Magnetoviscosity in magnetic fluids: Testing different models of the magnetization equation

被引:5
|
作者
Weng, Huei Chu [1 ]
Chen, Cha'o-Kuang [2 ]
Chang, Min-Hsing [3 ]
机构
[1] Chung Yuan Christian Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Chungli 32023, Taiwan
[2] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
[3] Tatung Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Taipei 10452, Taiwan
来源
SMART SCIENCE | 2013年 / 1卷 / 01期
关键词
Ferrohydrodynamics; Ferrofluids; Magnetic nanofluids; Effective viscosity; Rotational viscosity; Magnetization relaxation;
D O I
10.1080/23080477.2013.11665586
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Despite a long research history, theoretical predictions for the material properties as well as the flow fields and characteristics of magnetic fluids were not well consistent with the experimental data. The lack of a universally accepted magnetization equation for accurately modeling hydrodynamics of magnetic fluids/nanofluids is particularly a major issue. In this paper, we give an overview on the continuum theory and test the six well-known models via comparisons with magnetoviscosity measurements to make clear the magnetization relaxation due to the rotation of magnetic particles and see how well they make predictions on the basis of numerical calculations. Results reveal that the ML model leads to unexplainable behavior. Moreover, the WC model with a 'relaxation rate' modification is found to reproduce the predictions of the MRSh model, which agree well with experimental data. The revised WC model (WCC) should therefore be preferred.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 58
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Magnetic flux leakage testing: Strong or weak magnetization
    Sukhorukov, V. (vsukhorukov@intron-plus.com), 1600, American Society for Nondestructive Testing (71):
  • [32] Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing Strong or Weak Magnetization?
    Sukhorukov, Vasily
    MATERIALS EVALUATION, 2013, 71 (05) : 26 - 31
  • [33] Testing Nonnested Structural Equation Models
    Merkle, Edgar C.
    You, Dongjun
    Preacher, Kristopher J.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2016, 21 (02) : 151 - 163
  • [34] TESTING FOR HETEROSCEDASTICITY IN SIMULTANEOUS EQUATION MODELS
    HARVEY, AC
    PHILLIPS, GDA
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1981, 15 (03) : 311 - 340
  • [35] The application of perturbational statistical theories to the investigation of the static magnetization of magnetic fluids
    Popescu, LB
    Socoliuc, V
    Bica, D
    Vekas, L
    JOURNAL OF OPTOELECTRONICS AND ADVANCED MATERIALS, 2005, 7 (02): : 753 - 757
  • [36] The Amplitude Equation for the Rosensweig Instability in Magnetic Fluids and Gels
    Bohlius, Stefan
    Pleiner, Harald
    Brand, Helmut R.
    PROGRESS OF THEORETICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 125 (01): : 1 - 46
  • [37] SOME FEATURES OF THE MAGNETIZATION OF THIN LAYERS OF MAGNETIC FLUIDS WITH MAGNETIZED AGGREGATES IN MAGNETIC AND ELECTRIC FIELDS
    Gladkikh, D. V.
    Dikansky, Yu. I.
    Ispiryan, A. G.
    MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS, 2018, 54 (1-2): : 15 - 21
  • [38] Static and dynamic magnetization models of magnetic nanoparticles: an appraisal
    Yari, Parsa
    Chugh, Vinit Kumar
    Saha, Renata
    Tonini, Denis
    Rezaei, Bahareh
    Mostufa, Shahriar
    Xu, Kanglin
    Wang, Jian-Ping
    Wu, Kai
    PHYSICA SCRIPTA, 2023, 98 (08)
  • [39] USING FRACTAL CRUSTAL MAGNETIZATION MODELS IN MAGNETIC INTERPRETATION
    PILKINGTON, M
    GREGOTSKI, ME
    TODOESCHUCK, JP
    GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 1994, 42 (06) : 677 - 692
  • [40] Magnetization of rotating ferrofluids:: Predictions of different theoretical models
    Leschhorn, A
    Lücke, M
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHYSIKALISCHE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY & CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 220 (02): : 219 - 224