Analgesic effect of premedication with meperidine in patients undergoing colonoscopy without sedation

被引:1
|
作者
Tsai, Ming-Chang [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Tan-Hsia [1 ,3 ]
Lai, Hsin-Wu [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Tzy-Yen [1 ,3 ]
Chang, Ming-Huei [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Chun-Che [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chung Shan Med Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Gastroenterol, sec, 110,Chien Kuo North Rd,Sect 1, Taichung 402, Taiwan
[2] Chung Shan Med Univ, Inst Med, Taichung, Taiwan
[3] Chung Shan Med Univ, Coll Med, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
Analgesia; Colonoscopy; Meperidine;
D O I
10.1016/j.aidm.2014.01.002
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Colonoscopy is a standard and useful examination in the diagnosis of colorectal diseases; however, it usually causes pain to patients. Some patients receive narcotic drugs, e.g., meperidine, for pain relief if a colonoscopy is carried out without sedation. Whether the administration of such analgesic drugs to patients without sedation facilitates the performance of the colonoscopy or reduces pain remains to be elucidated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effect of meperidine as premedication for patients undergoing a colonoscopy without sedation. Patients and Methods: A total of 217 patients (109 men, 108 women) undergoing a diagnostic colonoscopy without sedation were analyzed prospectively. The procedures were carried out by three experienced endoscopists in a medical center. The patients could opt to receive analgesic drugs, with 25 mg of meperidine being given intramuscularly prior to the procedure if requested by either the doctor or patient. The colonoscopic examination was performed by one person using the short-axis method. Questionnaires to evaluate abdominal pain during or after colonoscopy without sedation were collected and analyzed for patients who used meperidine as premedication (Group A) and for those who did not receive meperidine (Group B). Abdominal pain was evaluated using a visual analog scale from 0 to 10. The cecal intubation rate, total insertion time, and the patient's willingness to receive another colonoscopy in the future if needed were also analyze. Results: In both groups, the cecal intubation rate was more than 99% with no significant difference between groups. The mean +/- standard deviation insertion time was 7.14 +/- 5.45 minutes in Group A and 6.24 +/- 4.24 minutes in Group B (p = 0.309). The visual analog pain score was 3.54 +/- 3.13 in Group A and 2.46 +/- 2.75 in Group B (p = 0.009). After adjusting for age and sex, the pain score was 3.51 +/- 3.21 in Group A (p = 0.055). Multivariate analysis showed that female sex and the individual endoscopist performing the colonoscopy were associated with abdominal pain during the examination. Conclusion: In our study, premedication with meperidine or no premedication was not associated with a reduction in abdominal pain during colonoscopy without sedation. The insertion time and cecal intubation rate showed no difference between patients with or without additional analgesic drugs prior to the procedure. However, as self-selection bias could not be ruled out, further randomized, placebo-controlled trials are needed to confirm our findings. Copyright (C) 2014, The Gastroenterological Society of Taiwan and The Digestive Endoscopy Society of Taiwan. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 13
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analgesic efficacy and safety of duloxetine premedication in patients undergoing hysterectomy - A systematic review
    Nair, Abhijit
    Thakre, Manish
    Rangaiah, Manamohan
    Dudhedia, Ujjwalraj
    Borkar, Nitinkumar
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 67 (09) : 770 - +
  • [22] EFFICACY OF SEDATION AND ANALGESIA BY MIDAZOLAM IN ASSOCIATION WITH MEPERIDINE OR FENTANYL FOR ELECTIVE COLONOSCOPY
    Gallusi, G.
    Donato, G.
    Panetta, C.
    Palma, R.
    Pontone, P.
    Borghini, R.
    Lauriola, M.
    Pontone, S.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2017, 49 : E215 - E216
  • [23] Safety of midazolam for sedation of HIV-positive patients undergoing colonoscopy
    Backman, E. S.
    Triant, V. A.
    Ehrenfeld, J. M.
    Lu, Z.
    Arpino, P.
    Losina, E.
    Gandhi, R. T.
    HIV MEDICINE, 2013, 14 (06) : 379 - 384
  • [24] Effect of oral clonidine premedication on perioperative haemodynamic response and postoperative analgesic requirement for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Singh, Shivinder
    Arora, Kapil
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 55 (01) : 26 - 30
  • [25] Colonoscopy without sedation - A viable alternative
    Cataldo, PA
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1996, 39 (03) : 257 - 261
  • [26] Colonoscopy without conscious sedation.
    Hoffman, MS
    Besaw, R
    Menon, P
    Buchanan, T
    Shaver, T
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 45 (04) : 97 - 97
  • [27] Colonoscopy with and without sedation and analgesia.
    Quiblat, ML
    Chan, MM
    Ismael, AE
    Sollano, JD
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 51 (04) : AB82 - AB82
  • [28] A Comparison of Patient Satisfaction With Sedation Between Fentanyl/Midazolam and Meperidine/Midazolam in Patients Undergoing Endoscopy
    Patel, Neal C.
    Heckman, Michael G.
    Palmer, William C.
    Cangemi, David
    DeVault, Kenneth R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 109 (05): : 772 - 774
  • [29] Use of bispectral index monitor (BIS) to follow depth of sedation in patients undergoing colonoscopy with propofol sedation
    Lesser, GS
    Friedman, R
    Deal, E
    Berberian, B
    Peikin, SR
    Elfant, AB
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 59 (05) : AB129 - AB129
  • [30] A comparison of oral diazepam versus midazolam, administered with intravenous meperidine, as premedication to sedation for pediatric endoscopy
    Martinez, JL
    Sutters, KA
    Waite, S
    Davis, J
    Medina, E
    Montano, N
    Merzel, D
    Marquez, C
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 2002, 35 (01): : 51 - 58