CROSS-REACTIVITIES OF CYCLOSPORINE-G (NVA(2) CYCLOSPORINE) AND METABOLITES IN CYCLOSPORINE-A IMMUNOASSAYS

被引:0
|
作者
YATSCOFF, RW [1 ]
LANGMAN, LJ [1 ]
LEGATT, DF [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV ALBERTA,DEPT LAB MED & PATHOL,EDMONTON T6G 2B7,AB,CANADA
关键词
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; VARIATION; SOURCE OF; CYCLOSPORINE; CALIBRATION; MONITORING THERAPY; IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE DRUGS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Immunoassays of cyclosporin A (CsA) have been routinely used to measure CsG. We investigated the cross-reactivities of CsG and its metabolites, as well as the proportion CsG constitutes in relation to total drug measured, for six CsG metabolites (GM1, GM9, GM4N, GM1c, GM1c9, GM19) in the following CsA assays: Sandimmune selective RIA (SS), Sandimmune nonselective RIA (NS), Cyclotrac SP-RIA (CT), fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA), and enzyme immunoassay (EMIT(TM)). The cross-reactivity of CsG in these assays was as follows: SS, FPIA, CT, approximately 100%; NS, approximately 40%; EMIT, < 2%. The cross-reactivities of CsG metabolites were investigated in all assays except EMIT and varied among metabolites and assays. The most significant variance was found with the NS assay, where most of the metabolites exhibited cross-reactivities of > 40%. In contrast, in the SS, FPIA, and CT assays, cross-reactivites of < 5% were observed for most of the metabolites. The ranking of cross-reactivites of CsG metabolites in the assays is SS = CT < FPIA < NS. The degree of cross-reactivity did not change significantly when the SS, CT, and FPIA assays were calibrated with CsG instead of CsA-whether parent CsG was present or not. The data suggest that the SS, CT, and FPIA methods would be suitable for the routine monitoring of CsG.
引用
收藏
页码:1089 / 1092
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ENHANCING EFFECT OF CYCLOSPORINE-A AND CYCLOSPORINE-G ON BONE-MARROW COLONY FORMATION
    KALECHMAN, Y
    SREDNI, B
    CASPI, RR
    NUSSENBLATT, RB
    EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY, 1990, 18 (10) : 1104 - 1107
  • [22] EVIDENCE THAT CYCLOSPORINE-G IS LESS DELETERIOUS TO RAT BONE INVIVO THAN CYCLOSPORINE-A
    STEIN, B
    TAKIZAWA, M
    SCHLOSBERG, M
    MOVSOWITZ, C
    FALLON, M
    BERLIN, JA
    EPSTEIN, S
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1992, 53 (03) : 628 - 632
  • [23] EFFECTS OF CYCLOSPORINE-A AND CYCLOSPORINE-G ON ADP-STIMULATED AGGREGATION OF HUMAN PLATELETS
    MARKELL, MS
    FERNANDEZ, J
    NAIK, UP
    EHRLICH, Y
    KORNECKI, E
    IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE AND ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS, 1993, 696 : 404 - 407
  • [24] INVIVO FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY REVEALS CYCLOSPORINE-G TO BE LESS NEPHROTOXIC THAN CYCLOSPORINE-A
    ROOTH, P
    DAWIDSON, I
    DILLER, K
    CLOTHIER, N
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1988, 20 (02) : 707 - 709
  • [25] QUANTIFICATION OF CYCLOSPORINE G (NVA2 CYCLOSPORINE) BY RADIOIMMUNOASSY
    YATSCOFF, RW
    JEFFERY, JR
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1986, 32 (04) : 700 - 701
  • [26] A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CYCLOSPORINE-A, CYCLOSPORINE-D, AND CYCLOSPORINE-G IN THE TREATMENT OF EXPERIMENTAL AUTOIMMUNE UVEITIS IN RATS
    NUSSENBLATT, RB
    CASPI, RR
    DINNING, WJ
    PALESTINE, AG
    HIESTAND, P
    BOREL, J
    JOURNAL OF IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY, 1986, 8 (03): : 427 - 435
  • [27] COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF CYCLOSPORINE-A AND CYCLOSPORINE-G ON ADP-STIMULATED PLATELET-AGGREGATION
    MARKELL, MS
    FERNANDEZ, J
    NAIK, U
    EHRLICH, Y
    KORNECKI, E
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1993, 41 (02): : A126 - A126
  • [28] CONVERSION FROM CYCLOSPORINE-G (CYS-G) TO CYCLOSPORINE-A (CYS-A) DECREASES GFR
    LYNN, M
    JONES, F
    CURTIS, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 1995, 6 (03): : 1101 - 1101
  • [29] INVITRO EFFECTS OF CYCLOSPORINE-A AND CYCLOSPORINE-G ON ACTIVATION OF AN AUTOIMMUNE T-CELL LINE
    CASPI, RR
    MCALLISTER, CG
    GERY, I
    BOREL, J
    HIESTAND, P
    NUSSENBLATT, RB
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1988, 20 (02) : 110 - 114
  • [30] IMMUNOPATHOLOGICAL CHANGES IN THE SPLEEN OF BALB/C MICE TREATED WITH EITHER CYCLOSPORINE-A OR CYCLOSPORINE-G
    MASRI, MA
    NAIEM, M
    DAAR, AS
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1989, 21 (01) : 952 - 953