CORRELATION AND VALIDATION OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS TO THE DRAIZE EYE IRRITATION TEST (OPAL PROJECT)

被引:20
|
作者
BLEIN, O
ADOLPHE, M
LAKHDAR, B
CAMBAR, J
GUBANSKI, G
CASTELLI, D
CONTIE, C
HUBERT, F
LATRILLE, F
MASSON, P
CLOUZEAU, J
LEBIGOT, JF
DESILVA, O
DOSSOU, KG
机构
[1] FAC PHARM BORDEAUX,ETUDE PHYSIOL & PHYSIOPATHOL GRP,F-33000 BORDEAUX,FRANCE
[2] LAB ROC,F-92700 COLOMBES,FRANCE
[3] CTR RECH BIOL,F-18800 BAUGY,FRANCE
[4] CEBA,EVIC,F-33295 BLANQUEFORT,FRANCE
[5] CTR INT TOXICOL,F-27005 EVREUX,FRANCE
[6] LOREAL,RECH FONDAMENTALE LABS,F-93601 AULNAY SOUS BOIS,FRANCE
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0887-2333(91)90092-R
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
A multicentre study of alternative methods to the Draize eye irritation test, involving six different laboratories was organized by OPAL (Oeuvre Pour l'Assistance aux Animaux de Laboratoire). Forty chemicals (including solvents, surfactants, acids, bases, and others) were selected for testing by three methods, namely Griffith's test (a low-volume eye irritation test on rabbits), the hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM) assay for the evaluation of hyperaemia, haemorrhage and coagulation, and neutral red uptake by SIRC cells for the assessment of cytotoxicity. Each method was used in two or three laboratories. Intralaboratory reproducibility was good for each laboratory with values, for error, close to 10%. Interlaboratory agreement was also good, particularly for the cell culture method, a quantitative and objective technique. Griffith's test correlated well with the Draize test (r = 0.846; n = 37), while for the HET-CAM test (r = 0.670; n = 32) and the cell culture method (r = 0.579; n = 32) the correlation was satisfactory. A more complete statistical analysis is currently under way to confirm and extend these preliminary findings.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 557
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A NATIONAL VALIDATION PROJECT OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS TO THE DRAIZE RABBIT EYE TEST
    KALWEIT, S
    BESOKE, R
    GERNER, I
    SPIELMANN, H
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 1990, 4 (4-5) : 702 - 706
  • [2] Development of a spectrophotometric method as alternative to draize eye irritation test
    Lagarto, A
    Vega, R
    Silva, R
    Guerra, I
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY, 2001, 164 (1-3) : 230 - 230
  • [3] VALIDATION OF 5 ALTERNATIVE METHODS (4 CELL TESTS + HENS EGG TEST) FOR PREDICTIVE EYE IRRITATION TESTING (DRAIZE TEST)
    REINHARDT, CA
    AESCHBACHER, M
    BRACHER, M
    SPENGLER, J
    [J]. EXPERIENTIA, 1987, 43 (06): : 708 - 708
  • [4] Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy as an alternative to the Draize eye irritation test
    Chacon, Manuel
    Vazquez, Natalia
    Alonso-Alonso, Sergio
    Persinal-Medina, Mairobi
    Alcalde, Ignacio
    Merayo-Lloves, Jesus
    Meana, Alvaro
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2023, 64 (08)
  • [5] Evaluation of the EpiOcular™ tissue model as an alternative to the Draize eye irritation test
    Stern, M
    Klausner, M
    Alvarado, R
    Renskers, K
    Dickens, M
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 1998, 12 (04) : 455 - 461
  • [6] JUSTIFICATION OF THE ENUCLEATED EYE TEST WITH EYES OF SLAUGHTERHOUSE ANIMALS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE DRAIZE EYE IRRITATION TEST WITH RABBITS
    PRINSEN, MK
    KOETER, HBWM
    [J]. FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1993, 31 (01) : 69 - 76
  • [7] The EC/HO international validation study on alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test
    Balls, M
    Botham, PA
    Bruner, LH
    Spielmann, H
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 1995, 9 (06) : 871 - 929
  • [8] INVITRO ALTERNATIVES TO THE DRAIZE EYE IRRITATION TEST
    GUPTA, KC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY-CUTANEOUS AND OCULAR TOXICOLOGY, 1989, 8 (01): : 7 - 16
  • [9] Evaluation of the HET-CAM-TSA method as an alternative to the Draize eye irritation test
    Gilleron, L
    Coecke, S
    Sysmans, M
    Hansen, E
    VanOproy, S
    Marzin, D
    VanCauteren, H
    Vanparys, P
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 1997, 11 (05) : 641 - 644
  • [10] Two validation programmes for alternative methods to the rabbit eye irritation test in Japan
    Kato, S
    [J]. PROGRESS IN THE REDUCTION, REFINEMENT AND REPLACEMENT OF ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION, 2000, 31 : 571 - 585