FORFEITURE OF ATTORNEYS FEES UNDER RICO AND CCE

被引：0

|

作者：

MCCAY, F

机构：

来源：

FORDHAM LAW REVIEW | 1986年 / 54卷 / 06期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：1171 / 1193

页数：23

相关论文

共 50 条

[41] SURETY LIABILITY FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND COURT COSTS UNDER FIDELITY BONDS
HULL, FM
[J]. FORUM-AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, 1979, 14 (03): : 634 - 656
[42] SUPREME-COURT RULES THAT ATTORNEYS FEES ARE NOT RECOVERABLE UNDER CERCLA
不详
[J]. HAZARDOUS WASTE CONSULTANT, 1994, 12 (05) : C1 - C2
[43] RECOVERY OF ATTORNEYS FEES UNDER RULE 10B-5
SCHMIDT, DR
[J]. NOTRE DAME LAWYER, 1977, 53 (02): : 320 - 345
[44] RICO FORFEITURE - SECURED LENDERS BEWARE
SKORCZ, EA
[J]. UCLA LAW REVIEW, 1990, 37 (06) : 1199 - 1246
[45] RICO FORFEITURE IN PRACTICE - A PROSECUTORIAL PERSPECTIVE
WEBB, DK
TUROW, SF
[J]. UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI LAW REVIEW, 1983, 52 (02) : 404 - 430
[46] FORFEITURE OF LEGAL FEES - WHO STANDS TO LOSE
BLAKEY, GR
[J]. EMORY LAW JOURNAL, 1987, 36 (03) : 781 - 791
[47] DEDUCTIBILITY OF ATTORNEYS FEES - NEW DEVELOPMENTS
BARNETT, LJ
[J]. AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1973, 59 (JUN): : 661 - 663
[48] ATTORNEYS FEES IN COMMON FUND ACTIONS
LAPOINTE, M
[J]. FORDHAM LAW REVIEW, 1991, 59 (05) : 843 - 876
[49] STIPULATED ATTORNEYS FEES - A COMPROMISING POSITION
FILO, TA
[J]. LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW, 1986, 47 (01): : 153 - 167
[50] DEFICIENCY NOTICE IS BASIS FOR ATTORNEYS FEES
不详
[J]. JOURNAL OF TAXATION, 1988, 69 (05): : 364 - 364

← 1 2 3 4 5 →