EFFICACY OF LEVOCABASTINE IN CONJUNCTIVAL PROVOCATION STUDIES

被引:17
|
作者
JANSSENS, M
机构
[1] Janssen Research Foundation, Beerse
关键词
ALLERGY; CONJUNCTIVITIS; HISTAMINE; LEVOCABASTINE; PROVOCATION STUDIES;
D O I
10.1007/BF00161022
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Levocabastine is a new topical histamine H-1 antagonist. The antihistaminic and antiallergic effects of levocabastine eye drops have been evaluated in eight conjuctival provocation studies (n=238). Two studies used a histamine challenge; five studies used allergen challenge; one study used both and in one study allergic provocation was with compound 48/80. In all but one study, only one single dose of levocabastine (one or two drops) was given. Six studies were against placebo only; one was against cromoglycate and one study used both placebo and cromoglycate as reference drugs. Single instillation of levocabastine eye drops protected against histamine and allergen-induced ocular symptoms within a period of 10 minutes. Levocabastine eye drops significantly alleviated conjunctival itching, redness, chemosis, eyelid swelling and tearing induced by histamine or allergen challenge (p less-than-or-equal-to 0.05). Four hours after administration levocabastine was still active. With levocabastine, but not with cromoglycate, a significant increase was observed in the allergen threshold. Even when compared to cromoglycate given as a pre-treatment four times daily for two weeks before the allergen challenge, a single dose of levocabastine was significantly more effective in inhibiting hyperaemia, eyelid sweling, chemosis and tearing (all p < 0.05). In conclusion, conjunctival provocation studies have established that levocabastine has a rapid and long-lasting effect in protecting against histamine or allergen-induced conjunctival symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 351
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ADVERSE REACTIONS TO THE ALLERGEN CONJUNCTIVAL PROVOCATION TEST
    Mercer Mourao, Elizabeth Maria
    Rosario, Nelson Augusto
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2011, 107 (04) : 373 - 374
  • [32] EFFECT OF CETIRIZINE IN A CONJUNCTIVAL PROVOCATION TEST WITH ALLERGENS
    SCHOENEICH, M
    PECOUD, AR
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 1990, 20 (02): : 171 - 174
  • [33] Conjunctival effects of a selective nasal pollen provocation
    Callebaut, I.
    Spielberg, L.
    Hox, V.
    Bobic, S.
    Jorissen, M.
    Stalmans, I.
    Scadding, G.
    Ceuppens, J. L.
    Hellings, P. W.
    ALLERGY, 2010, 65 (09) : 1173 - 1181
  • [34] Imaging analysis of conjunctival provocation by placebo treatment
    Astvatsatourov, A.
    Gloistein, C.
    Moesges, R.
    ALLERGY, 2015, 70 : 120 - 120
  • [35] SPECIFICITY AND SAFETY OF THE CONJUNCTIVAL PROVOCATION TEST (CPT)
    BARDARE, M
    VICI, EF
    BUSCHINI, MP
    VIGNALI, F
    MIRADOLI, S
    RATIGLIA, R
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 1986, 20 (10) : 1051 - 1051
  • [36] Practice of nasal, conjunctival and labial Provocation test
    Pfuetzner, W.
    JOURNAL DER DEUTSCHEN DERMATOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT, 2011, 9 : 87 - 87
  • [37] Nedocromil sodium and levocabastine reduce the symptoms of conjunctival allergen challenge by different mechanisms
    Ahluwalia, P
    Anderson, DF
    Wilson, SJ
    McGill, JI
    Church, MK
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2001, 108 (03) : 449 - 454
  • [38] Comparative efficacy of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus levocabastine 0.05% ophthalmic suspension using the conjunctival allergen challenge model
    Abelson, MB
    Greiner, JV
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2004, 20 (12) : 1953 - 1958
  • [39] Efficacy and safety of ketotifen fumarate eye drops versus vehicle placebo and levocabastine in an environmental study of patients with seasonal allergic conjunctival.
    Fsadni, MG
    Lanz, R
    Taylor, HR
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2000, 41 (04) : S368 - S368
  • [40] PROTECTIVE EFFECT OF LORATADINE ON SPECIFIC CONJUNCTIVAL PROVOCATION TEST
    CIPRANDI, G
    BUSCAGLIA, S
    PESCE, GP
    MARCHESI, E
    CANONICA, GW
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND APPLIED IMMUNOLOGY, 1991, 96 (04): : 344 - 347