AGRONOMIC AND ECONOMIC RESPONSE OF SPRING WHEAT CULTIVARS TO ETHEPHON

被引:10
|
作者
KHAN, A
SPILDE, L
机构
[1] N DAKOTA STATE UNIV,FARGO,ND 58105
[2] NW FRONTIER PROV AGR UNIV,PESHAWAR,PAKISTAN
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400030010x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Efforts to optimize grain yields in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) are often hindered by excessive lodging associated with intensive cereal management systems. The plant growth regulator ethephon [(2-chloroethyl) phosphonic acid] has been used as an essential component of intensive cereal management systems in Europe to control lodging and maintain high yield potential. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of ethephon on four hard red spring wheat cultivars in North Dakota environments. A randomized complete block design in a split plot arrangement with four replicates was used at each of four locations in 1987 and 1988. Main plot treatments consisted of the cultivars Era, Stoa, Len, and Nordic, and split plots were assigned to ethephon and control (no ethephon). Application of ethephon (280 g a.i. ha-1) increased grain yield 5.4% when averaged across environments and cultivars. Generally, ethephon application tended to increase spikes per square meter but had no effect on kernel weight and kernels per spike. Ethephon treatment reduced lodging in 1987. Lodging was absent in 1988. Application of ethephon had a significant positive effect on test weight, but did not influence grain protein concentration and maturity. Economic parameters, net benefit, and marginal rate of return, indicated ethephon could be recommended for cultivars Era, Len, and Stoa, but not for Nordic under environmental conditions similar to those in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 402
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] INHERITANCE OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND AGRONOMIC CHARACTERS IN SPRING WHEAT
    HSU, P
    WALTON, PD
    EUPHYTICA, 1970, 19 (01) : 54 - +
  • [22] AGRONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF WINTER VERSUS SPRING WHEAT
    ENTZ, MH
    FOWLER, DB
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1991, 83 (03) : 527 - 532
  • [23] DIFFERENTIAL AGRONOMIC RESPONSE OF WINTER-WHEAT CULTIVARS TO PREANTHESIS ENVIRONMENTAL-STRESS
    ENTZ, MH
    FOWLER, DB
    CROP SCIENCE, 1990, 30 (05) : 1119 - 1123
  • [24] BLACKPOINT INFECTION OF SPRING WHEAT CULTIVARS
    ELLIS, SA
    GOODING, MJ
    DAVIES, WP
    FENWICK, R
    ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 1994, 124 : 130 - 131
  • [25] EFFECT OF SEEDING DEPTH AND TEMPERATURE ON TILLERING CHARACTERISTICS OF 4 SPRING WHEAT CULTIVARS OF 4 SPRING WHEAT CULTIVARS
    HUCL, P
    BAKER, RJ
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1990, 70 (02) : 409 - 417
  • [26] Agronomic responses of winter wheat cultivars to management systems
    Guy, SO
    TablasRomero, H
    Heikkinen, MK
    JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1995, 8 (04): : 529 - 535
  • [27] GENETIC BEHAVIOR OF AGRONOMIC CHARACTERS IN THIRTY WHEAT CULTIVARS
    IBRAHIM, AF
    ABULNAAS, AA
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PFLANZENZUCHTUNG-JOURNAL OF PLANT BREEDING, 1974, 71 (02): : 170 - 178
  • [28] QUALITY RESPONSE OF 10 HARD RED SPRING WHEAT CULTIVARS TO 25 ENVIRONMENTS
    MCGUIRE, CF
    MCNEAL, FH
    CROP SCIENCE, 1974, 14 (02) : 175 - 178
  • [29] AGRONOMIC PERFORMANCES OF HETEROGENEOUSLY GROUP OF SPRING WHEAT GENOTYPES
    Racz, Ionut
    Kadar, Rozalia
    Varady, Adina
    Hiriscau, Diana
    Russu, Florin
    Tritean, Nicolae
    Berindean, Ioana Virginia
    ROMANIAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2021, 38 : 231 - 237
  • [30] THE RESPONSE OF 13 HARD RED SPRING AND 5 DURUM-WHEAT CULTIVARS TO WHEAT STREAK MOSAIC
    TIMIAN, RG
    MCMULLEN, M
    NORTH DAKOTA FARM RESEARCH, 1986, 44 (01): : 3 - 4