Primary shoulder replacement using stemless inlay arthroplasty as a joint preservation alternative

被引:1
|
作者
Davidson, Philip A. [1 ]
Rivenburgh, Dennis [2 ]
机构
[1] Cartilage Restorat & Joint Resurfacing, Davidson Orthoped, 6360 South 3000 East,Suite 200, Salt Lake City, UT 84121 USA
[2] Sandra & Malcolm Berman Brain & Spine Inst, Sports Neurol, Baltimore, MD USA
来源
CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE | 2018年 / 29卷 / 03期
关键词
stemless inlay arthroplasty; cartilage defect; shoulder arthroplasty; HemiCAP;
D O I
10.1097/BCO.0000000000000614
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Stemmed shoulder arthroplasties are being performed at increasing rates with loosening and revisions on the rise. Stemless inlay arthroplasty may be an effective alternative. Our purpose is to report 5-year results of primary joint-preserving stemless inlay arthroplasty. Methods: Twenty patients (22 shoulders), mean age 60.41 (range, 43-80) years followed for an average of 68.14 (range, 24-98) months were evaluated prospectively using the Constant, visual analog scale (VAS) pain, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), range of motion, Short-Form (SF)-36 Physical Component score (PCS), and Mental Component score (MCS), and radiographs. The Student t-test was used to compare mean differences from preoperative to postoperative with significance set at P< 0 05 a priori. Results: Significant improvements were demonstrated: Constant (39.4-82 .05, P<0.001), VAS pain today (6.2-3.2, P<0.001), VAS pain (activity) (7.7-3.4, P<0.001), VAS stability (5.3-1.7, P<0.001), SST (3.8-7.5, P< 0.001), external rotation (33.7-47.04, P= 0.04), and internal rotation (Constant: 5.3-7.1, P= 0.008) SF-36 MCS (48-06-51.5, P=0.34), SF-36 PCS (37.4-42.6, P= 0.065), VAS pain (rest) (3.5-2.7, P = 0.4), active (118.4-124.3, P= 0.63) and passive forward elevation (131.3-142.3, P=0.25) improved but not significantly. Follow-up radiographs showed no periprosthetic radiolucency, subsidence, or progression of disease. No revisions were attributed to failure of the implant. Conclusions: Stemless inlay arthroplasty is safe and effective, showing significant pain and functional improvements at an average of 5 yr. Inherent joint preservation lends itself well as a primary alternative for symptomatic glenohumeral degeneration.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 243
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Restoration of the joint geometry after stemless shoulder arthroplasty
    Chawla, Lokesh
    Kumar, Kapil
    Barker, Scott
    Ismail, Azzain
    SHOULDER & ELBOW, 2023, 15 (03) : 321 - 327
  • [2] Primary inlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty has a higher rate of revision than onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty: Analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry
    Gill, David R. J.
    Gill, Stephen D.
    Corfield, Sophia
    Holder, Carl
    Page, Richard S.
    SHOULDER & ELBOW, 2023, 15 (3_SUPPL) : 75 - 81
  • [3] Survival of stemless humeral head replacement in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective study
    Magosch, Petra
    Lichtenberg, Sven
    Habermeyer, Peter
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (07) : E343 - E355
  • [4] Stemless total shoulder arthroplasty in elderly patients with primary osteoarthritis of shoulder - a developing country experience
    Singh, Vishwajeet
    Desai, Sanjay S.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2021, 18 (04) : 407 - 411
  • [5] Determination of humeral inclination in stemless shoulder arthroplasty using plain radiographs
    Beck, Sascha
    Martin, Robert J.
    Patsalis, Theodor
    Burggraf, Manuel
    Busch, Andre
    Landgraeber, Stefan
    Alexander, Wegner
    ORTHOPEDIC REVIEWS, 2019, 11 (04) : 197 - 200
  • [6] Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using OVO®/OVO® Motion with Inlay Glenoid Shoulder Arthroplasty System
    Yalcin, Sercan
    Scarcella, Michael
    Miniaci, Anthony
    SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL-INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS IN SURGERY AND SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 38
  • [7] Shoulder instability after primary shoulder joint replacement
    Lohr, JF
    Floren, M
    Schwyzer, HK
    Simmen, BR
    Gschwend, N
    ORTHOPADE, 1998, 27 (08): : 571 - 575
  • [8] Two-year results of stemless total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis
    Westphal, Thomas
    Willert, Thomas
    Sahmidt, Tony
    Gehring, Josephine
    Weber, Joerg
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2020, 86 (S 1): : 173 - 179
  • [9] A comparison of revision rates for stemmed and stemless primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty with all-polyethylene glenoid components: analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry
    Gill, David R. J.
    Corfield, Sophia
    Harries, Dylan
    Page, Richard S.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2024, 33 (02) : 281 - 290
  • [10] Stemless anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients under 55 years of age with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: an analysis of the Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry at 5 years
    Jomaa, Mohammad
    Ingoe, Helen
    Hollman, Freek
    Pareyo, Roberto
    Whitehouse, Sarah L.
    Du, Peiyao
    Gill, David R. J.
    Maharaj, Jashint
    Gupta, Ashish
    Cutbush, Kenneth
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2025, 34 (04) : 1032 - 1042