IMMUNOREACTIVE P53 PROTEIN IN HIGH-GRADE PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA

被引:13
|
作者
HUMPHREY, PA
SWANSON, PE
机构
[1] Lauren V. Ackerman Laboratory of Surgical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri
关键词
P53; PROSTATE CANCER; INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA;
D O I
10.1016/S0344-0338(11)80972-6
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
p53 protein accumulation in the nuclei of prostatic carcinoma cells, as detected by immunohistochemistry, has been associated with increased cell proliferation rate, increased histologic grade and stage, androgen independence and decreased patient survival. Little is known, however, of p53 in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), the putative precursor proliferation for moderately to poorly differentiated peripheral zone carcinoma of the prostate. In this investigation, we utilized a panel of antibodies reactive with p53 protein to assess p53 protein accumulation in prostatic epithelial hyperplasia, PIN and prostatic carcinoma. Forty patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy were selected for study based on the presence of high grade PIN and carcinoma in the same prostate tissue block. Tissue sections were treated with microwave irradiation for antigen retrieval, and antibodies DO-7, PAb1801 and CM-1 were used for immunohistochemical analysis. An intense signal for immunoreactive p53 was identified in the nuclei of 7/40 (17.5%) clinically-localized prostatic carcinomas. In all 7 cases, high grade PIN also exhibited intense p53 immunoreactivity, whereas only one case of hyperplasia contained immunoreactive p53 protein. These findings support a close relationship between high grade PIN and carcinoma in a subset of primary prostatic carcinomas with high-level p53 protein accumulation.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 887
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Molecular Pathology of High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Challenges and Opportunities
    Trabzonlu, Levent
    Kulac, Ibrahim
    Zheng, Qizhi
    Hicks, Jessica L.
    Haffner, Michael C.
    Nelson, William G.
    Sfanos, Karen S.
    Ertunc, Onur
    Lotan, Tamara L.
    Heaphy, Christopher M.
    Meeker, Alan K.
    Yegnasubramanian, Srinivasan
    De Marzo, Angelo M.
    COLD SPRING HARBOR PERSPECTIVES IN MEDICINE, 2019, 9 (04):
  • [32] SIGNIFICANCE OF HIGH-GRADE PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA ON NEEDLE-BIOPSY
    WEINSTEIN, MH
    EPSTEIN, JI
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1993, 24 (06) : 624 - 629
  • [33] Contemporary clinical management of isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
    G Godoy
    S S Taneja
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2008, 11 : 20 - 31
  • [34] High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer risk reduction
    Steiner, MS
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 21 (01) : 15 - 20
  • [35] Contemporary clinical management of isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
    Godoy, G.
    Taneja, S. S.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2008, 11 (01) : 20 - 31
  • [36] Utility of ERG in prostate cancer and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
    Allina, D.
    Andreeva, Y.
    Zavalishina, L.
    Moskvina, L.
    Frank, G.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2015, 467 : S20 - S20
  • [37] Histological markers of risk and the role of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
    Sakr, WA
    Partin, AW
    UROLOGY, 2001, 57 (4A) : 115 - 120
  • [38] The extent and multicentricity of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in clinically localized prostatic adenocarcinoma
    Qian, JQ
    Wollan, P
    Bostwick, DG
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1997, 28 (02) : 143 - 148
  • [39] Decreased annexin I expression in prostatic adenocarcinoma and in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
    Patton, KT
    Chen, HM
    Joseph, L
    Yang, XJ
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2005, 47 (06) : 597 - 601
  • [40] Dysregulation of annexin I protein expression in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer
    Kang, JS
    Calvo, BF
    Maygarden, SJ
    Caskey, LS
    Mohler, JL
    Ornstein, DK
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2002, 8 (01) : 117 - 123