Diagnosis and Treatment of a Neck Node Swelling Suspicious for a Malignancy: An Algorithmic Approach

被引:10
|
作者
Balm, A. J. M. [1 ,2 ]
van Velthuysen, M. L. F. [3 ]
Hoebers, F. J. P. [4 ]
Vogel, W. V. [5 ]
van den Brekel, M. W. M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Head & Neck Oncol & Surg, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Pathol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiotherapy, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Nucl Med, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1155/2010/581540
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim. To present an up-to-date algorithm incorporating recent advances regarding its diagnosis and treatment. Method. A Medline/Pubmed search was performed to identify relevant studies published in English from 1990 until 2008. Only clinical studies were identified and were used as basis for the diagnostic algorithm. Results. The eligible literature provided only observational evidence. The vast majority of neck nodes from occult primaries (>90%) represent SCC with a high incidence among middle aged man. Smoking and alcohol abuse are important risk factors. Asiatic and North African patients with neck node metastases are at risk of harbouring an occult nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The remainder are adenocarcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma, melanoma, thyroid carcinoma and Merkel cell carcinoma. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) reaches sensitivity and specificity percentages of 81% and 100%, respectively and plays an important role as the second diagnostic step after routine ENT mirror and/or endoscopic examination. FDG-PET/CT has proven to be helpful in identifying occult primary carcinomas of the head and neck, especially when applied as a guiding tool prior to panendoscopy, and may induce treatment related clinical decisions in up to 60% of cases. Conclusion. Although reports on the diagnostic process offer mainly descriptive studies, current information seems sufficient to formulate a diagnostic algorithm to contribute to a more systematic diagnostic approach preventing unnecessary steps.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biopsy diagnosis of colitis: an algorithmic approach
    Patil, Deepa T.
    Odze, Robert D.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2018, 472 (01) : 67 - 80
  • [22] SPOT DIAGNOSIS Breathlessness and neck swelling after a rugby gameBreathlessness and neck swelling after a rugby game
    Gittoes, Oliver M. J.
    Gittoes, Neil J. L.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 356
  • [23] An algorithmic approach to the differential diagnosis of dementia
    Graham, JE
    Mitnitski, AB
    Mogilner, AJ
    Gauvreau, D
    Rockwood, K
    DEMENTIA, 1996, 7 (06): : 324 - 330
  • [24] Algorithmic approach in the diagnosis of pediatric uveitis
    Farhad Salehzadeh
    Pediatric Rheumatology, 22
  • [25] Cutaneous vasculitis; An algorithmic approach to diagnosis
    Alpsoy, Erkan
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [26] AN ALGORITHMIC APPROACH TO THE DIAGNOSIS OF HYDRONEPHROSIS IN CHILDREN
    BRAREN, V
    SANDLER, MP
    PARTAIN, CL
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1986, 135 (04): : A329 - A329
  • [27] An algorithmic approach to the diagnosis of chronic dyspnea
    Abouzgheib, Wissam B.
    Pratter, Melvin
    Akers, Steven
    Kass, Jonathan
    Lotano, Ramya
    Bartter, Thaddeus
    CHEST, 2007, 132 (04) : 612S - 612S
  • [28] An Algorithmic Approach to the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Neoplasms
    Klimstra, David S.
    Pitman, Martha B.
    Hruban, Ralph H.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2009, 133 (03) : 454 - 464
  • [29] Biopsy diagnosis of colitis: an algorithmic approach
    Deepa T. Patil
    Robert D. Odze
    Virchows Archiv, 2018, 472 : 67 - 80
  • [30] The Purple Digit An Algorithmic Approach to Diagnosis
    Brown, Patrick J.
    Zirwas, Matthew J.
    English, Joseph C., III
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DERMATOLOGY, 2010, 11 (02) : 103 - 116