Stock selection using a hybrid MCDM approach

被引:10
|
作者
Poklepovic, Tea [1 ]
Babic, Zoran [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Split, Fac Econ, Cvite Fiskovica 5, Split 21000, Croatia
关键词
MCDM approach; Spearman's rank coefficient; stock selection;
D O I
10.17535/crorr.2014.0013
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The problem of selecting the right stocks to invest in is of immense interest for investors on both emerging and developed capital markets. Moreover, an investor should take into account all available data regarding stocks on the particular market. This includes fundamental and stock market indicators. The decision making process includes several stocks to invest in and more than one criterion. Therefore, the task of selecting the stocks to invest in can be viewed as a multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problem. Using several MCDM methods often leads to divergent rankings. The goal of this paper is to resolve these possible divergent results obtained from different MCDM methods using a hybrid MCDM approach based on Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Five MCDM methods are selected: COPRAS, linear assignment, PROMETHEE, SAW and TOPSIS. The weights for all criteria are obtained by using the AHP method. Data for this study includes information on stock returns and traded volumes from March 2012 to March 2014 for 19 stocks on the Croatian capital market. It also includes the most important fundamental and stock market indicators for selected stocks. Rankings using five selected MCDM methods in the stock selection problem yield divergent results. However, after applying the proposed approach the final hybrid rankings are obtained. The results show that the worse stocks to invest in happen to be the same when the industry is taken into consideration or when not. However, when the industry is taken into account, the best stocks to invest in are slightly different, because some industries are more profitable than the others.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 290
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quality improvement pilot program selection based on dynamic hybrid MCDM approach
    Zhou, Fuli
    Wang, Xu
    Samvedi, Avinash
    INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2018, 118 (01) : 144 - 162
  • [32] A hybrid MCDM-FMOO approach for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation
    Mohammed, Ahmed
    Harris, Irina
    Govindan, Kannan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2019, 217 : 171 - 184
  • [33] Location selection for a textile manufacturing facility with GIS based on hybrid MCDM approach
    Ulutas, Alptekin
    Karakus, Can Bulent
    INDUSTRIA TEXTILA, 2021, 72 (02): : 126 - 132
  • [34] Decision making model for material selection using a hybrid MCDM technique
    Jajimoggala, S. (sarojini.jaji@gmail.com), 1600, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd., 29, route de Pre-Bois, Case Postale 856, CH-1215 Geneva 15, CH-1215, Switzerland (06):
  • [35] A Hybrid MCDM Approach for Strategic Project Portfolio Selection of Agro By-Products
    Debnath, Animesh
    Roy, Jagannath
    Kar, Samarjit
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Antucheviciene, Jurgita
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (08)
  • [36] A Hybrid MCDM Approach Based on Fuzzy ANP and Fuzzy TOPSIS for Technology Selection
    Aliakbari Nouri, Fahimeh
    Khalili Esbouei, Saber
    Antucheviciene, Jurgita
    INFORMATICA, 2015, 26 (03) : 369 - 388
  • [37] A Hybrid MCDM Approach for Selection of Financial Institution in Supply Chain Risk Management
    Chatterjee, Kajal
    Kar, Samarjit
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ - IEEE 2013), 2013,
  • [38] A fuzzy MCDM approach for personnel selection
    Dursun, Mehtap
    Karsak, E. Ertugrul
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (06) : 4324 - 4330
  • [39] A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection
    Shyur, Huan-Jyh
    Shih, Hsu-Shih
    MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2006, 44 (7-8) : 749 - 761
  • [40] A hybrid MCDM model for resilient supplier selection
    Haldar, Anupam
    Ray, Amitava
    Banerjee, Debamalya
    Ghosh, Surojit
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2012, 7 (04) : 284 - 292