Study of the Side effects profile of different antihypertensive drugs among the Hypertensive patient

被引:0
|
作者
Shrestha, R. K. [1 ]
Khan, G. M. [1 ]
Thapa, P. [1 ]
Koju, R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Kathmandu Univ, Dept Pharm, Kathmandu, Nepal
[2] Dhulikhel Hosp, Dept Med, Dhulikhel, Nepal
关键词
Antihypertensive drugs; Side effects; Enalapril; amlodipine;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Hypertension is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Because hypertension is usually asymptomatic yet requires long term therapy, consideration of potential of undesirable effects of drugs used for its treatment is important for making the appropriate choice. In this context, a precise understanding typical adverse reaction profile of the different drugs is essential. Objective This study was done to assess the side effects profile of different antihypertensive drugs (calcium channel blocker, beta blocker, ACE inhibitor) among the hypertensive patient. Methods A mixed retrospective & prospective cross sectional study of 61 patients was done at Medical Out Patient Department of Dhulikhel Hospital KUTH were included in the study. Result Dry cough was experienced by most of the patients (66.7%) and both dry cough and dizziness was reported by only one patient (6.7%) taking enalapril. In case of atenolol, bradycardia, dizziness and insomnia were experienced by same number of patients (14.3%) separately. Among amlodipine users, side effects experienced were peripheral edema (23%), flushing (2.6%), dyspnoea (2.6%), headache (5.1%), dizziness (2.6%), palpitation (2.6%) and insomnia (2.6%). Patients on enalapril had significantly more complaints regarding side effects (73.3%) compared to those taking amlodipine (41%) (OR=4, p=0.033) and atenolol (42.9%). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of side effects between enalapril-atenolol (p >0.05) and amlodipine-atenolol (p >0.05). Conclusion Although all three drugs were well tolerated, more side effects were seen in case of enalapril. Enalapril has 4 times higher rate of side effects than amlodipine.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 29
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of antihypertensive drugs on foetal growth in hypertensive pregnant women
    Lydakis, C
    Lip, GYH
    Beevers, M
    Churchill, D
    Beevers, DG
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1998, 16 : S236 - S236
  • [22] Different effects of antihypertensive drugs on endothelial dysfunction
    Puddu, P
    Puddu, GM
    Cravero, E
    Muscari, A
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2004, 59 (05) : 555 - 564
  • [23] Effects of different antihypertensive drugs on endothelial function
    Konradi, A
    Laniscova, E
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2004, 22 : S31 - S31
  • [24] A TOXICITY INDEX FOR COMPARISON OF SIDE-EFFECTS AMONG DIFFERENT DRUGS
    FRIES, JF
    SPITZ, PW
    WILLIAMS, CA
    BLOCH, DA
    SINGH, G
    HUBERT, HB
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1990, 33 (01): : 121 - 130
  • [25] Cardiac protection in hypertensive diabetics: Efficacy and safety of different antihypertensive drugs
    Pessina, AC
    XXI CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, : 623 - 626
  • [26] Case-control study of the risk factors of side effects under antihypertensive drugs
    Allaert, FA
    Causse, C
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2004, 22 : S398 - S398
  • [27] PATIENT REPORTED SIDE-EFFECTS TO ANTIHYPERTENSIVE MEDICATIONS
    CURB, JD
    BORHANI, NO
    WILLIAMS, W
    JOHNSON, J
    ZIMBALDI, N
    BLASZKOWSKI, T
    FOTIU, S
    CIRCULATION, 1980, 62 (04) : 306 - 306
  • [28] SURVEY OF 150 PHYSICIANS ON THE SIDE-EFFECTS OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS
    LAGANIERE, S
    BIRON, P
    UNION MEDICALE DU CANADA, 1980, 109 (02): : 252 - &
  • [29] SIDE-EFFECTS OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS - INCIDENCE AND METHODS OF COLLECTION
    COSTA, FV
    AMBROSIONI, E
    MAGNANI, B
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND BIOPHARMACY, 1979, 17 (09): : 405 - 409
  • [30] Effects of centrally acting antihypertensive drugs on the microcirculation of spontaneously hypertensive rats
    Estato, V
    Araújo, CV
    Bousquet, P
    Tibiriçá, E
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2004, 37 (10) : 1541 - 1549