CRITERIA AND METHODS FOR PERFORMING AND EVALUATING SOLAR WEATHER STUDIES

被引:0
|
作者
FLUECK, JA [1 ]
BROWN, TJ [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV COLORADO, CIRES, BOULDER, CO 80309 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<0373:CAMFPA>2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Research criteria and methods are presented for performing and evaluating the growing discipline of solar-weather studies. A clear distinction among preliminary, exploratory, and confirmatory studies is presented, and it is shown that this distinction affects all dimensions and findings of a study. Particular attention is given to conceptual models, variables and data, sample designs, analyses, and formal ampliative inference issues under exploratory and confirmatory conditions. The utility of the proposed criteria and methods are illustrated by evaluating two recent solar-weather claims of strong association between solar flux and stratospheric temperature at the North Pole when partitioned by the phase of the quasi-biennial oscillation. The results of the evaluation indicate that these claims are only exploratory ones and are still in need of confirming evidence. Last, a reanalysis of the solar flux and temperature relation, using some of the proposed methods, indicates that the association actually changes with time, and thus, there appears to be other, presently unknown, factors that affect this potential solar-weather relation.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 385
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Criteria for evaluating qualitative studies
    Rocco, Tonette S.
    HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 13 (04) : 375 - 378
  • [2] METHODS AND CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITY
    RAIZBERG, B
    KOZHEVNIKOVA, G
    PROBLEMS OF ECONOMICS, 1978, 20 (10): : 35 - 54
  • [3] CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING FUZZY RANKING METHODS
    YUAN, YF
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1991, 43 (02) : 139 - 157
  • [4] Criteria for evaluating usability evaluation methods
    Hartson, HR
    Andre, RS
    Williges, RC
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2001, 13 (04) : 373 - 410
  • [5] Review of criteria for evaluating LCA weighting methods
    Johnsen, Fredrik Moltu
    Lokke, Soren
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (04): : 840 - 849
  • [6] The Criteria for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Preference Aggregation Methods
    Chen, Chen-Tung
    Lin, Ching-San
    Chen, Farn Shing
    Hung, Wei-Zhan
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY THEORY AND ITS APPLICATIONS (IFUZZY 2013), 2013, : 167 - 170
  • [7] Criteria and methods of evaluating the durability of the sealing materials
    Serebrennikova, N.D.
    Stroitel'nye Materialy, 2003, (12): : 22 - 24
  • [8] METHODS AND CRITERIA OF EVALUATING ACTIVE EXCHANGE IN COPEPODS
    PETIPA, TS
    OKEANOLOGIYA, 1984, 24 (05): : 831 - 835
  • [9] Generalized criteria for evaluating hotspot identification methods
    Guo, Xiaoyu
    Wu, Lingtao
    Lord, Dominique
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2020, 145
  • [10] METHODS AND CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING GINGIVAL TISSUE REACTIONS
    ZANDER, HA
    KENNEDY, J
    INTERNATIONAL DENTAL JOURNAL, 1970, 20 (03) : 493 - &