitive development and that can be recognised by their carers. To ensure up-to-date guidance on assessing pain in children, the Royal College of Nursing undertook an evidence-based update of pain assessment guidelines, initially published in 2000. Methods Following systematic review of the psychometric testing literature, a two-stage critical appraisal process was developed to derive a list of robust tools that could be recommended for use in a variety of settings to assess the intensity of a child's acute pain. Studies were appraised on the basis of their relevance to this topic and according to prespecified quality criteria. Tools were assessed for inclusion in guideline recommendations according to minimum validity and reliability thresholds. Results Overall the quality of literature was poor, limited by small samples, lack of control groups, unblinded raters and convenience sampling. Twenty-four tools are recommended for use with infants and verbal children without cognitive impairment, 11 of which are purely self-report tools. Eight tools are recommended for use with neonates, some of which require concurrent physiological measures. Four tools are considered valid for use in children with cognitive impairment. All of these tools had shown reliability and validity according to the criteria established for this review. Conclusion The tools are presented in user-friendly tables that include a guide to their key features and the setting and age groups in which they have been validated. They are accompanied by good practice recommendations from experts and recommendations relating to timing and triggers for pain assessment. These outputs are some of those associated with the full guidelines and supporting material published on the Royal College of Nursing website (http://www.rcn.org.uk/childrenspainguideline).
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 50
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pain, Pain, Go Away! Evidence-Based Review of Developmentally Appropriate Pain Assessment for Children in a Postoperative Setting
    Joestlein, Lisa
    ORTHOPAEDIC NURSING, 2015, 34 (05) : 252 - 259
  • [32] Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Interventional Pain Management in Cancer Pain
    Bhatnagar, Sushma
    Gupta, Maynak
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2015, 21 (02) : 137 - 147
  • [33] How evidence-based are the recommendations in evidence-based guidelines?
    McAlister, Finlay A.
    van Diepen, Sean
    Padwal, Rajdeep S.
    Johnson, Jeffrey A.
    Majumdar, Sumit R.
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2007, 4 (08) : 1325 - 1332
  • [34] An evidence-based approach to the development of national dietary guidelines
    Cooper, MJ
    Zlotkin, SH
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 2003, 103 (12) : S28 - S33
  • [36] The development of evidence-based guidelines for erythropoietin use.
    Stoffel, JA
    Castelli, EE
    Skledar, SJ
    Guttendorf, S
    Steffenhagen, AL
    Hall, DL
    Schonder, K
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2002, 22 (10): : 1377 - 1377
  • [37] Development of evidence-based practice guidelines: Committee update
    Frattali, C
    Bayles, K
    Beeson, P
    Kennedy, MRT
    Wambaugh, J
    Yorkston, KM
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2003, 11 (03) : IX - XVII
  • [38] Development of evidence-based guidelines in midwifery and gynaecology nursing
    Webster, J
    Lloyd, WC
    Pritchard, MA
    Burridge, CA
    Plucknett, LE
    Byrne, AJ
    MIDWIFERY, 1999, 15 (01) : 2 - 5
  • [39] Methodology for the development of NHS Plus evidence-based guidelines
    Madan, Ira
    Paterson, Susan
    Harling, Kit
    OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2007, 57 (05): : 304 - 307
  • [40] Development and Use of Gerontological Evidence-Based Practice Guidelines
    Butcher, Howard K.
    JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGICAL NURSING, 2016, 42 (07): : 25 - 32