A REVIEW OF THE DRIFT AND ACTIVITY RESPONSES OF STREAM PREY TO PREDATOR PRESENCE

被引:124
|
作者
WOOSTER, D
SIH, A
机构
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3545718
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In streams the impact that predators have on prey density is unclear. A recent review suggests that predators have on average a small to moderate negative effect on prey density and that predatory invertebrates have a stronger impact than predatory vertebrates. We suggest that a reason for this difference between predatory invertebrates and vertebrates is differences in prey emigration responses to the two types of predators. If prey increase their emigration rates in the presence of predators, predator impacts on local prey density will be strong; conversely, if prey decrease their emigration rates in the presence of predators, prey density might actually build up in patches containing predators and predator impact on prey density will be weak or even positive. We reviewed 22 studies that examined the impact that predatory vertebrates and invertebrates have on prey drift and activity (crawling and rates of emergence from refuge). Our review revealed that predatory invertebrates cause prey to increase drift rates more often than expected by chance. Predatory vertebrates had variable effects on prey drift rates (sometimes increasing and sometimes decreasing prey drift rates), but they caused prey to decrease activity more often than expected by chance. These results provide a potential mechanism for the relatively large impact that predatory invertebrates have on prey density as compared to the impact that predatory vertebrates have. We suggest directions for future research that include examining the impact that both types of predators have on prey emigration behavior and benthic density in the same system.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:3 / 8
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Responses of a top and a meso predator and their prey to moon phases
    Vincenzo Penteriani
    Anna Kuparinen
    Maria del Mar Delgado
    Francisco Palomares
    José Vicente López-Bao
    José María Fedriani
    Javier Calzada
    Sacramento Moreno
    Rafael Villafuerte
    Letizia Campioni
    Rui Lourenço
    Oecologia, 2013, 173 : 753 - 766
  • [32] ESCAPE RESPONSES AND PREY AVAILABILITY IN A KELP FOREST PREDATOR-PREY SYSTEM
    HARROLD, C
    AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1982, 119 (01): : 132 - 135
  • [33] Functional responses: A question of alternative prey and predator density
    Tschanz, Britta
    Bersier, Louis-Felix
    Bacher, Sven
    ECOLOGY, 2007, 88 (05) : 1300 - 1308
  • [34] A review of predator–prey systems with dormancy of predators
    Tao Wen
    Qiuya Gao
    Tamás Kalmár-Nagy
    Yong Deng
    Kang Hao Cheong
    Nonlinear Dynamics, 2022, 107 : 3271 - 3289
  • [35] Dynamics of a predator–prey model with harvesting and reserve area for prey in the presence of competition and toxicity
    Younes Louartassi
    Abdellah Alla
    Khalid Hattaf
    Aissam Nabil
    Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing, 2019, 59 : 305 - 321
  • [36] Impact of Fear in a Delayed Predator–Prey System with Prey Refuge in Presence of Additional Food
    Sudeshna Mondal
    Samanta G.P.
    Biophysics, 2021, 66 (3) : 438 - 463
  • [37] Multiple predator effects on microdistributions, survival, and drift of stream hydropsychid caddisflies
    Fairchild, MP
    Holomuzki, JR
    JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN BENTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 24 (01): : 101 - 112
  • [38] Consequences for predator-prey dynamics caused by the presence of obstacles
    Scepanovic, J. R.
    Budinski-Petkovic, Lj
    Jaksic, Z. M.
    Belic, A.
    Vrhovac, S. B.
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS-THEORY AND EXPERIMENT, 2023, 2023 (08):
  • [39] Antipredator behaviour in a predator-prey system in presence of a competitor
    Maji, Chandan
    Mukherjee, Debasis
    SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE NEW TRENDS IN THE APPLICATIONS OF DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS IN SCIENCES (NTADES 2019), 2019, 2159
  • [40] Is prey predation risk influenced more by increasing predator density or predator species richness in stream enclosures?
    Heather D. Vance-Chalcraft
    Daniel A. Soluk
    Nicholas Ozburn
    Oecologia, 2004, 139 : 117 - 122