GM-CSF, CARBOPLATIN, DOXORUBICIN - A PHASE-I STUDY

被引:0
|
作者
POPLIN, EA
ALBERTS, DS
RINEHART, JJ
SMITH, HO
NEIDHART, JA
HERSH, EM
机构
[1] TEXAS A&M UNIV SYST, SCOTT & WHITE CLIN, TEMPLE, TX USA
[2] UNIV ARIZONA, CTR CANC, TUCSON, AZ 85721 USA
[3] UNIV NEW MEXICO, ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87131 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Dose intensification has the potential to increase the response frequency of chemosensitive tumors to chemotherapy. G-CSF and GM-CSF offer the possibility of dose-intensifying chemotherapy without prohibitive myelosuppression. A phase I study was undertaken to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of carboplatin that could be administered with a fixed dose of doxorubicin, 60 mg/m2, administered every 28 days. Further escalation of the carboplatin dose was then attempted, with the concomitant addition of GM-CSF 10 mg/kg per day on days 1-21. We had 21 patients, 13 with prior therapy, who were eligible. In all, 60 courses of therapy were delivered, all with doxorubicin and with carboplatin doses of 250 mg/M2, 325 Mg/M2 and 400 Mg/M2. At carboplatin 400 Mg/M2 and doxorubicin 60 Mg/M2, thrombocytopenia was dose limiting. The addition of GM-CSF did not allow further escalation. Of the 6 patients treated with carboplatin 400 Mg/M2, doxorubicin 60 Mg/M2, and GM-CSF, grade 4 granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were seen in 4 and 5 patients, respectively. The severity of thrombocytopenia was related to the calculated carboplatin AUC and also to baseline platelet count and prior therapy. In addition, the interaction of GM-CSF and chemotherapy, especially carboplatin-based, may be more complex than originally anticipated.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 346
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] High pathological complete remission rates with paclitaxel and carboplatin ± trastuzumab (TC±H) following dose dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) supported by GM-CSF in breast cancer-a phase I study.
    Mehta, RS
    Schubbert, T
    Hsiang, D
    Butler, J
    Baick, C
    Su, MY
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2005, 94 : S225 - S225
  • [32] Phase I dose intensification study of 2-weekly epirubicin with GM-CSF in advanced cancer
    Michael, M
    Toner, GC
    Olver, IN
    Fenessy, A
    Bishop, JF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1997, 20 (03): : 259 - 262
  • [33] Phase I trial of etoposide, carboplatin, and GM-CSF in extensive small-cell lung cancer - A cancer and leukemia group B study (CALGB 8832)
    Luikart, SD
    Herndon, JE
    Hollis, DR
    MacDonald, M
    Maurer, LH
    Crawford, J
    Clamon, GH
    Wright, J
    Perry, MC
    Ozer, H
    Green, MR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1997, 20 (01): : 24 - 30
  • [34] Gm-Csf Autoantibody Does Not Completely Interfere The Binding Of Gm-Csf To Its Receptor But Blocks Gm-Csf Signaling Strongly
    Hashimoto, A.
    Tanaka, T.
    Higuchi, M.
    Itoh, Y.
    Shiiya, K.
    Akasaka, K.
    Tazawa, R.
    Nakata, K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 191
  • [35] Aerosolized GM-CSF
    Markovic, Svetomir N.
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2007, 25 : 53 - 54
  • [36] GM-CSF in inflammation
    Hamilton, John A.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2020, 217 (01):
  • [37] ANTIBODIES TO GM-CSF
    GILLIS, S
    GARRISON, L
    LANCET, 1990, 335 (8699): : 1217 - 1217
  • [38] GM-CSF and proteinosis
    Khanjari, F
    Watier, H
    Domenech, J
    Asquier, E
    Diot, P
    Nakata, K
    THORAX, 2003, 58 (07) : 645 - 645
  • [39] GM-CSF biology
    Hamilton, JA
    Anderson, GP
    GROWTH FACTORS, 2004, 22 (04) : 225 - 231
  • [40] GM-CSF in focus
    Maria Papatriantafyllou
    Nature Reviews Immunology, 2011, 11 : 370 - 371