Early sheath removal after percutaneous coronary intervention using Assiut Femoral Compression Device is feasible and safe. Results of a randomized controlled trial

被引:3
|
作者
Hassan, Ayman K. M. [1 ]
Hasan-Ali, Hosam [1 ]
Demetry, Salwa R. [1 ]
Refaat, Randa [1 ]
Ali, Ahmed S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Assiut Univ, Fac Med, Dept Cardiol, Assiut, Egypt
[2] Assiut Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Mechatron Div, Assiut, Egypt
来源
EGYPTIAN HEART JOURNAL | 2015年 / 67卷 / 01期
关键词
Femoral Compression Device; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Hemostasis; Vascular complications;
D O I
10.1016/j.ehj.2014.10.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: This study was performed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of early sheath removal after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using a locally designed Assiut Femoral Compression Device (AFCD2) vs. manual compression (MC). Background: Due to antithrombotic therapy before, during, and after PCI, the arterial femoral sheath is generally not removed early after PCI. Patients and methods: This was a randomized, controlled trial. We enrolled all patients undergoing PCI at Assiut University Hospitals from September, 2013 to December, 2013. At the end of PCI, the arterial hemostasis method was randomly assigned 1: 1 to AFCD2 vs. MC. The sheaths were removed 2 h after PCI, instead of conventional 6 h, in the AFCD2 arm. Results: The trial assigned 100 patients (mean age 57 +/- 9 years, 75% men) to AFCD2 (n = 50) vs. MC (n = 50). Both groups were comparable regarding baseline characteristics. Concerning the primary effectiveness end point, there was significantly shorter mean time-to-ambulation with AFCD2 (8.2 +/- 1.42 h) vs. MC (12.02 +/- 0.22 h; p = < 0.001). This was directly reflected on shorter time for hospital discharge eligibility in AFCD2 (11 +/- 1 h) vs. MC (15 +/- 1 h; p = < 0.001). As regards safety, none of our research population experienced major adverse events. The use of AFCD2 was associated with similar occurrence of minor complications, mainly ecchymosis and oozing, compared with MC. Conclusion: Our results indicate that AFCD2 is a simple and effective alternative to MC for hemostasis following PCI. Early sheath removal 2 h post PCI is feasible, safe, and improves the patient's comfort. (cC) 2014 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Egyptian Society of Cardiology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 77
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Immediate sheath removal after PCI using a Femostop® is feasible and safe.: Results of a registry
    Jaspers, L
    Benit, E
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2003, 58 (06) : 535 - 537
  • [2] A randomized controlled trial assessing the use of compression versus vasoconstriction in the treatment of femoral hematoma occurring after percutaneous coronary intervention
    King, Nicola A.
    Philpott, Samantha J.
    Leary, Alison
    HEART & LUNG, 2008, 37 (03): : 205 - 210
  • [3] Effects of Valsalva Maneuver on Pain and Vasovagal Reaction During the Removing of Femoral Arterial Sheath After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ghods, Ali Asghar
    Roshani, Akram
    Mirmohammadkhani, Majid
    Soleimani, Mohsen
    JOURNAL OF PERIANESTHESIA NURSING, 2022, 37 (06) : 900 - 906
  • [4] Ambulation after femoral sheath removal in percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective comparison of early vs. late ambulation
    Schiks, Ingrid E. J. M.
    Schoonhoven, Lisette
    Aengevaeren, Wim R. M.
    Nogarede-Hoekstra, Coby
    van Achterberg, Theo
    Verheugt, Freek W. A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2009, 18 (13) : 1862 - 1870
  • [5] Early sheath removal and ambulation in patients submitted to percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomised clinical trial
    Augustin, Andrea Cornelia
    de Quadros, Alexandre Schaan
    Sarmento-Leite, Rogerio E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2010, 47 (08) : 939 - 945
  • [6] Controlled comparison of early versus late ambulation after femoral sheath removal in coronary angioplasty
    Schiks, IE
    Nogarede-Hoekstra, J
    Aengevaeren, WRM
    Verheugt, FWA
    Van Achterberg, T
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 25 : 24 - 24
  • [7] The effect of reiki and acupressure on pain, anxiety and vital signs during femoral sheath removal in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomized controlled study
    Avci, Abdullah
    Gun, Meral
    EXPLORE-THE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND HEALING, 2024, 20 (06)
  • [8] Ambulation after femoral sheath removal in coronary angioplasty: A controlled comparison of early versus late ambulation
    Schiks, IE
    Nogarede-Hoekstra, C
    Aengevaeren, WR
    Verheugt, FW
    van Achterberg, T
    CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (17) : U762 - U762
  • [9] Early discharge of patients (within 24 h) after percutaneous coronary intervention is feasible and safe in Indian setup
    Showkathali, Refai
    Yalamanchi, Radhapriya
    Oomman, Abraham
    INDIAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 72 (02) : 126 - 127
  • [10] Differences of bleedings after percutaneous coronary intervention using femoral closure and radial compression devices
    Kim, Seung-Hyun
    Behnes, Michael
    Baron, Sebastian
    Shchetynska-Marinova, Tetyana
    Tekinsoy, Melike
    Mashayekhi, Kambis
    Hoffmann, Ursula
    Borggrefe, Martin
    Akin, Ibrahim
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (20)