APPLYING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION AIDING TECHNIQUES IN THE PROCESS OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT WITHIN THE WEDDING PLANNING BUSINESS

被引:1
|
作者
Gorecka, Dorota [1 ]
机构
[1] Nicolaus Copernicus Univ Torun, Fac Econ Sci & Management, Ul Gagarina 13a, PL-87100 Torun, Poland
关键词
MCDA; outranking relation; PROMETHEE II with veto threshold; VDA; MACBETH;
D O I
10.5277/ord120403
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Numerous problems that emerge in the process of project management can be presented as multi-criteria issues and solved with the help of appropriate methods. The contracting authority, selecting one tender out of many available tenders, assesses them, taking into account various criteria, e.g. price, expected execution time and the contractor's experience. The owner of a company intending to purchase the fixed assets requisite for the realization of the project behaves similarly, i.e. the most advantageous model of the device is chosen, taking into account not only its price but also production capacity, energy intensity, noise emission, service availability, etc. From among many concepts, the investor has to choose a solution which frequently constitutes a compromise between price, functional properties, durability and aesthetics of performance, as well as safety of the utilization and impact on the environment. The choice of an investment location depends not only on the market, financial and supply factors, but also on so called soft factors such as the perceived quality of institutions and the attitude of local communities. All such situations can be described in the same way: taking into account preferences of the decision maker, the best possible choice must be made out of a finite set of alternatives evaluated according to a finite set of criteria. There are many different methods that can be used to aid a decision maker in this choice, including, but not limited to, techniques based on the outranking relation, verbal decision analysis and the MACBETH method. In this article, they will be compared and their applicability to different types of decision making problems will be considered. Furthermore, the PROMETHEE II method with a veto threshold will be presented within the text. Because the application of project management in the wedding planning business has gained wide popularity, as an illustrative example an empirical study of selecting the best venue for a wedding reception will be elaborated.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 67
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Applying Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Global Software Development with Scrum Project Planning
    Almeida, Luis Henrique
    Pinheiro, Placido Rogerio
    Albuquerque, Adriano Bessa
    [J]. ROUGH SETS AND KNOWLEDGE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 6954 : 311 - +
  • [2] Improved decision aiding in human resource management A case using constructivist multi-criteria decision aiding
    Ensslin, Sandra Rolim
    Ensslin, Leonardo
    Back, Felipe
    de Oliveira Lacerda, Rogerio Tadeu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 62 (07) : 735 - 757
  • [3] A special issue on multi-criteria decision aiding
    Matteo Brunelli
    Michele Fedrizzi
    Salvatore Greco
    José Rui Figueira
    Roman Słowiński
    [J]. Decisions in Economics and Finance, 2020, 43 : 557 - 558
  • [4] A special issue on multi-criteria decision aiding
    Brunelli, Matteo
    Fedrizzi, Michele
    Greco, Salvatore
    Figueira, Jose Rui
    Slowinski, Roman
    [J]. DECISIONS IN ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2020, 43 (02) : 557 - 558
  • [5] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING (MCDM) TECHNIQUES IN PLANNING
    MASSAM, BH
    [J]. PROGRESS IN PLANNING, 1988, 30 : 1 - &
  • [6] Decision-making for multi-criteria optimization of process planning
    Arquis E.
    Delolme L.
    Antomarchi A.-L.
    Durieux S.
    Duc E.
    [J]. Mechanics and Industry, 2019, 20
  • [7] Multi-criteria performance analysis for decision making in project management
    Marques, Guillaume
    Gourc, Didier
    Lauras, Matthieu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2011, 29 (08) : 1057 - 1069
  • [8] How to Handle Missing Values in Multi-Criteria Decision Aiding?
    Labreuche, Christophe
    Destercke, Sebastien
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, : 1756 - 1763
  • [9] Multi-criteria Decision Analysis in the Railway Risk Management Process
    Baginski, Jacek
    Flisiuk, Barbara
    Gorka, Wojciech
    Rogowski, Dariusz
    Steclik, Tomasz
    [J]. BEYOND DATABASES, ARCHITECTURES AND STRUCTURES (BDAS): PAVING THE ROAD TO SMART DATA PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS, 2019, 1018 : 126 - 138
  • [10] MODEL OF THE PROCESS OF GEOSPATIAL MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS FOR TERRITORIAL PLANNING
    Kuznichenko, S. D.
    [J]. RADIO ELECTRONICS COMPUTER SCIENCE CONTROL, 2022, (02) : 140 - 153