Autopilot? A reflexive review of the piloting process in qualitative e-research

被引:18
|
作者
Pritchard, Katrina [1 ]
Whiting, Rebecca [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London, Dept Org Psychol, London, England
关键词
Pilot; E-research; Reflexivity; Age; Research methods; Research work;
D O I
10.1108/17465641211279798
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine an oft-neglected aspect of qualitative research practice - conducting a pilot - using the innovative approach of "e-research" to generate both practical and methodological insights. Design/methodology/approach - Using the authors' "e-research" pilot as a reflexive case study, key methodological issues are critically reviewed. This review is set in a broader context of the qualitative methods literature in which piloting appears largely as an implicit practice. Using a new and emerging approach ("e-research") provides a prompt to review "autopilot" tendencies and offers a new lens for analysing research practice. Findings - The authors find that despite an initial focus on "practical" aspects of data collection within their "e-research", the pilot opened up a range of areas for further consideration. The authors review research ethics, collaborative research practices and data management issues specifically for e-research but also reflect more broadly on potential implications for piloting within other research designs. Practical implications - The authors aim to offer both practical and methodological insights for qualitative researchers, whatever their methodological orientation, so that they might develop approaches for piloting that are appropriate to their own research endeavours. More specifically, the authors offer tentative guidance to those venturing into the emerging area of "e-research". Originality/value - This paper offers insight into an oft-ignored aspect of qualitative research, whilst also engaging in an emerging area of methodological interest.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 353
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Crowdsourced science: sociotechnical epistemology in the e-research paradigm
    Watson, David
    Floridi, Luciano
    SYNTHESE, 2018, 195 (02) : 741 - 764
  • [32] Qualitative research and reflexive faculty change potentials
    Payne, SL
    JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT, 1996, 9 (02) : 20 - &
  • [34] Reflexive methodology: new vistas for qualitative research
    Pedler, Mike
    ACTION LEARNING, 2012, 9 (01): : 83 - 87
  • [35] How to ... be reflexive when conducting qualitative research
    Barrett, Aileen
    Kajamaa, Anu
    Johnston, Jenny
    CLINICAL TEACHER, 2020, 17 (01): : 9 - 12
  • [37] Changing of library services under e-research environment
    Zhao, Yajie
    ELECTRONIC LIBRARY, 2009, 27 (02): : 342 - 348
  • [38] Using the Sakai collaborative toolkit in e-research applications
    Severance, Charles
    Hardin, Joseph
    Golden, Glenn
    Crouchley, Robert
    Fish, Adrian
    Finholt, Tom
    Kirschner, Beth
    Eng, Jim
    Allan, Rob
    CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2007, 19 (12): : 1643 - 1652
  • [39] USABILITY of Collaborative Web Surfing Systems in e-Research
    Jalbani, A.A., 1600, International Journal of Computer Science Issues (IJCSI) (09): : 1 - 3
  • [40] Reflexive methodology, new vistas for qualitative research
    Benschop, Y
    ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2002, 23 (05) : 845 - 847