The Effect of Lifting Speed on Cumulative and Peak Biomechanical Loading for Symmetric Lifting Tasks

被引:11
|
作者
Greenland, Kasey O. [1 ]
Merryweather, Andrew S. [1 ]
Bloswick, Donald S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Mech Engn, Ergon & Safety Program, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
关键词
back; lifting; speed; shoulder;
D O I
10.1016/j.shaw.2013.04.001
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: To determine the influence of lifting speed and type on peak and cumulative back compressive force (BCF) and shoulder moment (SM) loads during symmetric lifting. Another aim of the study was to compare static and dynamic lifting models. Methods: Ten male participants performed a floor-to-shoulder, floor-to-waist, and waist-to-shoulder lift at three different speeds [slow (0.34 m/s), medium (0.44 m/s), and fast (0.64 m/s)], and with two different loads [light (2.25 kg) and heavy (9 kg)]. Two-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were determined. A three-way repeated measures analysis of variance was used to calculate peak and cumulative loading of BCF and SM for light and heavy loads. Results: Peak BCF was significantly different between slow and fast lifting speeds (p < 0.001), with a mean difference of 20% between fast and slow lifts. The cumulative loading of BCF and SM was significantly different between fast and slow lifting speeds (p < 0.001), with mean differences >= 80%. Conclusion: Based on peak values, BCF is highest for fast speeds, but the BCF cumulative loading is highest for slow speeds, with the largest difference between fast and slow lifts. This may imply that a slow lifting speed is at least as hazardous as a fast lifting speed. It is important to consider the duration of lift when determining risks for back and shoulder injuries due to lifting and that peak values alone are likely not sufficient. (C)2013, Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 110
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EFFECT OF GAPS ON LOADING DISTRIBUTION OF PLANAR LIFTING SURFACES
    WHITE, RB
    LANDAHL, MT
    AIAA JOURNAL, 1968, 6 (04) : 626 - &
  • [32] Natural breath control during lifting tasks: effect of load
    Marshall Hagins
    Eric M. Lamberg
    European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2006, 96 : 453 - 458
  • [33] Effect of gloves on prehensile forces during lifting and holding tasks
    Kinoshita, H
    ERGONOMICS, 1999, 42 (10) : 1372 - 1385
  • [34] Natural breath control during lifting tasks: effect of load
    Hagins, M
    Lamberg, EM
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 96 (04) : 453 - 458
  • [35] The Effect of Weight Lifting Upon the Speed of Muscular Contractions
    Zorbas, William S.
    Karpovich, Peter V.
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1951, 22 (02): : 145 - 148
  • [36] Spinal compression at peak isometric and isokinetic exertions in simulated lifting in symmetric and asymmetric planes
    Kumar, S
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1996, 11 (05) : 281 - 289
  • [37] The effects of initial lifting height, load magnitude, and lifting speed on the peak dynamic L5/S1 moments
    Lavender, SA
    Andersson, GBJ
    Schipplein, OD
    Fuentes, HJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2003, 31 (01) : 51 - 59
  • [38] The influence of trunk modelling in 3D biomechanical analysis of simple and complex lifting tasks
    Larivière, C
    Gagnon, D
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1999, 14 (07) : 449 - 461
  • [39] A field evaluation method for assessing whole body biomechanical joint stress in manual lifting tasks
    Lin, Chiuhsiang J.
    Wang, Shun J.
    Chen, Hung J.
    INDUSTRIAL HEALTH, 2006, 44 (04) : 604 - 612
  • [40] Biomechanical Risk Assessment of Human Lifting Tasks via Supervised Classification of Multiple Sensor Data
    Santopaolo, Alessandro
    Lorenzini, Marta
    Privitera, Luigi
    Varrecchia, Tiwana
    Chini, Giorgia
    Ranavolo, Alberto
    Ariano, Paolo
    Ajoudani, Arash
    2022 IEEE-RAS 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMANOID ROBOTS (HUMANOIDS), 2022, : 746 - 751