AGRONOMIC AND ECONOMIC RESPONSE OF SPRING WHEAT CULTIVARS TO ETHEPHON

被引:10
|
作者
KHAN, A
SPILDE, L
机构
[1] N DAKOTA STATE UNIV,FARGO,ND 58105
[2] NW FRONTIER PROV AGR UNIV,PESHAWAR,PAKISTAN
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400030010x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Efforts to optimize grain yields in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) are often hindered by excessive lodging associated with intensive cereal management systems. The plant growth regulator ethephon [(2-chloroethyl) phosphonic acid] has been used as an essential component of intensive cereal management systems in Europe to control lodging and maintain high yield potential. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of ethephon on four hard red spring wheat cultivars in North Dakota environments. A randomized complete block design in a split plot arrangement with four replicates was used at each of four locations in 1987 and 1988. Main plot treatments consisted of the cultivars Era, Stoa, Len, and Nordic, and split plots were assigned to ethephon and control (no ethephon). Application of ethephon (280 g a.i. ha-1) increased grain yield 5.4% when averaged across environments and cultivars. Generally, ethephon application tended to increase spikes per square meter but had no effect on kernel weight and kernels per spike. Ethephon treatment reduced lodging in 1987. Lodging was absent in 1988. Application of ethephon had a significant positive effect on test weight, but did not influence grain protein concentration and maturity. Economic parameters, net benefit, and marginal rate of return, indicated ethephon could be recommended for cultivars Era, Len, and Stoa, but not for Nordic under environmental conditions similar to those in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 402
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] HEIGHT AND YIELD RESPONSE OF SELECTED WHEAT, BARLEY, AND TRITICALE CULTIVARS TO ETHEPHON
    DAHNOUS, K
    VIGUE, GT
    LAW, AG
    KONZAK, CF
    MILLER, DG
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1982, 74 (03) : 580 - 582
  • [2] SPRING WHEAT AND BARLEY RESPONSES TO ETHEPHON
    SIMMONS, SR
    OELKE, EA
    WIERSMA, JV
    LUESCHEN, WE
    WARNES, DD
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1988, 80 (05) : 829 - 834
  • [3] Agronomic performance and quality of spring wheat and soybean cultivars under organic culture
    Nass, HG
    Ivany, JA
    MacLeod, JA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AGRICULTURE, 2003, 18 (03): : 164 - 170
  • [4] Agronomic performance of wheat cultivars in response to nitrogen fertilization levels
    Benin, Giovani
    Bornhofen, Elesandro
    Beche, Eduardo
    Pagliosa, Eduardo Stefani
    da Silva, Cristiano Lemes
    Pinnow, Cilas
    ACTA SCIENTIARUM-AGRONOMY, 2012, 34 (03): : 275 - 283
  • [5] RESPONSE OF TOMATO CULTIVARS TO ETHEPHON
    WILLIAMS, JW
    SISTRUNK, WA
    KAYS, SJ
    ARKANSAS FARM RESEARCH, 1977, 26 (02): : 6 - 6
  • [6] AGRONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF SPRING WHEAT ISOLINES DIFFERING FOR DAYLENGTH RESPONSE
    MARSHALL, L
    BUSCH, R
    CHOLICK, F
    EDWARDS, I
    FROHBERG, R
    CROP SCIENCE, 1989, 29 (03) : 752 - 757
  • [7] Agronomic and economic responses of spring wheat to management of Fusarium head blight
    Hollingsworth, C. R.
    Motteberg, C. D.
    Wiersma, J. V.
    Atkinson, L. M.
    PLANT DISEASE, 2008, 92 (09) : 1339 - 1348
  • [8] Response of four spring wheat cultivars to drought stress
    Moustafa, MA
    Boersma, L
    Kronstad, WE
    CROP SCIENCE, 1996, 36 (04) : 982 - 986
  • [9] Agronomic Performance of Spring Wheat as Related to Planting Date and Photoperiod Response
    Lanning, S. P.
    Hucl, P.
    Pumphrey, M.
    Carter, A. H.
    Lamb, P. F.
    Carlson, G. R.
    Wichman, D. M.
    Kephart, K. D.
    Spaner, D.
    Martin, J. M.
    Talbert, L. E.
    CROP SCIENCE, 2012, 52 (04) : 1633 - 1639
  • [10] RESPONSE OF OAT CULTIVARS TO ETHEPHON AND BORON
    Addaheri, A. M. S.
    Abood, N. M.
    IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2020, 51 (01): : 259 - 268