INPUTS, TRANSFORMATIONS, AND TRANSPORT OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS IN CHESAPEAKE BAY AND SELECTED TRIBUTARIES

被引:428
|
作者
BOYNTON, WR
GARBER, JH
SUMMERS, R
KEMP, WM
机构
[1] US EPA,NARRAGANSETT LAB,NARRAGANSETT,RI 02882
[2] CHESAPEAKE BAY SPECIAL PROJECTS,MARYLAND DEPT ENVIRONM,BALTIMORE,MD 21224
[3] UNIV MARYLAND SYST,CTR ENVIRONM & ESTUARINE STUDIES,HORN POINT ENVIRONM LAB,CAMBRIDGE,MD 21613
来源
ESTUARIES | 1995年 / 18卷 / 1B期
关键词
D O I
10.2307/1352640
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this paper we assemble and analyze quantitative annual input-export budgets for total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) for Chesapeake Bay and three of its tributary estuaries (Potomac, Patuxent, and Choptank rivers). The budgets include estimates of TN and TP sources (point, diffuse, and atmospheric), internal losses (burial in sediments, fisheries yields, and denitrification), storages in the water column and sediments, internal cycling rates (zooplankton excretion and net sediment-water flux), and net downstream exchange. Annual terrestrial and atmospheric inputs (average of 1985 and 1986 data) of TN and TP ranged from 4.3 g TN m(-2) yr(-1) to 29.3 g TN m(-2) yr(-1) and 0.32 g TP m(-2) yr(-1) to 2.42 g TP m-P yr(-1), respectively. These rates of TN and TP input represent 6-fold to and fold and 13-fold to 24-fold increases in loads to these systems since the precolonial period. A recent 11-yr record for the Susquehanna River indicates that annual loads of TN and TP have varied by about 2-fold and 4-fold, respectively. TN inputs increased and TP inputs decreased during the ll-yr period. The relative importance of nutrient sources varied among these estuaries: point sources of nutrients delivered about half the annual TN and TP load to the Patuxent and nearly 60% of TP inputs to the Choptank; diffuse sources contributed 60-70% of the TN and TP inputs to the mainstream Chesapeake and Potomac River. The direct deposition of atmospheric wet-fall to the surface waters of these estuaries represented 12% or less of annual TN and TP loads except in the Choptank River (37% of TN and 20% of TP). We found direct; although damped, relationships between annual rates of nutrient input, water-column and sediment nutrient stocks, and nutrient losses via burial in sediments and denitrification. Our budgets indicate that the annual mass balance of TN and TP is maintained by a net landward exchange of TP and, with one exception (Choptank River), a net seaward transport of TN. The budgets for all systems revealed that inorganic nutrients entering these estuaries from terrestrial and atmospheric sources are rapidly converted to particulate and organic forms. Discrepancies between our budgets and others in the literature were resolved by the inclusion of sediments derived from shoreline erosion. The greatest potential for errors in our budgets can be attributed to the absence of or uncertainties in estimates of atmospheric dry-fall, contributions of nutrients via groundwater, and the sedimentation rates used to calculate nutrient burial rates.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 314
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transport and Fate of Particulate Organic Nitrogen in Chesapeake Bay: a Numerical Study
    Hao Wang
    Raleigh Hood
    Estuaries and Coasts, 2022, 45 : 2387 - 2413
  • [32] THE EFFECT OF BEST MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES ON NITROGEN TRANSPORT INTO CHESAPEAKE BAY
    STAVER, K
    STEVENSON, JC
    BRINSFIELD, R
    TOXIC SUBSTANCES IN AGRICULTURAL WATER SUPPLY AND DRAINAGE: AN INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL PERSPECTIVE, 1989, : 163 - 179
  • [33] Phosphorus loads to the Chesapeake Bay: A perspective
    Lung, W.-S.
    Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, 1986, 58 (07): : 749 - 756
  • [34] Phytoplankton reference communities for Chesapeake Bay and its tidal tributaries
    Buchanan, C
    Lacouture, RV
    Marshall, HG
    Olson, M
    Johnson, JM
    ESTUARIES, 2005, 28 (01): : 138 - 159
  • [35] Phosphorus and the Chesapeake Bay - Opening remarks
    Matuszeski, W
    AGRICULTURE AND PHOSPHORUS MANAGEMENT: THE CHESAPEAKE BAY, 2000, : 3 - 5
  • [36] Phytoplankton reference communities for Chesapeake Bay and its tidal tributaries
    Claire Buchanan
    Richard V. Lacouture
    Harold G. Marshall
    Marcia Olson
    Jacqueline M. Johnson
    Estuaries, 2005, 28 : 138 - 159
  • [37] Sterol compounds in agricultural runoff into Chesapeake Bay tributaries.
    Huff, TB
    Foster, GD
    Miller, GV
    Lauer, K
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 221 : U59 - U59
  • [38] STANDING CROPS OF MARSH VEGETATION OF 2 TRIBUTARIES OF CHESAPEAKE BAY
    FLEMER, DA
    HEINLE, DR
    KEEFE, CW
    HAMILTON, DH
    ESTUARIES, 1978, 1 (03): : 157 - 163
  • [39] Nutrient and solids controls in Virginia's Chesapeake Bay tributaries
    Cerco, CF
    Linker, L
    Sweeney, J
    Shenk, G
    Butt, AJ
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 128 (03) : 179 - 189
  • [40] Inputs, losses and transformations of nitrogen and phosphorus in the pelagic North Atlantic Ocean
    Michaels, AF
    Olson, D
    Sarmiento, JL
    Ammerman, JW
    Fanning, K
    Jahnke, R
    Knap, AH
    Lipschultz, F
    Prospero, JM
    BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, 1996, 35 (01) : 181 - 226