Developing and evaluating a methodology for business process improvement

被引:78
|
作者
Adesola, Sola [1 ]
Baines, Tim [1 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Sch Ind & Mfg Sci, Cranfield, Beds, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Business process re-engineering; Research methods; Assessment;
D O I
10.1108/14637150510578719
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - There appears to be an ever-insatiable demand from markets for organisations to improve their products and services. To meet this, there is a need to provide business process improvement (BPI) methodologies that are holistic, structured and procedural. Therefore, this paper describes research that has formed and tested a generic and practical methodology termed model-based and integrated process improvement (MIPI) to support the implementation of BPI; and to validate its effectiveness in organisations. This methodology has been created as an aid for practitioners within organisations. Design/methodology/approach - The research objectives were achieved by: reviewing and analysing current methodologies, and selecting a few frameworks against key performance indicators. Using a refined Delphi approach and semi-structured interview with the "experts" in the field. Intervention, case study and process research approach to evaluating a methodology. Findings - The BPI methodology was successfully formed and applied by the researcher and directly by the companies involved against the criteria of feasibility, usability and usefulness. Research limitations/implications - The paper has demonstrated a new knowledge on how to systematically assess a BPI methodology in practice. Practical implications - Model-based and integrated process improvement methodology (MIPI) methodology offers the practitioner (experienced and novice) a set of step-by-step aids necessary to make informed, consistent and efficient changes to business processes. Originality/value - The novelty of this research work is the creation of a holistic workbook-based methodology with relevant tools and techniques. It extends the capabilities of existing methodologies.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / +
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Developing a business process for product development
    Cadden, Trevor
    Downes, Stephen John
    [J]. BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 19 (04) : 715 - 736
  • [32] Developing Taxonomies for Business Process Engineering
    Soetekouw, Ton
    Grefen, Paul
    Vanderfeesten, Irene
    Turetken, Oktay
    [J]. ENTERPRISE DESIGN, OPERATIONS, AND COMPUTING, EDOC 2023, 2024, 14367 : 169 - 186
  • [33] On the business impact of software process improvement
    Kusters, RJ
    Trienekens, JJM
    Hassoldt, W
    [J]. 26TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 59 - 64
  • [34] AN INTEGRATED METHOD FOR BUSINESS PROCESS IMPROVEMENT
    Ma, Jae Yong
    Kim, Byeong Wan
    Se, Young Ho
    Leem, Choon Seong
    Moon, Hyungjoon
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE COMPUTING INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 2012, 8 (7B): : 5237 - 5250
  • [35] THE AFFECTS OF THE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT TO BUSINESS PERFORMANCE
    Kaygusuz, Yesim
    [J]. ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT: 2ND INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE BOOK OF PROCEEDINGS, 2013, : 1085 - 1094
  • [36] MAKING THE BUSINESS CASE FOR PROCESS IMPROVEMENT
    CARD, D
    BAUMERT, J
    [J]. IEEE SOFTWARE, 1994, 11 (04) : 115 - 116
  • [37] Shadow Testing for Business Process Improvement
    Satyal, Suhrid
    Weber, Ingo
    Paik, Hye-young
    Di Ciccio, Claudio
    Mendling, Jan
    [J]. ON THE MOVE TO MEANINGFUL INTERNET SYSTEMS, OTM 2018, PT I, 2018, 11229 : 153 - 171
  • [38] Critical thinking and business process improvement
    Ayad, Amine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 29 (06) : 556 - 564
  • [39] Business process improvement using ebXML
    Song, YT
    Narasimhadevara, S
    Kim, Y
    [J]. Fourth Annual ACIS International Conference on Computer and Information Science, Proceedings, 2005, : 181 - 186
  • [40] Structured Method for Business Process Improvement
    Maaz, Md.
    Kumar, Manish
    [J]. 2012 THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICES IN EMERGING MARKETS (ICSEM), 2012, : 183 - 188