INPUTS, TRANSFORMATIONS, AND TRANSPORT OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS IN CHESAPEAKE BAY AND SELECTED TRIBUTARIES

被引:428
|
作者
BOYNTON, WR
GARBER, JH
SUMMERS, R
KEMP, WM
机构
[1] US EPA,NARRAGANSETT LAB,NARRAGANSETT,RI 02882
[2] CHESAPEAKE BAY SPECIAL PROJECTS,MARYLAND DEPT ENVIRONM,BALTIMORE,MD 21224
[3] UNIV MARYLAND SYST,CTR ENVIRONM & ESTUARINE STUDIES,HORN POINT ENVIRONM LAB,CAMBRIDGE,MD 21613
来源
ESTUARIES | 1995年 / 18卷 / 1B期
关键词
D O I
10.2307/1352640
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this paper we assemble and analyze quantitative annual input-export budgets for total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) for Chesapeake Bay and three of its tributary estuaries (Potomac, Patuxent, and Choptank rivers). The budgets include estimates of TN and TP sources (point, diffuse, and atmospheric), internal losses (burial in sediments, fisheries yields, and denitrification), storages in the water column and sediments, internal cycling rates (zooplankton excretion and net sediment-water flux), and net downstream exchange. Annual terrestrial and atmospheric inputs (average of 1985 and 1986 data) of TN and TP ranged from 4.3 g TN m(-2) yr(-1) to 29.3 g TN m(-2) yr(-1) and 0.32 g TP m(-2) yr(-1) to 2.42 g TP m-P yr(-1), respectively. These rates of TN and TP input represent 6-fold to and fold and 13-fold to 24-fold increases in loads to these systems since the precolonial period. A recent 11-yr record for the Susquehanna River indicates that annual loads of TN and TP have varied by about 2-fold and 4-fold, respectively. TN inputs increased and TP inputs decreased during the ll-yr period. The relative importance of nutrient sources varied among these estuaries: point sources of nutrients delivered about half the annual TN and TP load to the Patuxent and nearly 60% of TP inputs to the Choptank; diffuse sources contributed 60-70% of the TN and TP inputs to the mainstream Chesapeake and Potomac River. The direct deposition of atmospheric wet-fall to the surface waters of these estuaries represented 12% or less of annual TN and TP loads except in the Choptank River (37% of TN and 20% of TP). We found direct; although damped, relationships between annual rates of nutrient input, water-column and sediment nutrient stocks, and nutrient losses via burial in sediments and denitrification. Our budgets indicate that the annual mass balance of TN and TP is maintained by a net landward exchange of TP and, with one exception (Choptank River), a net seaward transport of TN. The budgets for all systems revealed that inorganic nutrients entering these estuaries from terrestrial and atmospheric sources are rapidly converted to particulate and organic forms. Discrepancies between our budgets and others in the literature were resolved by the inclusion of sediments derived from shoreline erosion. The greatest potential for errors in our budgets can be attributed to the absence of or uncertainties in estimates of atmospheric dry-fall, contributions of nutrients via groundwater, and the sedimentation rates used to calculate nutrient burial rates.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 314
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sedimentation in floodplains of selected tributaries of the Chesapeake Bay
    Rossl, KM
    Hupp, CR
    Howard, AD
    RIPARIAN VEGETATION AND FLUVIAL GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2004, 8 : 187 - 208
  • [2] Inputs of phosphorus to the Chesapeake Bay watershed
    Taylor, AW
    Pionke, HB
    AGRICULTURE AND PHOSPHORUS MANAGEMENT: THE CHESAPEAKE BAY, 2000, : 7 - 21
  • [3] Toward Explaining Nitrogen and Phosphorus Trends in Chesapeake Bay Tributaries, 1992-2012
    Ator, Scott W.
    Garcia, Ana Maria
    Schwarz, Gregory E.
    Blomquist, Joel D.
    Sekellick, Andrew J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2019, 55 (05): : 1149 - 1168
  • [5] TRACE-METAL TRANSPORT IN 2 TRIBUTARIES OF THE UPPER CHESAPEAKE BAY
    DELFINO, JJ
    OTTO, RG
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1985, 189 (APR-): : 108 - GEOC
  • [6] Alkalinity in Tidal Tributaries of the Chesapeake Bay
    Najjar, Raymond G.
    Herrmann, Maria
    Del Valle, Sebastian M. Cintron
    Friedman, Jaclyn R.
    Friedrichs, Marjorie A. M.
    Harris, Lora A.
    Shadwick, Elizabeth H.
    Stets, Edward G.
    Woodland, Ryan J.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2020, 125 (01)
  • [7] Reproductive health of yellow perch Perca flavescens in selected tributaries of the Chesapeake Bay
    Blazer, Vicki S.
    Pinkney, Alfred E.
    Jenkins, Jill A.
    Iwanowicz, Luke R.
    Minkkinen, Steven
    Draugelis-Dale, Rassa O.
    Uphoff, James H.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 447 : 198 - 209
  • [8] The fate and transport of mercury, methylmercury, and other trace metals in Chesapeake Bay tributaries
    Lawson, NM
    Mason, RP
    Laporte, JM
    WATER RESEARCH, 2001, 35 (02) : 501 - 515
  • [9] Endocrine disrupter - estradiol - in Chesapeake Bay tributaries
    Dorabawila, N
    Gupta, G
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2005, 120 (1-3) : 67 - 71
  • [10] SEARCH FOR LINURON RESIDUES IN TRIBUTARIES OF THE CHESAPEAKE BAY
    ZAHNOW, EW
    RIGGLEMAN, JD
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1980, 28 (05) : 974 - 978