Primary shoulder replacement using stemless inlay arthroplasty as a joint preservation alternative

被引:1
|
作者
Davidson, Philip A. [1 ]
Rivenburgh, Dennis [2 ]
机构
[1] Cartilage Restorat & Joint Resurfacing, Davidson Orthoped, 6360 South 3000 East,Suite 200, Salt Lake City, UT 84121 USA
[2] Sandra & Malcolm Berman Brain & Spine Inst, Sports Neurol, Baltimore, MD USA
来源
CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE | 2018年 / 29卷 / 03期
关键词
stemless inlay arthroplasty; cartilage defect; shoulder arthroplasty; HemiCAP;
D O I
10.1097/BCO.0000000000000614
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Stemmed shoulder arthroplasties are being performed at increasing rates with loosening and revisions on the rise. Stemless inlay arthroplasty may be an effective alternative. Our purpose is to report 5-year results of primary joint-preserving stemless inlay arthroplasty. Methods: Twenty patients (22 shoulders), mean age 60.41 (range, 43-80) years followed for an average of 68.14 (range, 24-98) months were evaluated prospectively using the Constant, visual analog scale (VAS) pain, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), range of motion, Short-Form (SF)-36 Physical Component score (PCS), and Mental Component score (MCS), and radiographs. The Student t-test was used to compare mean differences from preoperative to postoperative with significance set at P< 0 05 a priori. Results: Significant improvements were demonstrated: Constant (39.4-82 .05, P<0.001), VAS pain today (6.2-3.2, P<0.001), VAS pain (activity) (7.7-3.4, P<0.001), VAS stability (5.3-1.7, P<0.001), SST (3.8-7.5, P< 0.001), external rotation (33.7-47.04, P= 0.04), and internal rotation (Constant: 5.3-7.1, P= 0.008) SF-36 MCS (48-06-51.5, P=0.34), SF-36 PCS (37.4-42.6, P= 0.065), VAS pain (rest) (3.5-2.7, P = 0.4), active (118.4-124.3, P= 0.63) and passive forward elevation (131.3-142.3, P=0.25) improved but not significantly. Follow-up radiographs showed no periprosthetic radiolucency, subsidence, or progression of disease. No revisions were attributed to failure of the implant. Conclusions: Stemless inlay arthroplasty is safe and effective, showing significant pain and functional improvements at an average of 5 yr. Inherent joint preservation lends itself well as a primary alternative for symptomatic glenohumeral degeneration.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 243
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture sequelae: How the initial fracture treatment influences the outcomes of joint replacement
    Santana, Fernando
    Alentorn-Geli, Eduard
    Guirro, Pau
    Torrens, Carlos
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2019, 53 (04) : 278 - 281
  • [32] Shoulder arthroplasty How far can we push anatomical joint replacement, what are the indications for reverse?
    Kircher, Joern
    ARTHROSKOPIE, 2020, 33 (05) : 370 - 377
  • [33] Medium-term results of stemless, short, and conventional stem humeral components in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a New Zealand Joint Registry study
    Zhou, Yushy
    Frampton, Chris
    Hirner, Marc
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2023, 32 (05) : 1001 - 1008
  • [34] Shoulder joint arthroplasty in young patients: Analysis of 8742 patients from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry
    Mcbride, Andrew Phillip
    Ross, Mark
    Duke, Phil
    Hoy, Greg
    Page, Richard
    Dyer, Chelsea
    Taylor, Fraser
    SHOULDER & ELBOW, 2023, 15 (1_SUPPL) : 41 - 52
  • [35] Stemless total shoulder arthroplasty using a novel multiplanar osteotomy and elliptical humeral head results in both improved early range of motion and radiographic center of rotation compared with standard total shoulder arthroplasty
    Budge, Matthew D.
    Orvets, Nathan
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2023, 32 (02) : 318 - 325
  • [36] Influence of age-related bone density changes on primary stability in stemless shoulder arthroplasty: a multi-implant finite element study
    Monteiro, Helena Libano
    Antunes, Madalena
    Sarmento, Marco
    Quental, Carlos
    Folgado, Joao
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2025, 34 (02) : 557 - 566
  • [37] Early effectiveness of shoulder arthroplasty for patients who have primary glenohumeral degenerative joint disease
    Matsen, FA
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1996, 78A (02): : 260 - 264
  • [38] Medium-term results of inlay vs. onlay humeral components for reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a New Zealand Joint Registry study
    Zhou, Yushy
    Mandaleson, Avanthi
    Frampton, Chris
    Hirner, Marc
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2024, 33 (01) : 99 - 107
  • [39] Mode of Fixation and Survivorship in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in the American Joint Replacement Registry
    Martin II, David P.
    Rossi, David M.
    Bukowski, Brett R.
    Sterling, Olivia N.
    Mullen, Kyle J.
    Hennessy, David W.
    Nickel, Brian T.
    Illgen II, Richard L.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 39 (08): : 2014 - 2021
  • [40] Survivorship of shoulder arthroplasty in young patients with osteoarthritis: an analysis of the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry
    Khoriati, Al-achraf
    Mcbride, Andrew P.
    Ross, Mark
    Duke, Phil
    Hoy, Greg
    Page, Richard
    Holder, Carl
    Taylor, Fraser
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2023, 32 (10) : 2105 - 2114