The impact of shareholders' types on corporate social responsibility: evidence from Japanese firms

被引:5
|
作者
Nakamura, Eri [1 ]
机构
[1] Shinshu Univ, Dept Econ, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; Corporate governance; Investment strategy; Shareholders; Japanese firms; Japan;
D O I
10.1108/20412561311324104
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this study is to use an empirical model to investigate the effects of eight types of shareholders on corporate social responsibility (CSR) investments in terms of the monetary amount and ratio of each investment. Design/methodology/approach - Cross-sectional data obtained from Japanese companies in 2010 were used and three equations were estimated which reflect the effects of various shareholders on three types of CSR using ordinary least squares (OLS). Findings - The study finds that the effects of shareholders on CSR investment are different depending on shareholder types. Investment funds and top management shareholders decrease each CSR investment, while the government, foreign companies and individuals, financial institutions, brokerages, and domestic companies and individuals increase CSR investments. Moreover, different shareholder types are interested in different CSR. Most shareholders are concerned with environmental policies, while foreign shareholders are also concerned with work-life balance policies. Investment funds shareholders pay attention to all kinds of CSR. In addition, most outside shareholders are only concerned about individual CSR investments rather than a company's entire CSR resource allocation strategy. Originality/value - This study empirically analyzes various types of shareholders, determining which hypothesis is valid and what type of shareholder increases or decreases CSR investment. This study considers shareholders' effects not only on each CSR action, but also in terms of an overall CSR strategy. This study provides guidance for managers that they should take into account in order to respond to each type of shareholder when they make decisions on CSR.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 130
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does corporate social responsibility affect tax avoidance: Evidence from family firms
    Lopez-Gonzalez, Eva
    Martinez-Ferrero, Jennifer
    Garcia-Meca, Emma
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 26 (04) : 819 - 831
  • [32] Digital innovation and corporate social responsibility performance: Evidence from firms' digital patents
    Li, Haitong
    Lu, Lanting
    Lin, Ziang
    Meng, Tianze
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2024, 207
  • [34] Board Composition and Corporate Social Responsibility Performance: Evidence from Chinese Public Firms
    Zhuang, Yiming
    Chang, Xinyue
    Lee, Younggeun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (08)
  • [35] Determinants and consequences of voluntary corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from private firms
    Chi, Wuchun
    Wu, Shing-Jen
    Zheng, Zhen
    BRITISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2020, 52 (06):
  • [36] The Impact of Government Ownership and Corporate Governance on the Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from UAE
    Farhan, Ayda
    Freihat, Abdel Razaq Farah
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2021, 8 (01): : 851 - 861
  • [37] Multiple large shareholders and corporate social responsibility reporting
    Cao, Feng
    Peng, Songlan
    Ye, Kangtao
    EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2019, 38 : 287 - 309
  • [38] Corporate Social Responsibility and Family Firms
    Li, Dan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT INNOVATION, 2015, 6 : 239 - 244
  • [39] The impact of earnings opacity on corporate social responsibility: insights from Vietnamese listed firms
    Nguyen, Ha Thi Thu
    Nguyen, Tri Tri
    Nguyen, Hien Thi Thu
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND DEVELOPMENT, 2024,