A subjective refraction-based assessment of image quality metrics

被引:9
|
作者
Iskander, D. Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Univ Technol, Inst Biomed Engn & Instrumentat, Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27, PL-50370 Wroclaw, Poland
关键词
D O I
10.4302/plp.2011.4.08
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Tools for quantifying image quality should be bench-marked against subjective human assessment. It is expected that image quality metrics (IQMs) that are based on a human visual system should closely correlate with an observer's perception of vision quality. Performances of a range of popular IQMs were evaluated using subjective and objective measures of optimal refraction from 120 eyes. An optimization algorithm was devised in which objective refraction corresponding to the peak of a given IQM was sought. That optimized objective refraction was then correlated with the corresponding subjective refraction. The results show that although most IQMs result in a similar performance for defocus, those which only use the second order statistical information do not correlate well with a subjective assessment of image quality.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 152
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Subjective image quality assessment at the threshold level
    White, C.
    Martin, R.
    Wu, D.
    Tan, C. S.
    Tan, D. M.
    Wu, H. R.
    Cai, J.
    [J]. TENCON 2005 - 2005 IEEE REGION 10 CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-5, 2006, : 785 - +
  • [32] Multiple Image Arrangement for Subjective Quality Assessment
    Wang Y.
    Zhai G.
    [J]. Wang, Yan (yanwang@sjtu.edu.cn), 2017, Springer Science and Business Media, LLC (18):
  • [33] Active Sampling for Subjective Image Quality Assessment
    Ye, Peng
    Doermann, David
    [J]. 2014 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2014, : 4249 - 4256
  • [34] Image quality metrics based on scale
    Namuduri, KR
    Murenzi, R
    Kaplan, LM
    Johnson, D
    [J]. WAVELET APPLICATIONS V, 1998, 3391 : 245 - 254
  • [35] Steganalysis based on image quality metrics
    Avcibas, I
    Memon, N
    Sankur, B
    [J]. 2001 IEEE FOURTH WORKSHOP ON MULTIMEDIA SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2001, : 517 - 522
  • [36] Quantifying image quality in graphics: Perspective on subjective and objective metrics and their performance
    Mantiuk, Rafal K.
    [J]. HUMAN VISION AND ELECTRONIC IMAGING XVIII, 2013, 8651
  • [37] Benchmarking of objective quality metrics for HDR image quality assessment
    Hanhart, Philippe
    Bernardo, Marco V.
    Pereira, Manuela
    Pinheiro, Antonio M. G.
    Ebrahimi, Touradj
    [J]. EURASIP JOURNAL ON IMAGE AND VIDEO PROCESSING, 2015, : 1 - 18
  • [38] Subjective video quality metrics based on failure statistics
    Suresh, N
    Jayant, N
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD IASTED INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CIRCUITS, SIGNALS, AND SYSTEMS, 2005, : 200 - 205
  • [39] Benchmarking of objective quality metrics for HDR image quality assessment
    Philippe Hanhart
    Marco V. Bernardo
    Manuela Pereira
    António M. G. Pinheiro
    Touradj Ebrahimi
    [J]. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, 2015
  • [40] Predicting subjective judgment of best focus with objective image quality metrics
    Cheng, X
    Bradley, A
    Thibos, LN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISION, 2004, 4 (04): : 310 - 321