Reflexivity in the co-production of academic-practitioner research

被引:0
|
作者
Orr, Kevin [1 ]
Bennett, Mike [2 ]
机构
[1] Hull Univ, Sch Business, Ctr Management & Org Learning, Kingston Upon Hull, N Humberside, England
[2] Soc Local Author Chief Execut & Senior Managers S, London, England
关键词
Research work; Organizational politics; Storytelling; United Kingdom;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to offer a reflexive account of the co-production of a qualitative research project with the aim of illuminating the relationships between research participants. Design/methodology/approach - The paper draws upon personal experience of designing and conducting a research project into management learning, run jointly between an academic and a senior practitioner. The methodological issues involved and the reflexive dynamics of how the work of research collaboration is accomplished are considered. Findings - Engaging with radical reflexivity helps to produce insights about the co-production process. Originality/value - This paper contributes to the field of reflexivity and is innovative in its context of academic-practitioner research.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 102
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Forging cleaner production: the importance of academic-practitioner links for successful sustainability embedded carbon accounting
    Burritt, Roger L.
    Tingey-Holyoak, Joanne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 36 : 39 - 47
  • [32] Supporting collaborative research in information science: The RADAR program as a model for academic-practitioner team engagement
    Given, Lisa M.
    Partridge, Helen
    Howard, Katherine
    [J]. LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2022, 44 (02)
  • [33] Academic-practitioner collaboration need not require joint or relevant research: Toward a relational scholarship of integration
    Bartunek, Jean M.
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 50 (06): : 1323 - 1333
  • [34] Academic-practitioner engaged scholarship RICK section of Information & Organization
    Van de Ven, Andrew H.
    [J]. INFORMATION AND ORGANIZATION, 2018, 28 (01) : 37 - 43
  • [35] Effective academic-practitioner collaboration on gender research in federal law enforcement: the value of a coproduction process
    Yu, Helen H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2020, 86 (03) : 567 - 581
  • [36] Reflections on deep academic-practitioner partnering for generative societal impact
    Slawinski, Natalie
    Brito, Bruna
    Brenton, Jennifer
    Smith, Wendy
    [J]. STRATEGIC ORGANIZATION, 2024,
  • [37] Academics and Practitioners Are Alike and Unlike: The Paradoxes of Academic-Practitioner Relationships
    Bartunek, Jean Marie
    Rynes, Sara Lynn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2014, 40 (05) : 1181 - 1201
  • [38] Stepping out of the Comfort Zone? Challenges, Advantages and Good Practices When Conducting Academic-Practitioner Research
    Lana De Pelecijn
    Yinthe Feys
    [J]. Journal of Policy Practice and Research, 2021, 2 (3): : 178 - 193
  • [39] Evaluating the quality of research co-production: Research Quality Plus for Co-Production (RQ + 4 Co-Pro)
    Robert K. D. McLean
    Fred Carden
    Alice B. Aiken
    Rebecca Armstrong
    Judy Bray
    Christine E. Cassidy
    Olivia Daub
    Erica Di Ruggiero
    Leslie A. Fierro
    Michelle Gagnon
    Alison M. Hutchinson
    Roman Kislov
    Anita Kothari
    Sara Kreindler
    Chris McCutcheon
    Jessica Reszel
    Gayle Scarrow
    Ian D. Graham
    [J]. Health Research Policy and Systems, 21
  • [40] Shore up research co-production
    Kernecker, Maria
    Busse, Maria
    Zscheischler, Jana
    [J]. NATURE, 2019, 573 (7775) : 495 - 495