Auditor industry specialization and corporate risk-taking

被引:16
|
作者
Hoelscher, Jamie L. [1 ]
Seavey, Scott E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Southern Illinois Univ Edwardsville, Dept Accounting, Edwardsville, IL 62025 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Dept Accounting, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
关键词
Monitoring; Audit; Corporate risk; Industry specialists;
D O I
10.1108/MAJ-02-2014-1000
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of higher-quality auditors on corporate risk-taking. Design/methodology/approach - Agency theory suggests that managers have incentives to avoid risk in the interests of perquisite consumption and self-preservation, while investors prefer that managers invest in all projects with a positive net present value, i.e. projects that generally increase corporate risk. Empirical literature finds that managerial risk-aversion is mitigated (and firm value enhanced) when investor protection is higher. The authors examine whether higher-quality auditing is one such mechanism to encourage shareholder-focused corporate risk-taking. They model measures of corporate risk as a function of whether a firm is audited by an industry specialist or not, controlling specifically for accounting quality. They then examine the incremental effect of higher-quality audits on other forms of external monitoring (analyst coverage and institutional holdings) for corporate risk. Findings - Using a sample from 2003 to 2007, the authors document a positive relationship between local-level audit industry specialization and both the standard deviation of annual stock returns and research and development expenditures (their measures of corporate risk-taking). They then find the effect is mitigated when firms have alternative external monitoring, in the form of either higher analyst coverage or greater institutional holdings. Research limitations/implications - Given the nature of the question the authors ask, particularly in the context of the auditor-client relationship, a potential limitation is the difficulty in assigning causation. Nonetheless, this study underscores the importance of auditors as an effective mechanism for monitoring corporate managers. Originality/value - This study provides novel evidence that auditors affect managerial decision making beyond a simple effect on financial statements, and should be of interest to boards of directors, regulators and investors.
引用
收藏
页码:596 / 620
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Corporate Governance and Risk-Taking
    Schwarcz, Steven L.
    [J]. EUROPEAN COMPANY LAW, 2024, 21 (04): : 74 - 75
  • [2] Taxation and Corporate Risk-Taking
    Langenmayr, Dominika
    Lester, Rebecca
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2018, 93 (03): : 237 - 266
  • [3] Corporate Risk-Taking and Killing
    C M V Clarkson
    [J]. Risk Management, 2000, 2 (1) : 7 - 16
  • [4] Corporate governance and risk-taking
    John, Kose
    Litov, Lubomir
    Yeung, Bernard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2008, 63 (04): : 1679 - 1728
  • [5] Corporate risk-taking and performance: A 20 year look at the petroleum industry
    Walls, MR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2005, 48 (3-4) : 127 - 140
  • [6] Auditor Resignations and Auditor Industry Specialization
    Cenker, William J.
    Nagy, Albert L.
    [J]. ACCOUNTING HORIZONS, 2008, 22 (03) : 279 - 295
  • [7] Creditor rights and corporate risk-taking
    Acharya, Viral V.
    Amihud, Yakov
    Litov, Lubomir
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 102 (01) : 150 - 166
  • [8] Political Corruption and Corporate Risk-Taking
    Khieu, Hinh
    Nguyen, Nam H.
    Phan, Hieu, V
    Fulkerson, Jon A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2023, 184 (01) : 93 - 113
  • [9] Employment protection and corporate risk-taking
    Tran, Quoc Trung
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 51
  • [10] Political Corruption and Corporate Risk-Taking
    Hinh Khieu
    Nam H. Nguyen
    Hieu V. Phan
    Jon A. Fulkerson
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2023, 184 : 93 - 113