The use of a decision support tool in construction dispute negotiation

被引:0
|
作者
Cheung, Sai On [1 ]
Yiu, Kenneth T. W. [1 ]
Chung, Ryan K. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Bldg & Construct, Construct Dispute Resolut Res Unit, Kowloon, Peoples R China
来源
AUSTRALASIAN DISPUTE RESOLUTION JOURNAL | 2005年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Negotiation is an indispensable part of dispute resolution in the construction industry. Disputants should be well prepared before the process begins. To achieve this, one of the prerequisites in preparing construction dispute negotiation is to understand one's case, in particular, the bottom line. The decision-maker can conduct self-analysis and prepare alternatives before any resolution process begins. This article aims to introduce the use of a decision support tool, modelled on the technique of a decision tree, to achieve such purposes. The tool operates on a computing environment provided by a software called "Precision Tree". The operation procedure of the analysis shall include three stages: (1) issue identification, (2) outcome identification and (3) analysis. A hypothetical case is used to illustrate the working of this tool. As such, a decision-maker can identify the probability of success and the expected profit for each alternative in this case. With the use of sensitivity analysis, the bottom line figure of each issue can be identified. It is suggested that using such a decision support tool enables a systematic and rational self-analysis in preparing for construction dispute negotiation.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 186
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A negotiation support tool using emotional factors
    Yuasa, M
    Yasumura, Y
    Nitta, K
    JOINT 9TH IFSA WORLD CONGRESS AND 20TH NAFIPS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS. 1-5, 2001, : 2906 - 2911
  • [32] Alternative approaches for development of a construction-specific decision support tool for sustainable construction operations
    Small, Edgar P.
    Al Mazrooei, Mansoor
    ICSDEC 2016 - INTEGRATING DATA SCIENCE, CONSTRUCTION AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 145 : 1013 - 1020
  • [33] Acceptance and Use of LCC as a Decision Support Tool for Renovation Investments
    Gluch, Pernilla
    Gustafsson, Mathias
    ICCREM 2015: ENVIRONMENT AND THE SUSTAINABLE BUILDING, 2015, : 821 - 828
  • [34] Use of a contraceptive decision support tool in the abortion care setting * , **
    Lerma, Klaira
    McBrayer, Alexandra
    Nathan, Sacheen
    Dehlendorf, Christine
    White, Kari
    CONTRACEPTION, 2022, 113 : 68 - 70
  • [35] Decision support tool use in colorectal surgery: what is the role?
    Hechenbleikner, Elizabeth
    Makary, Martin
    Samarov, Daniel
    Leung, Curtis
    Miller, Jason D.
    Deutschendorf, Amy
    Brotman, Daniel J.
    Holland, Diane E.
    Bowles, Kathryn H.
    Wick, Elizabeth C.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 194 (01) : 69 - 76
  • [36] The role of justice for cooperation and contract's moderating effect in construction dispute negotiation
    Lu, Wenxue
    Li, Zhi
    Wang, Siqi
    ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 24 (01) : 133 - 153
  • [37] A decision-support tool for risk and complexity assessment and visualization in construction projects
    Dikmen, Irem
    Atasoy, Guzide
    Erol, Huseyin
    Kaya, Hazal Deniz
    Birgonul, M. Talat
    COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2022, 141
  • [38] 4D annotator: A visual decision support tool for construction planners
    Liston, KM
    Fischer, M
    Kunz, J
    COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1998, : 330 - 341
  • [39] SimulEICon :A Multi-objective Decision-support Tool for Sustainable Construction
    Zhu, Yimin
    Inyim, Peeraya
    Rivera, Joseph
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSTRUCTION & REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2012, : 134 - 138
  • [40] Scheduling tools for the construction industry: overview and decision support system for tool selection
    Desgagne-Lebeuf, Alexandre
    Lehoux, Nadia
    Beauregard, Robert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22 (14) : 2687 - 2698