Autopilot? A reflexive review of the piloting process in qualitative e-research

被引:18
|
作者
Pritchard, Katrina [1 ]
Whiting, Rebecca [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London, Dept Org Psychol, London, England
关键词
Pilot; E-research; Reflexivity; Age; Research methods; Research work;
D O I
10.1108/17465641211279798
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine an oft-neglected aspect of qualitative research practice - conducting a pilot - using the innovative approach of "e-research" to generate both practical and methodological insights. Design/methodology/approach - Using the authors' "e-research" pilot as a reflexive case study, key methodological issues are critically reviewed. This review is set in a broader context of the qualitative methods literature in which piloting appears largely as an implicit practice. Using a new and emerging approach ("e-research") provides a prompt to review "autopilot" tendencies and offers a new lens for analysing research practice. Findings - The authors find that despite an initial focus on "practical" aspects of data collection within their "e-research", the pilot opened up a range of areas for further consideration. The authors review research ethics, collaborative research practices and data management issues specifically for e-research but also reflect more broadly on potential implications for piloting within other research designs. Practical implications - The authors aim to offer both practical and methodological insights for qualitative researchers, whatever their methodological orientation, so that they might develop approaches for piloting that are appropriate to their own research endeavours. More specifically, the authors offer tentative guidance to those venturing into the emerging area of "e-research". Originality/value - This paper offers insight into an oft-ignored aspect of qualitative research, whilst also engaging in an emerging area of methodological interest.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 353
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The e-Research Lab
    Helfricb, John P.
    Scientific Computing and Instrumentation, 2003, 20 (12):
  • [2] Grid Interoperability for e-Research
    Riedel, Morris
    Terstyanszky, Gabor
    JOURNAL OF GRID COMPUTING, 2009, 7 (03) : 285 - 286
  • [3] Qualitative research as reflexive process: a word limitation challenge in qualitative medical research publications?
    Del Busso, Lilliana
    Leonardsen, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist
    NORDISK SYGEPLEJEFORSKNING-NORDIC NURSING RESEARCH, 2019, 9 (03): : 182 - 187
  • [4] Grid Interoperability for e-Research
    Morris Riedel
    Gabor Terstyanszky
    Journal of Grid Computing, 2009, 7 : 285 - 286
  • [5] Special collection: e-research
    Appelbe, Bill
    Bannon, David
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 39 (02): : 81 - 82
  • [6] Defining e-research in social work: a review of strategies and challenges
    Albuquerque-Pai, Asha
    Dsouza, Melanie Pius
    Jothikaran, Teddy Andrews Jaihind
    Sebastin, K. V.
    Ashok, Lena
    CHINA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2023, 16 (02) : 137 - 165
  • [7] E-Research Collaboration in Academia and Industry
    Arinze, Bay
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF E-COLLABORATION, 2012, 8 (02) : 1 - 13
  • [8] E-democracy, e-commerce, and e-research
    Thomas, JC
    Streib, G
    ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 2005, 37 (03) : 259 - 280
  • [9] Special issue: Collaboration in e-Research
    Jirotka M.
    Procter R.
    Rodden T.
    Bowker G.C.
    Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 2006, 15 (4): : 251 - 255
  • [10] Research methods for eliciting e-research user requirements
    Urmetzer, Florian
    Baker, Mark
    Alexandrov, Vassil
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE UK E-SCIENCE ALL HANDS MEETING 2006, 2006, : 436 - +