Ambulation after femoral sheath removal in percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective comparison of early vs. late ambulation

被引:12
|
作者
Schiks, Ingrid E. J. M. [2 ]
Schoonhoven, Lisette [1 ]
Aengevaeren, Wim R. M. [2 ]
Nogarede-Hoekstra, Coby [1 ]
van Achterberg, Theo
Verheugt, Freek W. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Ctr Qual Care Res, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Heart Lung Ctr, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
clinical trial; comfort; coronary heart disease; evidence-based practice; hospital care; nursing care; LOW-DOSE HEPARIN; VASCULAR COMPLICATIONS; HEMOSTASIS TECHNIQUES; GUIDING CATHETERS; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; ANGIOPLASTY; ANGIOGRAPHY; REGISTRY; COMFORT; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02587.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
To investigate if ambulation four hours after sheath removal can replace ambulation 10 hours or more after sheath removal with regard to puncture site complications after percutaneous coronary interventions and to examine patient comfort in both groups. Early ambulation after percutaneous coronary intervention may facilitate earlier hospital discharge. Whether this approach is safe, is unknown. A non-randomised comparative study. Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed by femoral approach. Registered nurses of the ward removed the sheath and haemostasis was achieved by manual compression. After bed rest with a compression bandage for four hours, the patients in the early ambulation group were ambulated. The patients in the control group stayed in bed till the next morning. Primary study endpoint was the composition of puncture site complications: haematoma, bleeding, false aneurysm and arteriovenous fistula. Secondary endpoints were occurrence of vasovagal collapse after mobilisation, back pain and problems with voiding. In the early ambulation group (n = 329) the total number of complications was nine (2.7%), vs. six (3.0%) in the control group (n = 202). The complication rate in the early ambulation group is not increased compared to the control group (test for non-inferiority p = 0.002). Hence non-inferiority is accepted and practical equivalence shown. There were no statistically significant differences concerning patient comfort between the groups. Early ambulation four hours after femoral sheath removal is feasible and safe. The incidence of puncture site complications in the early ambulation group is not increased in comparison with the group with prolonged bed rest. Patients could possibly be discharged earlier after percutaneous coronary intervention, allowing percutaneous coronary intervention in an ambulant setting. Further research should confirm these findings and extend the research to the effect of various closure devices in early ambulation and on patients' well-being.
引用
收藏
页码:1862 / 1870
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ambulation after femoral sheath removal in coronary angioplasty: A controlled comparison of early versus late ambulation
    Schiks, IE
    Nogarede-Hoekstra, C
    Aengevaeren, WR
    Verheugt, FW
    van Achterberg, T
    CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (17) : U762 - U762
  • [2] Controlled comparison of early versus late ambulation after femoral sheath removal in coronary angioplasty
    Schiks, IE
    Nogarede-Hoekstra, J
    Aengevaeren, WRM
    Verheugt, FWA
    Van Achterberg, T
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 25 : 24 - 24
  • [3] The effect of early vs. late ambulation on femoral vascular complication and patients' discomfort after percutaneous coronary intervention
    Chuang, Y. C.
    Dai, Y. Z.
    Kao, H. L.
    Lou, M. F.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 : 950 - 950
  • [4] Early sheath removal and ambulation in patients submitted to percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomised clinical trial
    Augustin, Andrea Cornelia
    de Quadros, Alexandre Schaan
    Sarmento-Leite, Rogerio E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2010, 47 (08) : 939 - 945
  • [5] Early ambulation after percutaneous coronary interventions
    Boztosun, Bilal
    Gunes, Yilmaz
    Olcay, Ayhan
    Yildiz, Ahmet
    Saglam, Mustafa
    Bulut, Mustafa
    Kargin, Ramazan
    TURK KARDIYOLOJI DERNEGI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 35 (04): : 227 - 230
  • [6] Percutaneous coronary intervention with bivalirudin anticoagulation, immediate sheath removal, and early ambulation: A feasibility study with implications for day-stay procedures
    Ormiston, JA
    Shaw, BL
    Panther, MJ
    Ruygrok, PN
    Devlin, GP
    Stewart, RAH
    Webster, MWI
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2002, 55 (03) : 289 - 293
  • [7] Meta-analysis of complication as a risk factor for early ambulation after percutaneous coronary intervention
    Kim, Kyunghee
    Won, Sungho
    Kim, Jisu
    Lee, Eunkyung
    Kim, Kisook
    Park, Suyeon
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2013, 12 (05) : 429 - 436
  • [8] Femoral Vascular Closure Devices and Bleeding, Hemostasis, and Ambulation Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Marquis-Gravel, Guillaume
    Boivin-Proulx, Laurie-Anne
    Huang, Zhen
    Zelenkofske, Steven L.
    Lincoff, A. Michael
    Mehran, Roxana
    Steg, P. Gabriel
    Bode, Christoph
    Alexander, John H.
    Povsic, Thomas J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2023, 12 (01):
  • [9] FEMORAL VASCULAR CLOSURE DEVICES AND BLEEDING, HEMOSTASIS, AND AMBULATION FOLLOWING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION
    Proulx, Laurie-Anne Boivin
    Marquis-Gravel, Guillaume
    Huang, Zhen
    Zelenkofske, Steven L.
    Lincoff, A. Michael
    Mehran, Roxana
    Steg, Philippe Gabriel
    Bode, Christoph
    Alexander, John H.
    Povsic, Thomas Joseph
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 79 (09) : 831 - 831
  • [10] The Angio-Seal™ femoral closure device allows immediate ambulation after coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention
    Hvelplund, Anders
    Jeger, Raban
    Osterwalder, Remo
    Bredahl, Majken
    Madsen, Jan Kyst
    Jensen, Jan Skov
    Kaiser, Christoph
    Pfisterer, Matthias
    Galatius, Soren
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2011, 7 (02) : 234 - 241