Meta-analytic review of disclosure level and cost of equity capital

被引:31
|
作者
Souissi, Mohsen [1 ]
Khlif, Hichem [2 ]
机构
[1] Fayetteville State Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Fayetteville, NC 28301 USA
[2] Univ Mahdia, Sch Econ Sci & Management, Sfax, Tunisia
关键词
Accounting; Disclosure; Equity capital; Voluntary disclosure; Non-financial disclosure; Cost of equity capital; Disclosure environment;
D O I
10.1108/18347641211201072
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to meta-analyze the results of 22 empirical studies that examine the relationship between voluntary disclosure and cost of equity capital. The authors examine whether differences in results are attributable to moderating effects related to disclosure environment, the measurement of the disclosure score and the proxy used to measure the cost of equity capital. Design/methodology/approach - The approach used is the meta-analysis statistic technique developed by Hunter et al. Findings - The results emphasize the need to explicitly consider the legal and institutional aspects (high disclosure environment versus low disclosure environment) when one analyzes the association between disclosure level and cost of equity capital. Originality/value - Since the authors' analysis confirms the negative association between disclosure and cost of equity capital in countries characterized by low disclosure environment, managers in these contexts are encouraged to make more voluntary disclosure in order to reduce uncertainty among investors and increase the marketability of their securities.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / +
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Transfer of Training: A Meta-Analytic Review
    Blume, Brian D.
    Ford, J. Kevin
    Baldwin, Timothy T.
    Huang, Jason L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2010, 36 (04) : 1065 - 1105
  • [42] Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Approach
    Gallardo-Vazquez, Dolores
    Barroso-Mendez, Maria J.
    Pajuelo-Moreno, Maria L.
    Sanchez-Meca, Julio
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (04)
  • [43] Leadership and stress: A meta-analytic review
    Harms, P. D.
    Crede, Marcus
    Tynan, Michael
    Leon, Matthew
    Jeung, Wonho
    [J]. LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2017, 28 (01): : 178 - 194
  • [44] Illusion of control: A meta-analytic review
    Presson, PK
    Benassi, VA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 1996, 11 (03): : 493 - 510
  • [45] Impulse buying: a meta-analytic review
    Gopalkrishnan R. Iyer
    Markus Blut
    Sarah Hong Xiao
    Dhruv Grewal
    [J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2020, 48 : 384 - 404
  • [46] PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL IN ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT: A META-ANALYTIC STUDY
    Rus, Claudia Lenuta
    De Jesus, Saul Neves
    [J]. MODERN RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY: QUANTITATIVE VS QUALITATIVE RESEARCH?, 2010, : 142 - +
  • [47] The generation effect: A meta-analytic review
    Bertsch, Sharon
    Pesta, Bryan J.
    Wiscott, Richard
    McDaniel, Mchael A.
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2007, 35 (02) : 201 - 210
  • [48] DEPRESSION AND IMMUNITY - A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW
    HERBERT, TB
    COHEN, S
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1993, 113 (03) : 472 - 486
  • [49] A review of meta-analytic research in accounting
    Khlif, Hichem
    Chalmers, Keryn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING LITERATURE, 2015, 35 : 1 - 27
  • [50] REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS IN META-ANALYTIC METHOD
    BANGERTDROWNS, RL
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1986, 99 (03) : 388 - 399