Detecting controlling nodes of boolean regulatory networks

被引:2
|
作者
Schober, Steffen [1 ]
Kracht, David [1 ]
Heckel, Reinhard [1 ,2 ]
Bossert, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Ulm Univ, Inst Telecommun & Appl Informat, Ulm, Germany
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Commun Technol Lab, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1687-4153-2011-6
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Boolean models of regulatory networks are assumed to be tolerant to perturbations. That qualitatively implies that each function can only depend on a few nodes. Biologically motivated constraints further show that functions found in Boolean regulatory networks belong to certain classes of functions, for example, the unate functions. It turns out that these classes have specific properties in the Fourier domain. That motivates us to study the problem of detecting controlling nodes in classes of Boolean networks using spectral techniques. We consider networks with unbalanced functions and functions of an average sensitivity less than 2/3 k, where k is the number of controlling variables for a function. Further, we consider the class of 1-low networks which include unate networks, linear threshold networks, and networks with nested canalyzing functions. We show that the application of spectral learning algorithms leads to both better time and sample complexity for the detection of controlling nodes compared with algorithms based on exhaustive search. For a particular algorithm, we state analytical upper bounds on the number of samples needed to find the controlling nodes of the Boolean functions. Further, improved algorithms for detecting controlling nodes in large-scale unate networks are given and numerically studied.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Orbit-controlling Sets for Conjunctive Boolean Networks
    Gao, Zuguang
    Chen, Xudong
    Basar, Tamer
    2017 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2017, : 4989 - 4994
  • [22] State-controlling Sets for Conjunctive Boolean Networks
    Gao, Zuguang
    Chen, Xudong
    Basar, Tamer
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2017, 50 (01): : 14290 - 14295
  • [23] Detecting compromised nodes in wireless sensor networks
    Mathews, Mary
    Song, Min
    Shetty, Sachin
    McKenzie, Rick
    SNPD 2007: EIGHTH ACIS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, NETWORKING, AND PARALLEL/DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 273 - +
  • [24] Detecting Sybil Nodes in Static and Dynamic Networks
    Cardenas-Haro, Jose Antonio
    Konjevod, Goran
    ON THE MOVE TO MEANINGFUL INTERNET SYSTEMS: OTM 2010, PT II, 2010, 6427 : 894 - 917
  • [25] Detecting responsible nodes in differential Bayesian networks
    Huang, Xianzheng
    Zhang, Hongmei
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 43 (17) : 3294 - 3312
  • [26] Detecting phantom nodes in wireless sensor networks
    Hwang, Joengmin
    He, Tian
    Kifn, Yongdae
    INFOCOM 2007, VOLS 1-5, 2007, : 2391 - +
  • [27] Method for identification of sensitive nodes in Boolean models of biological networks
    Dnyane, Pooja A.
    Puntambekar, Shraddha S.
    Gadgil, Chetan J.
    IET SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, 2018, 12 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [28] On the number of driver nodes for controlling a Boolean network when the targets are restricted to attractors
    Hou, Wenpin
    Ruan, Peiying
    Ching, Wai-Ki
    Akutsu, Tatsuya
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2019, 463 : 1 - 11
  • [29] Boolean modeling of gene regulatory networks: Driesch redux
    Arnosti, David N.
    Ay, Ahmet
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (45) : 18239 - 18240
  • [30] Modeling gene regulatory systems by random Boolean networks
    Dubrova, E
    BIOENGINEERED AND BIOINSPIRED SYSTEMS II, 2005, 5839 : 56 - 65