Assessment of student preferences for small versus large group discussions and access to learning materials

被引:0
|
作者
Crawford, Tonya
Robles, Atenea [1 ]
Booth, Benjamin [2 ]
Popovich, Nicholas G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Coll Pharm, Sch Publ Hlth, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol & Biostat, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Adm, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
Group discussions; Learning materials; Student feedback;
D O I
10.1016/j.cptl.2012.09.015
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Objective: Assess pharmacy student's perceptions of small group (n = 10) versus large group discussion during recitation (n = > 80) and perceived learning benefits based on access to patient cases. Methods: Respondents selected responses on a 5-point Likert scale regarding their access to patient cases prior to recitation. Respondents ranked their preference for small versus large group discussion based on the setting in which patient cases were reviewed. Respondents were able to express their thoughts in writing for five items. Results: One-hundred seventeen second professional year Doctor of Pharmacy students participated. Small group discussions in separate rooms and reviewing patient cases as a group in the separate room was least preferred by respondents regardless of if they received patients cases prior to (p<0.001) or during recitation (p<0.001). Most respondents preferred a large group discussion in an auditorium and reviewing patient cases as a whole class if provided patient cases prior to recitation (p = 0.0094). Respondents favored small group discussions in an auditorium and reviewing patient cases as a whole class if they received patient cases during recitation (p <0.001). Conclusions: Preference for small or large group recitation discussions was dependent on when respondents received patient cases. Faculty may coordinate the group setting in recitation based on pharmacy students' access to course material. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 109
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The aesthetic value of river flows: An assessment of flow preferences for large and small rivers
    Pfluger, Yvonne
    Rackham, Allan
    Larned, Scott
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2010, 95 (1-2) : 68 - 78
  • [42] VERBAL COMMENTS, IDEAS, FEEDBACK, AND SELF-ASSESSMENT DURING SMALL-GROUP DISCUSSIONS
    HANSFORD, BC
    DIEHL, BJ
    SMALL GROUP BEHAVIOR, 1988, 19 (04): : 485 - 494
  • [43] Small-group learning in undergraduate STEM disciplines: effect of group type on student achievement
    Micari, Marina
    Pazos, Pilar
    Streitwieser, Bernhard
    Light, Gregory
    EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND EVALUATION, 2010, 16 (03) : 269 - 286
  • [44] Genetic associations in large versus small studies: an empirical assessment
    Ioannidis, JPA
    Trikalinos, TA
    Ntzani, EE
    Contopoulos-Ioannidis, DG
    LANCET, 2003, 361 (9357): : 567 - 571
  • [45] Undergraduate students’ preferences for constructed versus multiple-choice assessment of learning
    Mingo M.A.
    Chang H.-H.
    Williams R.L.
    Innovative Higher Education, 2018, 43 (2) : 143 - 152
  • [46] Large body and small brain and group sizes are associated with predator preferences for mammalian prey
    Shultz, Susanne
    Finlayson, Laura V.
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2010, 21 (05) : 1073 - 1079
  • [47] Learning to listen and listening to learn: one student’s experience of small group collaborative learning
    Louisa Remedios
    David Clarke
    Lesleyanne Hawthorne
    The Australian Educational Researcher, 2012, 39 : 333 - 348
  • [48] Learning to listen and listening to learn: one student's experience of small group collaborative learning
    Remedios, Louisa
    Clarke, David
    Hawthorne, Lesleyanne
    AUSTRALIAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2012, 39 (03): : 333 - 348
  • [49] Priority of access and grooming patterns of females in a large and a small group of olive baboons
    Sambrook, TD
    Whiten, A
    Strum, SC
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1995, 50 : 1667 - 1682
  • [50] FACILITATING SMALL-GROUP LEARNING - A COMPARISON OF STUDENT AND STAFF TUTORS BEHAVIOR
    MOUST, JHC
    SCHMIDT, HG
    INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 1994, 22 (04) : 287 - 301