CORRELATION AND VALIDATION OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS TO THE DRAIZE EYE IRRITATION TEST (OPAL PROJECT)

被引:20
|
作者
BLEIN, O
ADOLPHE, M
LAKHDAR, B
CAMBAR, J
GUBANSKI, G
CASTELLI, D
CONTIE, C
HUBERT, F
LATRILLE, F
MASSON, P
CLOUZEAU, J
LEBIGOT, JF
DESILVA, O
DOSSOU, KG
机构
[1] FAC PHARM BORDEAUX,ETUDE PHYSIOL & PHYSIOPATHOL GRP,F-33000 BORDEAUX,FRANCE
[2] LAB ROC,F-92700 COLOMBES,FRANCE
[3] CTR RECH BIOL,F-18800 BAUGY,FRANCE
[4] CEBA,EVIC,F-33295 BLANQUEFORT,FRANCE
[5] CTR INT TOXICOL,F-27005 EVREUX,FRANCE
[6] LOREAL,RECH FONDAMENTALE LABS,F-93601 AULNAY SOUS BOIS,FRANCE
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0887-2333(91)90092-R
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
A multicentre study of alternative methods to the Draize eye irritation test, involving six different laboratories was organized by OPAL (Oeuvre Pour l'Assistance aux Animaux de Laboratoire). Forty chemicals (including solvents, surfactants, acids, bases, and others) were selected for testing by three methods, namely Griffith's test (a low-volume eye irritation test on rabbits), the hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM) assay for the evaluation of hyperaemia, haemorrhage and coagulation, and neutral red uptake by SIRC cells for the assessment of cytotoxicity. Each method was used in two or three laboratories. Intralaboratory reproducibility was good for each laboratory with values, for error, close to 10%. Interlaboratory agreement was also good, particularly for the cell culture method, a quantitative and objective technique. Griffith's test correlated well with the Draize test (r = 0.846; n = 37), while for the HET-CAM test (r = 0.670; n = 32) and the cell culture method (r = 0.579; n = 32) the correlation was satisfactory. A more complete statistical analysis is currently under way to confirm and extend these preliminary findings.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 557
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Alternatives to the Draize eye test: Current status of validation and acceptance in Europe
    Spielmann, H
    [J]. ALTEX-ALTERNATIVEN ZU TIEREXPERIMENTEN, 1999, 16 (03): : 171 - 172
  • [42] Alternative methods for eye and skin irritation tests: An overview
    Vinardell, M. P.
    Mitjans, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 97 (01) : 46 - 59
  • [43] Draize rabbit eye test compatibility with eye irritation thresholds in humans:: A quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis
    Abraham, MH
    Hassanisadi, M
    Jalali-Heravi, M
    Ghafourian, T
    Cain, WS
    Cometto-Muñiz, JE
    [J]. TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 76 (02) : 384 - 391
  • [44] Human hemoglobin denaturation as an alternative to the Draize test for predicting eye irritancy of surfactants
    Mitjans, Montserrat
    Infante, M. Rosa
    Vinardell, M. Pilar
    [J]. REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 52 (02) : 89 - 93
  • [45] Draize test for eye irritation: Importance of the endpoints evaluated with regard to UN GHS/EU CLP classification
    Adriaens, Els
    Barroso, Joao
    Eskes, Chantra
    Hoffmann, Sebastian
    McNamee, Pauline
    Nathalie, Alepee
    Bessou-Touya, Sandrine
    De Smedt, Ann
    de Wever, Bart
    Pfannenbecker, Uwe
    Tailhardat, Magalie
    Kirmizidis, George
    Zuang, Valerie
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2013, 221 : S206 - S206
  • [46] TOXICITY OF COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS ON CELLS IN SUSPENSION-CULTURE - A POSSIBLE SCREEN FOR THE DRAIZE EYE IRRITATION TEST
    KEMP, RB
    MEREDITH, RWJ
    GAMBLE, SH
    [J]. FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1985, 23 (02) : 267 - 270
  • [47] Cosmetics Europe compilation of historical serious eye damage/eye irritation in vivo data analysed by drivers of classification to support the selection of chemicals for development and evaluation of alternative methods/strategies: the Draize eye test Reference Database (DRD)
    João Barroso
    Uwe Pfannenbecker
    Els Adriaens
    Nathalie Alépée
    Magalie Cluzel
    Ann De Smedt
    Jalila Hibatallah
    Martina Klaric
    Karsten R. Mewes
    Marion Millet
    Marie Templier
    Pauline McNamee
    [J]. Archives of Toxicology, 2017, 91 : 521 - 547
  • [48] Retrospective analysis of the Draize test for serious eye damage/eye irritation: importance of understanding the in vivo endpoints under UN GHS/EU CLP for the development and evaluation of in vitro test methods
    Els Adriaens
    João Barroso
    Chantra Eskes
    Sebastian Hoffmann
    Pauline McNamee
    Nathalie Alépée
    Sandrine Bessou-Touya
    Ann De Smedt
    Bart De Wever
    Uwe Pfannenbecker
    Magalie Tailhardat
    Valérie Zuang
    [J]. Archives of Toxicology, 2014, 88 : 701 - 723
  • [49] Results of a validation study in Germany on two in vitro alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test, the HET-CAM test and the 3T3 NRU cytotoxicity test
    Spielmann, H
    Liebsch, M
    Kalweit, S
    Moldenhauer, F
    Wirnsberger, T
    Holzhutter, HG
    Schneider, B
    Glaser, S
    Gerner, I
    Pape, WJW
    Kreiling, R
    Krauser, K
    Miltenburger, HG
    Steiling, W
    Luepke, NP
    Muller, N
    Kreuzer, H
    Murmann, P
    Spengler, J
    BertramNeis, E
    Siegemund, B
    Wiebel, FJ
    [J]. ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 1996, 24 (05): : 741 - 858
  • [50] Cosmetics Europe compilation of historical serious eye damage/eye irritation in vivo data analysed by drivers of classification to support the selection of chemicals for development and evaluation of alternative methods/strategies: the Draize eye test Reference Database (DRD)
    Barroso, Joao
    Pfannenbecker, Uwe
    Adriaens, Els
    Alepee, Nathalie
    Cluzel, Magalie
    De Smedt, Ann
    Hibatallah, Jalila
    Klaric, Martina
    Mewes, Karsten R.
    Millet, Marion
    Templier, Marie
    McNamee, Pauline
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 2017, 91 (02) : 521 - 547