Main contractor experiences of partnering relationships on UK construction projects

被引:68
|
作者
Wood, Gerard D. [1 ]
Ellis, Robert C. T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salford, Sch Construct & Property Management, Quant Surveying, Salford M7 1NU, Greater Manches, England
[2] Leeds Metropolitan Univ, Sch Built Environm, Educ Built Environm, Leeds LS2 8BU, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
partnering; commercial relationships; trust; procurement;
D O I
10.1080/0144619042000287714
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Partnering provides a major opportunity for improving project performance, whilst offering direct benefits to the whole of the supply chain. Many research studies reinforce this assertion although there is less critical analysis examining the nature of partnering in practice and whether the claims made for it are consistently justified. The experiences of commercial surveyors and managers within the UK construction industry have been gathered in a pilot study, drawing on the opinions of 48 commercial managers employed by a leading national contractor. The perceptions and experiences of partnering relationships are generally positive, although the early optimism at the beginning of such arrangements is seldom sustained throughout the project lifecycle. Attitudes to partnering are similar whether the relationship is upstream (client/main contractor) or downstream (main contractor/subcontractor). The growth in popularity of alternative procurement methods and statutory adjudication are both regarded as having placed contracting parties on a more equal footing. However in today's competitive environment, contractors continue to operate on tight margins and, common to all project stakeholders, the financial imperative remains the commercial manager's principal consideration. Trust is hard-earned and relationships are still characterised by a cost driven agenda.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 325
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Trust in projects: An empirical assessment of owner/contractor relationships
    Pinto, Jeffrey K.
    Slevin, Dennis P.
    English, Brent
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2009, 27 (06) : 638 - 648
  • [22] GREEN CONSTRUCTION: CONTRACTOR EXPERIENCES, EXPECTATIONS, AND PERCEPTIONS
    Ahn, Yong Han
    Pearce, Annie R.
    JOURNAL OF GREEN BUILDING, 2007, 2 (03): : 106 - 122
  • [23] Optimizing Contractor Selection for Construction Packages in Capital Projects
    Safa, Mahdi
    Yee, Ming-Ho
    Rayside, Derek
    Haas, Carl T.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2016, 30 (05)
  • [24] The role of contractor in improving buildability in construction projects in Bali
    Sanjaya, I. Putu Ari
    Joni, I. Gede Putu
    Frederika, Ariany
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING (ICANCEE 2018), 2019, 276
  • [25] Determination of Contractor Strategies in Delivering Construction Projects in Oman
    Powmya, Ayisha
    Abidin, Nazirah Zainul
    Azizi, Nurul Sakina Mokhtar
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2023, 28 (01) : 293 - 316
  • [26] Interface considerations on multiple prime contractor construction projects
    Kuprenas, JA
    Rosson, M
    CONSTRUCTION CONGRESS VI, PROCEEDING: BUILDING TOGETHER FOR A BETTER TOMORROW IN AN INCREASINGLY COMPLEX WORLD, 2000, : 1093 - 1102
  • [27] Reconciliation of owner and contractor views in heavy construction projects
    Serag, Engy
    Oloufa, Amr
    Malone, Linda
    JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL ISSUES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND PRACTICE, 2008, 134 (01) : 128 - 137
  • [28] Exploring critical success factors for partnering in construction projects
    Chan, APC
    Chan, DWM
    Chiang, YH
    Tang, BS
    Chan, EHW
    Ho, KSK
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 130 (02) : 188 - 198
  • [29] PROJECT PARTNERING - RESULTS OF STUDY OF 280 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
    LARSON, E
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 1995, 11 (02) : 30 - 35
  • [30] Research on Contractor Evaluation and Selection Model Based on Construction Project Partnering Mode
    Feng, Zhuo
    Wang, Pei
    An, Gang
    2015 4th International Conference on Social Sciences and Society (ICSSS 2015), Pt 3, 2015, 72 : 56 - 61