Parenteral opioids in emergency medicine - A systematic review of efficacy and safety

被引:8
|
作者
Niemi-Murola, Leila [1 ,2 ]
Unkuri, Jani [1 ]
Hamunen, Katri [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Meilahti Hosp, Helsinki 00029, Finland
关键词
Emergency medicine; Opioid; Pain;
D O I
10.1016/j.sjpain.2011.05.008
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction and aim: Pain is a frequent symptom in emergency patients and opioids are commonly used to treat it at emergency departments and at pre-hospital settings. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the efficacy and safety of parenteral opioids used for acute pain in emergency medicine. Method: Qualitative review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on parenteral opioids for acute pain in adult emergency patients. Main outcome measures were: type and dose of the opioid, analgesic efficacy as compared to either placebo or another opioid and adverse effects. Results: Twenty double-blind RCTs with results on 2322 patients were included. Seven studies were placebo controlled. Majority of studies were performed in the emergency department. Only five studies were in prehospital setting. Prehospital studies: Four studies were on mainly trauma-related pain, one ischemic chest pain. One study compared two different doses of morphine in mainly trauma pain showing faster analgesia with the larger dose but no difference at 30 min postdrug. Three other studies on the same pain model showed equal analgesic effects with morphine and other opioids. Alfentanil was more effective than morphine in ischemic chest pain. Emergency department studies: Pain models used were acute abdominal pain seven, renal colic four, mixed (mainly abdominal pain) three and trauma pain one study. Five studies compared morphine to placebo in acute abdominal pain and in all studies morphine was more effective than placebo. In four out of five studies on acute abdominal pain morphine did not change diagnostic accuracy, clinical or radiological findings. Most commonly used morphine dose in the emergency department was 0.1 mg/kg (five studies). Other opioids showed analgesic effect comparable to morphine. Adverse effects: Recording and reporting of adverse effects was very variable. Vital signs were recorded in 15 of the 20 studies (including all prehospital studies). Incidence of adverse effects in the opioid groups was 5-38% of the patients in the prehospital setting and 4-46% of the patients in the emergency department. Nausea or vomiting was reported in 11-25% of the patients given opioids. Study drug was discontinued because of adverse effects five patients (one placebo, two sufentanil, two morphine). Eight studies commented on administration of naloxone for reversal of opioid effects. One patient out of 1266 was given naloxone for drowsiness. Ventilatory depression defined by variable criteria occurred in occurred in 7 out of 756 emergency department patients. Conclusion: Evidence for selection of optimal opioid and dose is scarce. Opioids, especially morphine, are effective in relieving acute pain also in emergency medicine patients. Studies so far are small and reporting of adverse effects is very variable. Therefore the safety of different opioids and doses remains to be studied. Also the optimal titration regimens need to be evaluated in future studies. The prevention and treatment of opioid-induced nausea and vomiting is an important clinical consideration that requires further clinical and scientific attention in this patient group. (C) 2011 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 194
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicine Wenxin Keli for ventricular premature be ats: A systematic review
    He, Mei
    Lv, Zhan
    Yang, Zheng-Wei
    Huang, Jiu-Ling
    Liu, Fu
    COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, 2016, 29 : 181 - 189
  • [42] Opioids for the Prevention of Post-dural Puncture Headache in Obstetrics: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Efficacy and Safety
    Wu, Lan
    Chen, Shouming
    Jiang, Xiaoqin
    Cheng, Yan
    Zhang, Wensheng
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2021, 24 (07) : E1155 - U113
  • [43] Comparative efficacy and safety of long-acting oral Opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: A systematic review
    Chou, R
    Clark, E
    Helfand, M
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2003, 26 (05) : 1026 - 1048
  • [44] Efficacy and safety of hepatitis A vaccine: systematic review
    Lebeau, Jean-Pierre
    Frappe, Paul
    EXERCER-LA REVUE FRANCOPHONE DE MEDECINE GENERALE, 2012, 23 (100): : 26S - 27S
  • [45] Efficacy and Safety of PARACHUTE® Device: systematic review
    Teixeira, Roberta da Silva
    Goncalves de Veras, Bruna Medeiros
    Simoes e Senna, Katia Marie
    Caetano, Rosangela
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2018, 64 (09): : 853 - 860
  • [46] Cosmeceuticals for antiaging: a systematic review of safety and efficacy
    Lau, Megan
    Gollogly, Jessica Mineroff
    Wang, Jennifer Y.
    Jagdeo, Jared
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 316 (05)
  • [47] Efficacy and Safety of Metformin for Obesity: A Systematic Review
    Masarwa, Reem
    Brunetti, Vanessa C.
    Aloe, Stephanie
    Henderson, Melanie
    Platt, Robert W.
    Filion, Kristian B.
    PEDIATRICS, 2021, 147 (03)
  • [48] Efficacy and Safety of Ivabradine in Arrhythmias: A Systematic Review
    Aly, Yasmine Refaat Mohamed
    Beshir, Semira Abdi
    Gillani, Syed Wasif
    PHARMACY PRACTICE-GRANADA, 2023, 21 (03):
  • [49] SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ASHWAGANDHA FOR SLEEP: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Ashraf, Sahar
    Shah, Kaushal
    Aedma, Kapil
    Mansuri, Zeeshan
    Jain, Shailesh
    SLEEP, 2022, 45 : A303 - A304
  • [50] Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of colorectal stents
    Khot, UP
    Lang, AW
    Murali, K
    Parker, MC
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 89 (09) : 1096 - 1102