Board review course effect on resident in-training examination

被引:0
|
作者
Cheng, David [1 ]
机构
[1] UH Emergency Dept, 470 Schooleys Mt Rd, Hackettstown, NJ 07840 USA
关键词
In-training examination; Board review; Emergency medicine resident;
D O I
10.1007/s12245-008-0068-5
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background The in-training examination is a national and yearly exam administered by the American Board of Emergency Medicine to all emergency medicine residents in the USA. The purpose of the examination is to evaluate a resident's progress toward obtaining the fundamental knowledge to practice independent emergency medicine. Aims The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of a 40 hour board review lecture course on the resident intraining examination in emergency medicine. Methods A 40 hour board review lecture course was designed and implemented during the weekly 5 hour long resident conferences during the 8 weeks preceding the intraining examination date in 2006. Attendance was mandatory at the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) standard of 70% or greater. A positive result was considered to be a 10% increase or greater in the resident's individual national class percentile ranking among their national peers for their class year for the emergency medicine in-training examination. A resident was excluded from the study if there was no 2005 intraining examination score for self-comparison. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to analyze the results. Results Of 16 residents, 1 (6.25%; 95% CI: 0-18%) showed a positive result of increasing their national class percentile ranking by 10% or greater. For the PGY2, one of the eight had a positive result (12.5%; 95% CI: 0-35.4%). For PGY3, no resident (0%; 95% CI: 0-35.4%) had a positive result. Conclusions A 40 hour board review lecture course has no positive effect on improving a resident's in-training examination score.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 329
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Assessing the predictive value of the American Board of Family Practice In-training Examination
    Replogle, WH
    Johnson, WD
    FAMILY MEDICINE, 2004, 36 (03) : 185 - 188
  • [43] Performance of ChatGPT on American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination Preparation Questions
    Tran, Catherine G.
    Chang, Jeremy
    Sherman, Scott K.
    De Andrade, James P.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 299 : 329 - 335
  • [44] A multimodal approach improves American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination scores
    Decoteau, Mary A.
    Rivera, Louis
    Umali, Kristina
    Chan, Arden D.
    Soballe, Peter
    Ignacio, Romeo C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 215 (02): : 315 - 321
  • [45] Update on the in-training examination
    Rovinelli, Richard
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2007, 5 (06) : 564 - 564
  • [46] Improving American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination Scores Motivation Matters
    Deveney, Karen
    JAMA SURGERY, 2015, 150 (09) : 889 - 889
  • [47] IN-TRAINING EXAMINATION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY
    LIERLE, DM
    EYE EAR NOSE AND THROAT MONTHLY, 1970, 49 (06): : 267 - &
  • [48] Immersion Education for Orthopaedic Pathology: A Review of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination and American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Certification
    Papp, Derek F.
    Johnston, James C.
    Carrino, John A.
    McCarthy, Edward F.
    Frassica, Frank J.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2010, 92A : 152 - 160
  • [49] Impact of the resident duty hours on in-training examination score: A nationwide study in Japan
    Nagasaki, Kazuya
    Nishizaki, Yuji
    Shinozaki, Tomohiro
    Kobayashi, Hiroyuki
    Shimizu, Taro
    Okubo, Tomoya
    Yamamoto, Yu
    Konishi, Ryota
    Tokuda, Yasuharu
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2022, 44 (04) : 433 - 440
  • [50] Assessment of resident knowledge: Subjective assessment versus performance on the ACR in-training examination
    Wise, S
    Stagg, PL
    Szucs, R
    Gay, S
    Mauger, D
    Hartman, D
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1999, 6 (01) : 66 - 71