LIGHT-DISTRIBUTION IN APPLE ORCHARD SYSTEMS IN RELATION TO PRODUCTION AND FRUIT-QUALITY

被引:66
|
作者
WAGENMAKERS, PS [1 ]
CALLESEN, O [1 ]
机构
[1] RES CTR HORT,DK-5792 AARSLEV,DENMARK
来源
JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE | 1995年 / 70卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1080/14620316.1995.11515369
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
The effect of tree density (2000, 2667, and 4000 trees per ha) and the ratio of between to within-row distance (1:1, 2:1, and 3:1) on light interception, fruit production, colour and individual fruit weight was evaluated in a ten-year comparative field study with apple at two sites in The Netherlands (51 degrees 30' and 52 degrees 0' N) and one site in Denmark (55 degrees 30'). For each combination of tree density and rectangularity, trees were pruned at three heights (1.50, 1.88, or 2.25 m). Fruit production over nine years and seasonal incoming radiation between bloom and harvest were 20 and 15% greater in The Netherlands. Climate-based estimates of potential production as provided by a crop-growth model, predicted 18% higher fruit production in The Netherlands. Production was proportional to light interception and increased with tree density, but the amount of well-coloured fruit per ha in later years did not increase with planting density. With more than 70% tight interception in later years, a large proportion of shade within the canopy was found. Fruits were smaller and less coloured at the Danish site. Fruits were more coloured in the taller and more open trees, even at the highest tree densities. Plantings with 1:3. and 2:1 between-to within-row distances intercepted more light and had a more uniform light distribution than 3:1 designs. This led to higher fruit production and better fruit colour. Fruit weight was not influenced by tree density, rectangularity, or tree height.
引用
收藏
页码:935 / 948
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] NITROGEN DISTRIBUTION WITHIN A LUCERNE CANOPY DURING REGROWTH - RELATION WITH LIGHT-DISTRIBUTION
    LEMAIRE, G
    ONILLON, B
    GOSSE, G
    CHARTIER, M
    ALLIRAND, JM
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1991, 68 (06) : 483 - 488
  • [32] FRUIT ABSCISSION, FRUIT-QUALITY, AND RESIDUE LEVELS OF DICHLORPROP USED TO CONTROL PREHARVEST DROP OF APPLE
    MARINI, RP
    BYERS, RE
    SOWERS, D
    MARINI, ME
    YOUNG, RW
    HORTSCIENCE, 1988, 23 (04) : 717 - 719
  • [33] NITROGEN AND WATER EFFECTS ON NUTRITION, GROWTH, CROP YIELD AND FRUIT-QUALITY OF ORCHARD-GROWN COXS ORANGE PIPPIN APPLE-TREES
    GOODE, JE
    HIGGS, KH
    HYRYCZ, KJ
    JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1978, 53 (04): : 295 - 306
  • [34] Application of an Exhausted Fermentation Broth Obtained from Biohydrogen Production in an Apple Orchard: Assessment of Fruit Quality
    Galiano, Michele
    Perulli, Giulio Demetrio
    Morandi, Brunella
    Di Gioia, Diana
    FERMENTATION-BASEL, 2023, 9 (07):
  • [35] EFFECT OF A FOLIAR UREA APPLICATION AND MITE INJURY ON YIELD AND FRUIT-QUALITY OF APPLE
    BEERS, EH
    HULL, LA
    GREENE, GM
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1990, 83 (02) : 552 - 556
  • [36] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TEMPERATURE AND FRUIT-QUALITY OF APPLE CULTIVARS GROWN AT DIFFERENT LOCATIONS
    TOMANA, T
    YAMADA, H
    JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1988, 56 (04): : 391 - 397
  • [37] TREE GROWTH AND PRODUCTIVITY AND POSTHARVEST FRUIT-QUALITY IN VARIOUS STRAINS OF DELICIOUS APPLE
    FALLAHI, E
    SIMONS, BR
    FELLMAN, JK
    LONGSTROTH, MA
    COLT, WM
    KETCHIE, DO
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1994, 119 (03) : 389 - 395
  • [38] THE EFFECT OF EUROPEAN RED MITE FEEDING ON THE FRUIT-QUALITY OF MILLER STURDEESPUR APPLE
    AMES, GK
    JOHNSON, DT
    ROM, RC
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1984, 109 (06) : 834 - 837
  • [39] YIELD COMPONENTS AND FRUIT-QUALITY OF STARKSPUR SUPREME DELICIOUS APPLE ON SEVERAL ROOTSTOCKS
    SILLERCEPEDA, JH
    LOMBARD, P
    HORTSCIENCE, 1988, 23 (01) : 29 - 29
  • [40] Fruit quality in relation to fertigation of apple trees
    Dolega, EK
    Link, H
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND WORKSHOP ON POME FRUIT QUALITY, 1998, (466): : 109 - 114